1. Safety Information Sharing ICAO’s Perspective John Illson Air Navigation Bureau Flight Safety Foundation – International Air Safety Summit 31 October 2013

2. 2 The High-level Safety Conference / 2010 issued 48 recommendations including: New Safety Management Annex Support implementation of safety management requirements Integrate safety information from international general aviation Improve ICAO’s capability to integrate safety data and disseminate analysis Create methodologies for safety performance measurement Develop information sharing agreements Develop provisions for the appropriate protection of safety data Establish a framework for consistent and fair use of safety information

3. 3 Annex 19 – Safety Management Standardization Annex 19 – Safety Management Enhances safety by consolidating safety management provisions Includes provisions related to Safety Data Collection, Analysis and Exchange –Mandatory and voluntary incident reporting systems –Legal guidance for the protection of safety information –“Non punitive” reporting environment Safety Information Protection Task Force recommendations currently under consideration

4. 4

5. 1.Reduce the number of fatal accidents and fatalities worldwide irrespective of the volume of air traffic. 2.Achieve a significant decrease in accident rates, particularly in regions where these remain high. 3.No single ICAO region shall have an accident rate more than twice the worldwide rate by the end of 2011. 2007 GASP Safety Targets 5

6. 6 Safety Performance Enablers Safety Information Exchange Resources Collaboration Standardization Predictive Risk Modeling Objective Safety Management Objective Safety Oversight Objective GASP Framework

7. The Bigger Picture – Global Implementation Challenges VARYING NEEDS IMPROVEMENTIMPROVEMENT IMPLEMENTATION OF AN EFFECTIVE SAFETY OVERSIGHT SYSTEM FULL IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ICAO STATE SAFETY PROGRAMME FRAMEWORK ADVANCED SAFETY OVERSIGHT SYSTEM INCLUDING PREDICTIVE RISK MANAGEMENT Varying needs of States No “one-size-fits-all” solution Varying needs of States No “one-size-fits-all” solution

8. 8 Benefits of Aggregation

9. 9 Max 25% Min 50% 75% OperatorsAircraftAircraft Models 000 1 3 2 116 5 3 61 10 45 6051 55 Registration per State Passenger Operations

10. High Level Safety Conference 2015 10 Review GASP objectives and targets and provide recommendations for future adjustments Enhancing the exchange of safety information –Safety information protection –Harmonized safety performance metrics –Technical interoperability

11. Thank You 11

12. 12 Max 25% Min 50% 75% OperatorsAircraftAircraft Models 111 3 10 4 529 8 12 101 13 267 7320 72 Registrations per State