1. Matt Braun Mary Mulcahy Colleen Mooney Lorraine E. Zlupko Organizations as Brains

2. The brain as a system engages in an incredibly diverse set of parallel activities that make complimentary and competing contributions to what eventually emerges as a coherent pattern (p. 75).

3. Organizations as Brains Metaphor Strengths Information Processing Brains  Networked intelligence  Limitless supply of data  Data-driven organizations  Human-based computation  Humans and computers work together to solve problems  Changing the divided brain paradigm  Left and right brain capacities are intertwined, not opposing Create Learning Organizations  Scan and anticipate change in the wider environment to detect significant variations (adapt or fail)  Develop an ability to question, challenge, and change operating norms and assumptions (double looping)  Allow an appropriate strategic direction and pattern of organizations to emerge (learn from mistakes)

4. Organizations as Holographic Brains Principle 1: Build the “Whole” into the “Parts” Principle 2: The Importance of Redundancy Principle 3: Requisite Variety Principle 4: “Minimum Specs” Principle 5: Learn to Learn

5. Organizations as Brains Metaphor Limitations Having to “evoke metaphors to elaborate the implications of a metaphor” (p. 111) – when discussing the Organizations as Brain metaphor we are forced to look at other metaphors to describe the first (ex: holographics and cybernetics) The possibility of “overlooking the important conflicts that can arise between learning and self- organization, on one hand, and the realities of power and control on the other” (p.114)

6. Real-World Connection Is it possible to design learning organizations that have the capacity to be as flexible, resilient and inventive as the functioning of the brain? Is it possible to distribute capacities for intelligence and control throughout an enterprise so that the system as a whole can self- organize and evolve along with emerging challenges? (Morgan, p. 72)

7. Organizational Need for Change………… The school organization has “grown” a great deal, moving from a struggling school to a STAR 4 center. It is imperative that knowledge and power become distributed in the organization. We have created these positive changes with a modified “machine” organizational model, but, it is time in our organizational growth to change our focus and mindset in order to continue our Continuous Quality Improvement goals.

8. Working toward change Watch for: *Resistance of status quo * Managers must be willing to truly let go Positives: * Building a Learning Organization * Requisite Variety - internal diversity * Corporate DNA Moving from a “Machine” to a “Brain” Organizational Structure

9. W Where the school is now… Machine Metaphor Change Process to Organization as a Brain Model

10. Where we want to be ---- Brain Metaphor Great degree of interconnectedness Distributed leadership Learning Community NOT imposing from above – communication and integration

11. Reconstructing the brain piece by piece and building a virtual brain in a supercomputer—these are some of the goals of the Blue Brain Project. The virtual brain will be an exceptional tool giving neuroscientists a new understanding of the brain and a better understanding of neurological diseases. The Blue Brain project began in 2005 with an agreement between the EPFL and IBM, which supplied the BlueGene/L supercomputer acquired by EPFL to build the virtual brain. (http://bluebrain.epfl.ch/page-56882-en.html) An Example of Interconnectedness…….. Blue Brain Project

12. W Both holographic and specialized (Morgan 73) Leadership, PELICAN, Work Sampling, OUNCE, STAR Requirements shared Distributed Leadership Organizational Diversity Brain Metaphor Where we want to move as an organization… Organization as Brain (modified for our school)

14. References Morgan, G. (2006). Images of Organization. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. The Blue Brain Project. Retrieved from http://bluebrain.epfl.ch/page-56882-en.html. http://bluebrain.epfl.ch/page-56882-en.html