1. Zuzana Kukelova, Martin Bujnak, Jan Heller, Tomas Pajdla The Art of Solving Minimal Problems Tricks: One more point? Microsoft Research Cambridge Czech Technical University in Prague Capturing Reality s.r.o. CapturingReality

2. For practical applications sometimes more effective to use more than the minimal number of correspondences simpler system of polynomial equations can be solved faster, while maintaining numerical stability Find a balance between the number of samples used in RANSAC and the speed of the solver Usually one additional point is the best choice

3. Absolute pose of a camera with unknown focal length and radial distortion Minimal solution – P4Pfr [Josephson, Byröd. Pose estimation with radial distortion and unknown focal length. CVPR 2010] 4 point correspondences, 24 solutions LU - 1134×720 matrix, QR of a 56×56 matrix + eigenvalue computations of a 24×24 matrix Non-minimal solution – P5Pfr [Kukelova, Bujnak, Pajdla. Real-time solution to the absolute pose problem with unknown radial distortion and focal length. ICCV 2013] 5 point correspondences, 4 solutions null space of a 5×8 matrix, solutions to a 4 th degree polynomial + inverse of a 3×3 matrix 130x faster + numerically more stable than P4Pfr

4. Absolute pose of a camera with unknown focal length and radial distortion The comparison of the total times of model computation and 2000 tentative matches verification in RANSAC loop and different outlier contaminations for the P4Pfr solver and the P5Pfr solver

5. Relative pose problem for cameras with different radial distortions Minimal solution – F9 [Kukelova, Byröd., Josephson, Pajdla, Åström. Fast and robust numerical solutions to minimal problems for cameras with radial distortion. CVIU 2010] 9 point correspondences, 24 solutions GJ – 9x16 + 179x203 matrix + eigenvalue computations of a 24×24 matrix Non-minimal solution – F10 [Kukelova, Heller, Bujnak, Fitzgibbon, Pajdla. Efficient Solution to the Epipolar Geometry for Radially Distorted Cameras. ICCV 2015] 10 point correspondences, 10 solutions GJ - 10×16 matrix, determinant of a 4x4 polynomial matrix, Sturm sequences >1200x faster than F9