1. John Carwardine 20 April 09 Preliminary planning for Aug/Sept studies

2. Schedule Aug 17 @ 0700 to Sept 7 @ 0700 (3 weeks) –Tunnel open during the day for dump line vacuum repair –Tunnel closed during evening/overnight to allow non- beam testing (maybe 1-2 bunches to intermediate dump) Sept 7 @ 0700 to Sept 21 @ 0700 (2 weeks) –24/7 dedicated 9mA studies Sept 21 @ 0700: beginning of FLASH shutdown

3. Aug/Sept 2009 studies planning

4. Categories of activities Installation during 3-week shutdown Test / operation overnight during 3-week shutdown Machine setup/commissioning f0r 9mA studies Main studies (high current, long pulses, high gradient) Additional dedicated 9mA studies

5. Initial list of studies topics for Aug/Sept Machine monitoring & protection, interlocks Machine setup Gun/injector optimization Bypass optics model validation Operation with high gradient Operation with full beam loading RF power overhead Energy stability Piezo compensation … We should identify study-topic leaders who can take ownership for planning and running the particular studies

7. Energy Stability study Goal: measure performance, and characterize limitations under full beam loading conditions –Stability within bunch train vs pulse to pulse –Systematic vs random effects –Impact of running close to saturation on klystron –Impact of running close to gradient limits –LLRF hardware/firmware performance limitations RDR rf stability tolerances (RDR Table 3.9-1):

8. RF power overhead studies RF power is a cost driver for the ILC To study… –What power overhead is needed meet spec over extended operations periods? (RDR design uses 14%) –How effectively we can minimize static detuning errors –How well we can compensate Lorentz-force detuning –How close to saturation before klystron linearization is dominated by errors and regulation becomes unstable More than can be done in Sept: should be able to start bounding the problem

9. Detuning compensation study using piezos Piezo tuners are installed and operational at ACC56 Detuning compensation will be needed for 9mA test to reach high gradients with full beam loading Uncompensated Compensated Residual detuning from linear compensation FillingFlat top Discharge K. Przygoda Example: Module 6, Cavity 3 at 35MV/m) Feed-forward compensation has been demonstrated on FLASH at up to 35MV/m but with low beam loading We plan to study operation and evaluate performance with full beam loading

10. Start-up activities Commissioning without beam Gun/laser commissioning at 3MHz Gun/injector tune-up for 3nC/bunch at 3MHz Re-establish beam operation with 3nC/bunch MPS / beam loss monitor re-validation Test new beam loss monitors in dump line Validation of optics model for bypass and dump line Single bunch energy spread measurements

11. Preparatory work prior to August LLRF system upgrades at ACC456 (ACC23) –Upgrade hardware to latest generation (SimconDSP) –Upgrade rf signal down-converters for higher IF –Algorithm improvements: beam loading compensation, feed- forward waveform generation, … –LLRF system modeling, study planning Optics work –Improve alignment between model and measured lattice –Improve understanding of loss points and apertures –Refine the bypass lattice –Develop a methodical tuning process, online physics model Prepare gun laser and timing system for operation with a 3MHz bunch rate: install pockel cells, timing system