1. The National Water Quality Monitoring Network for U.S. Coastal Waters and their Tributary Rivers http://water.usgs.gov/wicp/acwi_intranet/monitoring/network/design/ Advisory Committee on Water Information January 18, 2006

2. Proposed ACWI Action: Suggest needed revisions Approve report or agree upon plan to approve report Convey to CEQ and NSTC Plan for next steps needed for implementation

3. I.Review history of the project II.Process for report preparation III.Overview of the report’s content IV.Next steps Presentation Outline

4. Background The Oceans Act of 2000 –Created U.S. Commission on Ocean Policy –To focus on: Protection of life and property Stewardship of resources Protection of environment and pollution prevention Enhancement of marine commerce Closer cooperation among government agencies

5. U.S. Commission on Ocean Policy 31 Chapters with 200+ specific recommendations Draft sent for review by 55 states and territories Chapter 15 Creating a National Monitoring Network

6. Chapter 15: Recommendations for “Creating a National Monitoring Network” 15-1: Develop a national monitoring network that coordinates and expands existing efforts, including monitoring of atmospheric deposition. 15-2: Ensure that the national monitoring network includes adequate coverage in both coastal areas and the upland areas that affect them, and … linked to the IOOS. 15-3: Ensure that the monitoring network has clear goals, specific core variables and an apporpriate sampling framework.

7. The Administration’s Response Created a Committee on Ocean Policy –Coordinate the activities of executive departments and agencies –Facilitate coordination and consultation among Federal, State, tribal, local governments, the private sector, foreign governments and international organizations Issued the U.S. Ocean Action Plan (December 17, 2004)

8. CEQ and NSTC Charge to ACWI Charge formally accepted by ACWI in February, 2005 Delegated responsibility to NWQMC Progress report to SWAQ in May, 2005 Progress report to ACWI in September, 2005 Task to be completed by January, 2006

9. 80 Participants in the National Water Quality Network Design

10. Design Features Clear objectives linked to management questions Linked to IOOS Linked monitoring of linked resources Flexibility over time Includes –metadata, –quality assurance, and –data management system that provides accessible data

11. The Design Will Not: Provide data on all water resources  Small rivers  Lakes and Reservoirs  Local aquifers Replace State Clean Water Act use attainments monitoring  305 (b)  303 (d) Deal with compliance monitoring

12. Structure of the Design Nine Resource compartments Fixed station and probabilistic designs Stations identified Parameters and sampling frequencies specified Provisions for data comparability, management & access A continuum of Observations Estuaries Nearshore Offshore and EEZ Great Lakes Coastal Beaches (BEACH Act) Wetlands With Flow and Flux from Rivers Atmosphere Groundwater

13. Constituent Categories 1.Physical: Flow magnitude and direction, physical habitat, sediments 2.Chemical: Inorganic: Water-quality characteristics, major ions, nutrients, metals and metalloids Organic: Bulk organics, volatile organic compounds, pesticides, halogenated hydrocarbons, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, contaminants with new and emerging concerns 3.Biological: Diversity, toxicity

14. Monitoring Estuaries 50Sites cover the IOOS Region 562Sites cover the 10 estuaries shown here 412Sites cover the 6 NEP estuaries shown here 520Sites cover the 5 states shown

15. Monitoring Near Shore 50 Sites cover each IOOS Region

16. Great Lakes Nearshore and Offshore Sites

17. Proposed Riverine Stations

18. Proposed Riverine Stations – Great Lakes

19. Coordination With IOOS Design proposes to involve the IOOS Regional Associations in managing some part of the proposed monitoring Design has a data management plan that is consistent with the IOOS Data Plan Design relies on IOOS plans for monitoring the Offshore compartment

20. A Network of Networks NMN will rely on existing efforts to extent possible Federal backbone can be augmented with state and local data that are network compliant National network at specified spatial and temporal density Additions and enhancements can be accommodated

21. A Network of Networks (continued) Conditions and trends identified at national scale State and local agencies continue to be responsible for detailed problem identification and source tracking

22. Metrics to Track Network Implementation Finalize design to determine the “whole” Complete inventory to determine what part is on-going Example: Streamgages –Need 258 sites at downstream point of HUC-6 basins –197 streamgages in place –METRIC: 76% of total in place

23. Network Data Management Design places major emphasis on storage and access –Built on ACWI’s Water Quality Data Elements for content, metadata –Assumes USGS and EPA data warehouses –Assumes web services will be the data exchange mechanism

24. Next Steps - Outreach Engage the broader monitoring community in dialogue about the Network Locate and inventory monitoring sites Negotiate the use of on-going monitoring efforts that might contribute to the Network as implementation Develop a set of status/implementation metrics

25. Next Steps – More Detail Finalize Network design details –Finalize the list of constituents and measurements –Define methods performance requirements –Schedule design of deferred elements Specify Network metadata standards Specify data system requirements

26. Next Steps - Resources Identify resource needed by federal and non-federal agencies for Network implementation Work to secure those resources