1. Universität Kaiserslautern Institut für Technologie und Arbeit / Institute of Technology and Work Evaluation: Timetable & Approach October 2001: –Internal project evaluation (Virtual project meeting) November 2001: –Evaluation report (+ project progress report) Approach: –Guiding questions: derived from the proposal (chapter 3.8) –Assumption: Most „answers“ can be derived from the preliminary report (August 2001) –Additional „continuous improvement process“ (?): Internal „survey“ with regard to some criteria 7/01, 12/01, 5/02

2. Universität Kaiserslautern Institut für Technologie und Arbeit / Institute of Technology and Work „Effectiveness“ (1) Coverage of the foci of interest ITA/FORTH: technology & business focus is the technology AND business focus adequately covered by –the questionnaire? –the case study design? –the selection of case study candidates? –(the address pool for the broad survey?)

3. Universität Kaiserslautern Institut für Technologie und Arbeit / Institute of Technology and Work „Effectiveness“ (2) Coverage of the 3 main target areas: employment, vocational training, education are the three target areas adequately covered by –the address pool? –the feedback rate / sample structure –the case study candidates? is the questionnaire design appropriate for all the three target areas? is the case study design appropriate for all the three target areas?

4. Universität Kaiserslautern Institut für Technologie und Arbeit / Institute of Technology and Work Effectiveness“ (3) Identification of good-practice examples according to „widely accepted indicators“ (validity) does the questionnaire focus on inclusive design? -e.g., consideration of relevant target groups, user involvement, standards... is the process of selecting case study candidates guided by the focus on inclusive design? does the case study design focus on inclusive design ?

5. Universität Kaiserslautern Institut für Technologie und Arbeit / Institute of Technology and Work „Efficiency“ (1) Management are precise workplans with milestones –created? –monitored? –changed/updated if necessary?

6. Universität Kaiserslautern Institut für Technologie und Arbeit / Institute of Technology and Work „Efficiency“ (2) Communication regular project meetings? provision of a web site with information on the project progress with a ‘participants-only’ area? usage of electronic communication? usage of telephone communication?

7. Universität Kaiserslautern Institut für Technologie und Arbeit / Institute of Technology and Work Further criteria / issues „Quality“ of the survey (development) –sources (conferences, fairs, databases, mailing lists,...) –pre-tests –participants‘ comments –feedback rate Additional/accompanying scientific activities (?) –conferences –related publications