Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

AAAC Jim Ulvestad December 1, 2012. Divestment issues  “Divestment,” in the parlance of the Portfolio Review, implies removal of a telescope from the.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "AAAC Jim Ulvestad December 1, 2012. Divestment issues  “Divestment,” in the parlance of the Portfolio Review, implies removal of a telescope from the."— Presentation transcript:

1 AAAC Jim Ulvestad December 1, 2012

2 Divestment issues  “Divestment,” in the parlance of the Portfolio Review, implies removal of a telescope from the NSF AST budget. This encompasses many options, all of which are likely to reduce or eliminate open-access astronomy research time 1.Divest to another operator, possibly with another mission 2.Develop funding partnership, possibly with mix of missions 3.Mothball 4.Close/deconstruct  Timescale for divestment decisions advertised as late 2013, to enable savings by time of FY 2017  Consideration of interagency partnerships follows various mixes of options 1 and 2 above  Strategy: interagency discussions about options/needs. If the other agency has interest, explore range of possible partnership models. Within agencies, determine how choices will be made among options. 2 12/01/2012

3 OIR System Definition  Long-term directions inferred from Portfolio Review Report  LSST should be at heart of OIR system  OIR system should center on >4m telescopes, with 4m telescopes being used primarily as supporting capabilities or survey capabilities  This leads to many questions  What does the post-2021 system look like, as a whole?  How do you make a transition to that system, and make the transition while continuing to deliver science capabilities along the way?  What are the opportunities to motivate private telescope operators to participate in an integrated system?  How much of the system is defined top-down vs. on a more ad-hoc bottom-up basis?  How is the system coordinated and managed?  How do Gemini and NOAO change over the next decade? 3 12/01/2012

4 Moving Toward the OIR System  Community self-organizing in workshops and other venues to determine best methods of doing LSST science  NSF and DOE discussing how DOE mission goals might be achieved using telescopes in the NSF part of the system  Given “Rocky-III” report, DOE has an idea of where the gaps are in their integrated program  Need community-led assessment of what we really want the system to look like post-2020 to deliver DOE mission science and NSF investigator science  Which telescopes, instruments, and observing methods best deliver the overall science capabilities and return? 4 12/01/2012


Download ppt "AAAC Jim Ulvestad December 1, 2012. Divestment issues  “Divestment,” in the parlance of the Portfolio Review, implies removal of a telescope from the."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google