Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Richard Thompson and Nancy Densmore January 2007 2005 Stand Level Biodiversity Final Report “Proof of Concept”

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Richard Thompson and Nancy Densmore January 2007 2005 Stand Level Biodiversity Final Report “Proof of Concept”"— Presentation transcript:

1 Richard Thompson and Nancy Densmore January 2007 2005 Stand Level Biodiversity Final Report “Proof of Concept”

2 Question? Is the structural retention (WT and CWD) left associated with cutblocks adequately maintaining habitat for dependent species at the site and across the landscape now and in the future?

3 Stand Level Biodiversity What are we measuring? % area retained Tree size Wildlife tree class tree species CWD Size CWD decay class Ecological Anchors – e.g. large hollow trees, bear dens Windthrow Invasive Species

4 How are we measuring it? Standardized protocol Plot base and overview Randomized design Quality assurance Protocol Available on the Web: http://www.for.gov.bc.ca/hfp/frep/values/biodiversity.htm Standardized protocol Plot base and overview Randomized design Quality assurance Protocol Available on the Web: http://www.for.gov.bc.ca/hfp/frep/values/biodiversity.htm

5 2005 Provincial Sample Summary of retention levels (hectares) on 201 sampled cutblocks A Total gross block area6,916 BTotal patch retention area (includes 33 hectares of temporary patch retention) 932 CTotal dispersed retention area 1 (includes 99 hectares of temporary dispersed retention) 385 DTotal rotational Patch area 2 899 ETotal rotational Patch area 2 considered unconstrained 3 471 FTotal rotational dispersed area 1 2 286

6 Average Indicator Value by BEC BEC ZoneBlocks Sampled (ave % retained) Vet Trees #/ha of patch Ecological Anchors #/ha of patch Large Dead trees #/ha of total retention Large trees live and dead #/ha of total retention BWBS16 (15%)0.43.516.214.3 CDF1 (24%)124.20.451.8 CWH47 (24%15.55.128.174.2 ESSF14 (14%)0.51.863.716.4 ICH6 (30%)0.30.724.157.5 IDF20 (37%)225.71.99.7 MH3 (20%)2.7 46.493.6 MS7 (26%)33.02.55.7 SBPS15 (7%)00.626.00.3 SBS72 (14%)2.82.322.311.5

7 Distribution of baseline indicator data

8 Retained species abundance SBS blocks

9 WT class 3 or higher, dbh >30 cm and height >10m for 72 SBS blocks

10 Comparison of Data on Large Dead Tree Abundance for Kolmogorov-Smirnov test

11 CWD Patch/Harvest Volume

12 CWD Patch/Harvest Length

13 Categories of windthrow 70 SBS cutblocks

14 Patch location 69 SBS Blocks :

15 Summary Trend or indicatorGood for Biodiversity Risky for Biodiversity 13.7% overall retention (32% 30% retention) X 42% of blocks with large patchesX 9% of blocks with external non- contiguous patches X 7% of blocks with zero retentionX 84% of blocks have patch retentionX 63% of blocks with 3 or less tree species retained X 43% of blocks with few large treesX 51% of blocks with many large treesX CWD volume comparable patch to harvest area and baseline X Long pieces of CWD less common in harvest area compared to retention patches and baseline X

16 Where to Next? Data sets continue to be built Data Management Systems being built Work to build baselines Work to put stand structure into landscape Data sets continue to be built Data Management Systems being built Work to build baselines Work to put stand structure into landscape

17


Download ppt "Richard Thompson and Nancy Densmore January 2007 2005 Stand Level Biodiversity Final Report “Proof of Concept”"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google