1. Patents and Utility Models (adapted from) Guriqbal Singh Jaiya Director, SMEs Division WIPO

2. What is a Patent? A right to exclude others from: making, using, offering for sale, selling or importing the patented invention Not a right to use the invention Quid Pro Quo: sufficient disclosure For 20 years from date of filing

3. A Common Misperception... Patents inhibit free exchange of information.

4. TO THE CONTRARY… The patent laws require DISCLOSURE of the structure of the invention, how to make and use it and the best mode of the invention. (35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph.) Patent applications are typically PUBLISHED 18 months after filing and in any event upon issue. An applicant is free to DISCLOSE the invention any time after the application is filed without jeopardizing patentability.

5. A patent right is NOT... A patent right is NOT... a right to perform the invention or a right to perform the invention or a monopoly in the marketplace. a monopoly in the marketplace.

6. What Can Be Patented Process or Method Machine or Apparatus Article of Manufacture Composition of Matter « Chemical Compounds « Physical Mixtures Improvements of Any of the Above

7. 35 USC § 101 Whoever invents...any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor,...

8. Requirements for Patentability USEFUL NOVEL NON- OBVIOUSNESS –Must have some utility; achieve some objective; not against public policy –Must be new, i.e., different from prior art –Subject matter as a whole would not have been obvious at the time to person of ordinary skill in the art

9. Parts of a U.S. Patent A.Specification – detailed description of invention and background B.Drawings – diagrams, flow charts, data (e.g. NMR, IR, etc.) C.Claims – define “metes and bounds” of invention

10. The Claims –Similar to a fence around a piece of property –Claim defines the metes and bounds of a patent holder’s property Claims of a Patent

11. Patent Claims The “Claims” of a patent define the scope of the invention. In the U.S., peripheral claiming is used. That is, the claim language defines the “edge” of the property right.

12. 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph tells what description must be provided to support the scope of a claim...

13. Structure of the Invention How to Make the Invention How to Use the Invention Best Mode

14. PRIOR ART LIMITS THE SCOPE OF PATENT CLAIMS The requirement for novelty of 35 USC §102 means that a patent claim cannot include what is already in the prior art.

15. Infringement “Infringement” of a patent occurs when a competitor makes, uses, sells, offers to sell or imports an embodiment of the invention without the permission of the patent owner.

16. Infringement claim Non-infringing embodiment Infringing embodiment

17. Infringement The typical remedies for infringement are:  Damages ($$$)  Injunction (stop use by infringer)

18. Patent Infringement Patents only cover those products or processes described by the claims An infringing product or process must have each element of the claim The accused product or process may have more than required by the claim

19. Working With Your Patent Attorney Inform attorney of what you know about the state of the art. What are the differences between your invention and the state of the art? What parts of the structure of the invention can be changed without affecting the way the invention is used?

20. Working With Your Patent Attorney What changes can be made in the materials and methods for making the invention without affecting the structure? What are the key structural features that produce the result of the invention?

21. Today computer programs are patentable as: A series of program process steps Can assert against the system user and indirectly against the system manufacturer A computer readable medium with the program process steps embedded in it Can assert against the manufacturer who provides infringing software on diskette, CD-ROM and the like Can assert against manufacturers who download infringing software Can assert against IC manufacturers who include infringing microcode in their chips Computer Program Patents

22. Methods of doing business (“business methods”) are patentable so long as they: –Produce a useful, tangible and concrete result Do not even need to be implemented in software Business Method Patents

23. Are Software Inventions patentable in Europe (EPC)? Yes, if…

24. Article 52(1) EPC –European patents are granted for inventions that : are new involve an inventive step are susceptible of industrial application

25. Article 52(2) EPC –“programs for computers” are not to be regarded as “inventions” (because they lack a technical character)

26. Article 52(3) EPC –exceptions listed in Article 52(2) have to be interpreted narrowly

27. Interpretation of the Boards of Appeal –computer-implemented inventions can be patented if they involve an inventive technical contribution to the prior art

28. Computer-implemented Inventions –Any invention the performance of which involves the use of a computer, computer network or other programmable apparatus and having one or more features which are realised wholly or partly by means of one or several computer programs.

29. 4 types of Computer-implemented Inventions –Technical processes describable without computer/software features. –Problem can not be solved completely without computer implementation. –Solution exclusively in the area of software. –Invention is a computer implementation of a non- technical process.

30. T 208/84 & T26/86 –a software for controlling or carrying-out a technical process is patentable

31. T 1173/97 & T935/97 –computer programs stored on a data carrier are patentable if there is a “further technical effect” (i.e., one going beyond the normal physical effect)

32. T 258/03 –a patent can not be granted if there is no technical contribution to the prior art

33. Non-patentable computer-implemented inventions –Internet retailing method –fixed-odds betting system (EP 1 139 245) –business methods

34. Patentable computer-implemented invention –an invention enabling the detection of the proper functioning of an ABS control unit (EP 771 280) –computer-controlled process for operating a robot arm

35. Patentable computer-implemented invention –computer-controlled process for enhancing a graphic display –computer-controlled process for controlling data storage between memories –computer-controlled process for routing diverse calls through a telephone exchange

36. Are Business Methods patentable in Europe (EPC)? NO!

37. Article 52(2) EPC –“rules and methods for … doing business” are not to be regarded as “inventions”

38. T 931/95 –pure business methods as such are not patentable

39. Conclusion –Patent protection of software is possible in Europe, but it is necessary to identify a technical effect. –Business methods are rejected by European Patent examiners.

40. Is Software patentable in the U.S.A.? YES!

41. Software: –Same as any other invention –Must be new, useful, non-obvious –Approximately 16’000 software-related U.S. patents each year

42. Acceptable software-related inventions: –Computer aided design software –Insurance and financial software systems –Debuggers –Operating systems –E-commerce solutions –Compilers –Business methods –etc.

43. Non-acceptable inventions: –Mathematical laws (e.g. Fourrier transform) –Laws of nature Processes based on these laws and implemented by computer programs are patentable, if new, useful and non-obvious.

44. Important for any patent application in the U.S.A. –Describe the best mode –Cite relevant prior art, including competing solutions

45. Important in particular for software patent applications in the U.S.A. –Use flowcharts –File early in the development process or submit source code (duty of disclosure)

46. Trends of U.S. Companies –Aggressive patenting of software development –Litigation increase (more than 2’500 lawsuits each year) –Huge damages (up to several millions dollars) –Negotiations (97% settle prior to trial)

47. Are Business Methods patentable in the U.S.A.? Yes, but…

48. Business method patents: –Highly scrutinized by the U.S. examiners –Long delays –Small percentage of U.S. patents

49. Conclusion –File –File early –Disclose everything that you know –Be ready to negotiate

50. Conclusion –Software patents in Europe: Yes, if… –Business method patents in Europe: NO! –Software patents in the U.S.A.: YES! –Busin. meth. patents in the U.S.A.: Yes, but…

51. International Protection Need to file country-by-country. Treaties facilitate international filings: –PCT Filings –European Patent Office Differences in protection: –Priority based on first to file. –Term of patent protection may vary. –Foreign countries may grant more limited protection to software patents. –Foreign countries may not recognize business method patents.

52. Patent Due Diligence Why Worry About It? Damages: –Lost profits –Reasonable royalties –Treble damages & attorney fees –Price erosion –Convoyed sales Disruption to Business During Litigation: –Document production –Depositions –Significant issue affecting business

53. Patent Due Diligence Why Worry About It? Costs of litigation “The cost to bring a patent case... ranges from $750,000 to $1 million for a simple dispute and from $4 million to $8 million for a modest one. Monster cases can cost $10 million or more.” IP Worldwide, May 2002, p. 43.