Doc.: IEEE 802.15-09-0673-00 Submission September 2009 Tim Godfrey, EPRISlide 1 Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE xxxxx Submission doc. : IEEE wng0 Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE b Submission March 2005 Robert Cragie, Jennic Ltd.Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area.
Doc.: IEEE tg9-proposed-document-changes Submission Nov 2013 Robert Moskowitz, VerizonSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for.
Doc.: IEEE e Submission: MAC Layer Fragmentation Proposal 27-June-2008 Ben RolfeSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless.
Doc.: IEEE xxxxx Submission doc. : IEEE Slide 1 Junbeom Hur and Sungrae Cho, Chung-Ang University Project: IEEE P
Doc.: IEEE s Submission January 2015 Mineo Takai, Space-Time EngineeringSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal.
IEEE e Submission: Wireless Ping for Network Management 8 September 2008 Bhatti, Mitsubishi ElectricSlide 1 Project: IEEE P
Doc.: IEEE e Submission f TG November 2009 Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc.: IEEE s Submission March 2015 Mitsuru Iwaoka, Yokogawa Electric Co.Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless.
Doc.: IEEE s Submission January 2015 Mitsuru Iwaoka, Yokogawa Electric Co.Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless.
Doc.: IEEE /037r0 Submission January 2003 Ed Callaway, Motorola Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc.: IEEE s Submission July 2015 Hidetoshi Yokora, Landis&GyrSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area.
Doc.: IEEE /xxxr0 Submission Phil Jamieson November 2002 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission.
Doc.: IEEE Hop-Discuss Submission July 2014 Robert Moskowitz, Verizon Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal.
Doc: IEEE k TG4k Submission Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title:[Fragmentation.
Doc.: IEEE b Submission January 2005 Robert Cragie, Jennic Ltd.Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area.
Doc.: IEEE /133r0 Submission March 2003 Michael Park, Samsung Electronics co., LtdSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal.
Doc.: IEEE s Submission September 2015 Hidetoshi Yokota and Ruben Salazar, Landis&GyrSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for.
Doc.: IEEE KMP-Transport-Joint Submission July 2012 Robert Moskowitz, Verizon Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless.
Doc.: IEEE Submission doc. : IEEE March 2009 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc.: IEEE b Submission November 2004 Robert Cragie, Jennic Ltd.Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal.
Doc.: IEEE g TG4g - SUN September 2009 Phil Beecher, Beecher Communications Consultants Ltd Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group.
1 May 2009 Doc: IEEE g Submission Scott Weikel, Elster Electricty Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
IEEE xxxx e Submission: Required Log Items 1 September 2008 Ryoji Ono, Hirohito Nishiyama, Tatsuji MunakaSlide 1 Project: IEEE P
Doc.: IEEE Submission, Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Consistent, Standardized.
Doc.: b Submission Mar Song-Lin Young[Sharp Labs.] Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc.: IEEE s Submission May 2015 Hidetoshi Yokora, Landis&GyrSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area.
Submission November 2015 Slide 1Li Qiang, Huawei Technologies Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission.
Doc.: IEEE COEX-02/004r0 Submission 23 January, 2001 James P. K. Gilb, Appairent Technologies Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal.
Slide 1 SEPT doc.: c Submission Clint Powell, Kuor-Hsin Chang - Freescale, Inc. Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless.
Doc.: IEEE Submission, Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Communicating.
Doc.: IEEE g TG4g - SUN November 2009 Phil Beecher, Beecher Communications Consultants Ltd Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group.
Doc.: IEEE f Submission f TG September 2009 Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
p Submission June 2012 Yale Lee, Lilee Systems Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission.
Doc.: IEEE Submission Sept 2010 Rick Roberts (Intel Labs)Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
Project: IEEE Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Proposals for adding a version number and for the treatment.
Project: IEEE Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Proposals for adding a frame version number and for the.
Submission Title: [Add name of submission]
November 2014 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [SRM related functions in ]
June 2006 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Proposed Scenarios for Usage Model Document.
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
May 2018 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Considerations on general MAC frame] Date Submitted:
November 2011 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: MAC common concepts and merge strategy.
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Consistent, Standardized Methods for Wireless.
<month year> doc.: IEEE /244r0 May 2001
Submission Title: [Compatible DSSS g Network Communications Proposal]
8 July 2008 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [MAC Error Reporting Proposal] Date Submitted:
<month year> doc.: IEEE < e>
<May,2009> doc.: IEEE <doc .....> <July 2009>
March 2015 doc.: IEEE s March 2015 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title:
Nov 2013 Robert Moskowitz, Verizon
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Improved Delayed ACK response Frame for.
< November, 2011 > Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [More Low Energy Mechanism Details]
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Nov 2013 Robert Moskowitz, Verizon
May 2018 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Considerations on general MAC frame] Date Submitted:
f- 433 MHz PHY and MAC for TG4f - Preliminary Proposal July 2009 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal.
<month year> doc.: IEEE < e>
July 2012 Robert Moskowitz, Verizon
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
<month year> <January 2019>
<month year> doc.: IEEE s March 2019
July 2004 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Modified Delayed (Dly) Acknowledgement for.
doc.: IEEE < IETF>
<month year> doc.: IEEE s November 2015
September 2008 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Suggested TG3c PAR Changes] Date Submitted:
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
July 2009 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Flexible DSSS Merging Effort] Date Submitted:
Presentation transcript:

doc.: IEEE Submission September 2009 Tim Godfrey, EPRISlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Metrics to support extended length MPDU] Date Submitted: [22 September, 2009] Source: [T Godfrey] Company [EPRI] Address [3420 Hillview Avenue, Palo Alto, California 94304] Voice:[ ], Re: [In response to chair’s request at Joint session of TG4e, TG4f, and TG4g, 21 September 2009] Contributors: [Tim Godfrey (EPRI), Craig Rodine (EPRI)] Abstract:[Proposal for extending metrics available through MAC SAP to enable higher layers to implement dynamic fragmentation (MTU) to enable reliable transfer of 1500 octet packets called for in 15.4g PAR] Purpose:[To be considered during e standard development process] Notice:This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE P It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release:The contributor acknowledges and accepts that this contribution becomes the property of IEEE and may be made publicly available by P

doc.: IEEE Submission September 2009 Tim Godfrey, EPRISlide 2 IEEE P2030 Smart Grid Interoperability Standards Development Kick-Off Meeting June 3-5, 2009 Hosted by INTEL, Corporation, Santa Clara, CA Metrics to support extended MPDU lengths in Tim Godfrey EPRI

doc.: IEEE Submission September 2009 Tim Godfrey, EPRISlide 3 Introduction: the issue The g PAR calls for “PHY frame sizes up to a minimum of 1500 octets”. –The intention behind this requirement is to allow direct support of IP packets The MAC was designed for 127 byte packets –Long packets and low rates = transmission duration up to of 100s of mS. –Channel impairments and interference bursts may occur in the range of a few mS. –Result: very low probability of transmission success

doc.: IEEE Submission September 2009 Tim Godfrey, EPRISlide 4 Proposal Extend the MAC to provide a set of metrics to allow higher layers to implement dynamic fragmentation based on channel conditions –Extend MLME SAP to convey necessary MAC information to higher layers (to support dynamic fragmentation at network layer – E.G IETF 6LOPAN) In poor channel conditions, and/or at very low rates, upper layers will fragment 1500 octet packets into smaller MSDUs to be carried over network –The algorithm for deriving optimal MSDU sizes based on the provided metrics is out of the scope of this standard New metrics are added by extending MLME-GET.request –New MAC PIB attributes are added to Table 127 –Where necessary, PLME-GET.request and PLME-GET.confirm will be extended to support new attributes

doc.: IEEE Submission September 2009 Tim Godfrey, EPRISlide 5 PHY Metrics FunctionExistingNeededNice To Have LQI – link quality indicatorPD-DATA.indication ppduLinkQuality (6.13.8) MLME-BEACON-NOTIFY.indication PANDescriptor LinkQuality ( ) PHY rates and modulations (rate implies modulation) PD-DATA.indication DataRate RSSI – Receive Signal Strength IndicatorPLME-ED provides RSSI when accompanying a valid received packet RSNI – Receive Signal to Noise IndicatorX ANPI – Average Noise Power Indicator (indication of the average noise plus interference power measured when the channel is idle) PLME-ED.confirm EnergyLevel Explicit measurement of clear channel? Noise HistogramX

doc.: IEEE Submission September 2009 Tim Godfrey, EPRISlide 6 MAC Metrics FunctionExistingNeededNice to have Retry CountX Multiple Retry CountX Transmit Failure CountX FCS Error CountX Duplicate Frame CountX ACK Failure CountX Successful RX frame countX Successful TX frame countX Security Failure countX These counters are accessed as new MAC PIB Attributes

doc.: IEEE Submission September 2009 Tim Godfrey, EPRISlide 7 Statistics Handling PHY-related metrics are associated with specific devices by correlating with source address It is not mandatory to maintain tables of measurements (per address) within the MAC –Metrics are passed directly to higher layers for use by fragmentation (MTU) decision algorithm

doc.: IEEE Submission September 2009 Tim Godfrey, EPRISlide 8 For further consideration Is there a need to convey metrics over the wireless link? I.E. is it necessary for a coordinator to request metrics from a device? –This would require defining new frame formats Do we need to provide a reset function for MAC stat counters? –Can we leave it to upper layers to calculate differences and note when wrap around occurs? How many bits are needed for each counter? –Answer depends on how often upper layers will check counters, and rate of incrementing.