1. Migration and Travel to Work in the Glasgow Conurbation 1991-2001 Jan Freeke Glasgow City Council

2. Difficulties in Comparison 1991 and 2001 Importance of context Start asylum seeker contract in 2000/2001, high rate of imputation Migration: origin value one year ago can be different from current destination value (e.g. tenure and economic status) Students counted at home address in 1991 and at term-time address in 2001 Uncertainty on travel to place-of-work or place-of-study for full-time students in employment Only 10% of workplace addresses coded in 1991 Different social classification: Social class and SEG in 1991 and NSec in 2001

3. Migration: Summary of Findings 2001 migration pattern Glasgow and rest of conurbation Glasgow City Loses short distance migrants Gains long distance migrants Gains 16-29 year old Gains students/loses employed retired/other econ. inactive residents Loses families Gains people living on their own Loses owner occupiers Gains private renters Rest of Conurbation Gains short distance migrants Loses long distance migrants Gains children, 30-44 year old and pensioners Loses students and employed residents Gains families Loses people living on their own Gains owner occupiers Evidence suggests little change over 1991-2001

4. Travel-to-Work – General Context Change in number of employed working in: Glasgow+1%including FT students+8% Rest GCV+4%including FT students+8% GCV+3%including FT students+8% Employment in conurbation Share of Glasgow employment from 44.5% in 1991 to 43.6% in 2001 Share of Glasgow residents from 28.3% in 1991 to 27.6% in 2001 from/to rest GCVfrom/to outside GCV Into Glasgow+0%+24% Out of Glasgow+8%+18% Increase in long distance commuting Net in-commuting: decrease with rest GCV and increase with outside GCV area

5. Travel-to-Work – Industry (1)

6. Travel-to-Work – Industry (2)

7. Travel-to-Work – Industry (3) Changes 1991-2001 Mining, Manufacturing and Utilities Change of number of employed working in: Glasgow-34%-17,100 Rest GCV-22%-21,600 GCV-26%-38,700 Employment in GCV area: Share of employment in Glasgow from 34% in 1991 to 30% in 2001 Share of Glasgow residents from 23% in 1991 to 20% in 2001

8. Travel-to-Work – Industry (4) Changes 1991-2001 Banking, Finance, Insurance, Business Services and Leasing Change of number of employed working in: Glasgow+49%+22,600 Rest GCV+104%+26,400 GCV+69%+49,000 Employment in GCV area: Share of employment in Glasgow from 64% in 1991 to 57% in 2001 Share of Glasgow residents from 29% in 1991 to 30% in 2001

9. Travel-to-Work – Social Class (1)

10. Travel-to-Work – Social Class (2)

11. Travel-to-Work – Social Class (3) Changes 1991-2001 Professional, etc. Occupations Change of number of employed working in: Glasgow+17%+3,300 Rest GCV+7%+1,100 GCV+13%+4,400 Employment in GCV area: Share of employment in Glasgow from 58% in 1991 to 60% in 2001 Share of Glasgow residents from 29% in 1991 to 34% in 2001

12. Travel-to-Work – Social Class (4) Changes 1991-2001 Unskilled Occupations Change of number of employed working in: Glasgow-35%-6,800 Rest GCV-23%-6,800 GCV-28%-13,600 Employment in GCV area: Share of employment in Glasgow from 40% in 1991 to 36% in 2001 Share of Glasgow residents from 36% in 1991 to 31% in 2001

13. Travel-to-Work – Social Class (5) Difference actual minus average employed Glasgow Residents by Social Class 1991 2001

14. Travel-to-Work – Age (1)

15. Travel-to-Work – Age (2)

16. Travel-to-Work – Age (3) Changes 1991-2001 Age 60+ Change of number of employed working in: Glasgow-17%-2,400 Rest GCV+11%+1,800 GCV-2%-600 Employment in GCV area: Share of employment in Glasgow from 46% in 1991 to 39% in 2001 Share of Glasgow residents from 33% in 1991 to 25% in 2001

17. Travel to Work: Summary of Findings Commuting pattern Glasgow and rest of conurbation Changes 1991-2001 Glasgow residents: Lower share of manufacturing employment Slightly higher share of financial services employment Higher share of professional occupations Lower share of unskilled occupations Fewer elderly (age 60+) in the workforce Changes affect the geographical pattern of commuting with: a reduced net inflow from East Dunbartonshire and East Renfrewshire a greater net inflow from West Dunbartonshire and Renfrewshire