1. Results – Influencing Factors Wd frm,wd/stucco sdR conc frm,CIP conc &wd stud wallsR conc frm,CIP conc &CB/BR wallsConc frm,precast panelsR conc & stl frm,CIP conc/BR/curtain wallR conc frm,CIP conc &wood? R conc frm,CIP conc &CB walls

5. Residences (same as previous slide) Wood and concrete trends Discussed bldgs: Geography, fairview, thunderbird Vs. concrete dominant Uncertainty:AERL type factors (Caution of special case program limitations, may want to customize the analysis) AERL 77 percent of construction waste diverted from the landfill (NOT IN SCOPE) AERL contains 24 percent recycled materials and 46% of all the materials used are regionally manufactured Simplification of an analysis Does everyone have their final bldg materials on Agg summary measures final 3? YES Who had the most bldgs in a complex? TOTEM, FAIRVIEW, Most windows? MARINE DRIVE FSC minimal const details?

6. Differences Between Residential and Academic Buildings (Sq. Ft. Basis) Why the inconsistency between energy/resource use and other measures? (note cards) Add zoom in of P energy and resources

7. Differences between residential and academic buildings Primary energy and resources use greater for residential due to partitioning, lower ceiling heights, higher amounts of fenestration The subject impact categories greater in academic due to the nature of the building function.. Many more acoustic barriers (sheathings, insulations) items containing higher VOC’s etc Conc. Block for partitioning found in many academic buildings, not common in residential More use of steel in Aca bldgs? Ratio’s office space, lab space, lecture theaters, Discuss potential of other functional units eg. CF approach, occupant approach, Different ideas for modeling Methods of modeling bldg groups Would be very interesting to make a relation of lineal footage of partitioning per SF to see how this corresponds with summary measures

8. Delete slide INTRODUCE LAURENT Academic GeographyHenningsBuchananHRMacMillanCEMEFSCAERLAverage Impact CategoryUnits192519451958,19601967197619982004 Primary Energy ConsumptionMJ76.27143.08208.21481.71236.82387.30362.90270.90 Weighted Resource Usekg35.12123.94149.88294.62120.27270.84144.03162.67 Global Warming Potential (kg CO2 eq / kg)3.8713.0719.4642.7218.3829.8328.6022.27 Acidification Potential(moles of H+ eq / kg)1.454.536.4313.855.317.609.066.89 HH Respiratory Effects Potential(kg PM2.5 eq / kg)0.010.050.060.110.040.070.100.06 Eutrophication Potential(kg N eq / kg)0.00 Ozone Depletion Potential(kg CFC-11 eq / kg)0.00 Smog Potential(kg NOx eq / kg)0.010.070.100.190.090.110.120.10