1. Kentucky’s School Report Card and Spreadsheets 2015 Workbook

2. Page 2 Spreadsheets for Profile, Accountability, Assessment, Learning Environment and Delivery Targets for 2011- 12,12-13, 13-14 and 14-15 are located under the Data Sets tab. KDE:OAA:DSR:clw 9/28/2015

3. Profile tab shows basic school/district information/location. Accountability tab shows all five categories of Next- Generation Learners with data based on 100 day students and Program Review accountability. Assessment tab shows data for all students tested on all assessments. Learning Environment tab shows school/district details and demographics. New Equity Tab has 5 separate measurements. Delivery Targets tab has targets for improvement. Page 3 Program Review tab shows all categories of Program Reviews for each school. Finance tab shows district level finances. Career and Technical Education tab shows program information. KDE:OAA:DSR:clw 9/28/2015

4. Accountability Tab Accountability Profile Tab click KDE:OAA:DSR:clw 9/28/2015 Page 4 click

5. KDE:OAA:DSR:clw 9/28/2015 Page 5

6. Accountability Profile Discussion Points What is our overall score? What is our percentile rank? (Remember this is a percentile not a percentage.) Percentile in Kentucky compares performance to the locked percentile generated in 2013. The locked percentile creates an overall score target for schools by level and districts to reach Proficient and Distinguished. What is our distance from the Overall Score associated with proficiency (70th percentile) and AMO for 2016? What is our Classification? Do we have a Rewards or Assistance Category? Are we where we want to be? KDE:OAA:DSR:clw 9/28/2015 Page 6

7. Accountability Tab Learners Tab click Opening page on Learners shows the five category tabs: Achievement, Gap, Growth, CCR and Graduation Rate. It opens automatically on the Achievement tab. Page 7 Weighted Score comes from Achievement, Gap, Growth, College/Career Readiness and Graduation Rate Points multiplied by the weights each has in Learners. Weighted Score Summary adds the Weighted Scores for each area. KDE:OAA:DSR:clw 9/28/2015

8. Page 8 KDE:OAA:DSR:clw 9/28/2015 5 Year Graduation Rate

9. Learners Questions Looking at the five categories, generalize what is seen. Looking at the weighted score, in which category do we score the lowest? Why? Looking at the weighted score, in which category do we score the highest? Why? Note: After identifying the category with the lowest weighted score, the next step is to click on the tab identified and drill down with further questions for each category. KDE:OAA:DSR:clw 9/28/2015 Page 9

10. KDE:OAA:DSR:clw 9/28/2015 Page 10 Accountability - Learners Tab - Achievement Tab

11. Accountability - Learners Tab - Achievement Tab - Grade Level Breakdown After picking a subject area, you can click on the specific grade levels to view further breakdown of the data. Use this to compare performance level by groups of students. Page 11 Remember: 1) Novice, Apprentice, Proficient, Distinguished(NAPD) Calculation comes from the formula: N=0; A=.5; P/D=1(Bonus of.5 is added if there are more distinguished than novice.) 2) Points come from the NAPD Calculation multiplied by the equal weight of content areas: Reading, Mathematics and Social Studies are 25% and Writing/Language Mechanics is 25% (Writing 20% and Language Mechanics 5%). 11 KDE:OAA:DSR:clw 9/28/2015 Science is included in the high school calculation. (EOC Biology)

12. Achievement Questions Which NAPD performance level shows the lowest percentage of students for reading, mathematics, etc.? Which performance level shows the highest percentage of students for reading, mathematics, etc.? What can we do to increase P/D while reducing N/A? (e.g., instructional strategies, increasing teacher training and professional development) Do any particular subgroups stand out as needing improvement more than others? (sample shows highest percent novice are students with IEPs) KDE:OAA:DSR:clw 9/28/2015 Page 12

13. Accountability – Learners – Gap Page 13 KDE:OAA:DSR:clw 9/28/2015

14. Accountability – Learners – Gap – Subject Breakdown Page 14 Remember: 1). NAPD Calculation for Gap comes from the percent of Proficient/Distinguished only in the Non- duplicated Gap Group. 2). Points come from the NAPD Calculation multiplied by the equal weight of content areas: Reading, Mathematics and Social Studies being 25% and Writing/Language Mechanics 25% (Writing 20% and Language Mechanics 5%). KDE:OAA:DSR:clw 9/28/2015 Science is included in the high school calculation. (EOC Biology)

15. Gap Questions In what content area are Gap students most challenged? In what content area are Gap students most successful? In what content area do we have the largest percent of P/D performance? How are we identifying our Gap students? By subject area, drill down to see areas for improvement and how we compare in the district/state. KDE:OAA:DSR:clw 9/28/2015 Page 15

16. Accountability – Learners Growth Reminder: Growth Points Total comes from average of Reading Percent and Mathematics Percent of students making typical annual growth (at or above the 40th Student Growth Percentile). Page 16 KDE:OAA:DSR:clw 9/28/2015 Science is included in the high school calculation. (EOC Biology)

17. Growth Questions Typical Growth is at the 40th percentile; what percentage of our students are not there in reading? Mathematics? Which subject has the highest Growth? What do Growth percentiles look like for students who scored Distinguished or Novice? (Refer to spreadsheet and student listing, to identify specific students.) What can we do to improve Growth for students below the 40th percentile? (Refer to spreadsheet and student listing, to identify specific students.) How does our school/district’s Growth compare to other schools/districts? KDE:OAA:DSR:clw 9/28/2015 Page 17

18. Accountability – Learners – CCR – Student Breakdown Page 18 Remember: Percentage of graduates College and/or Career Ready shows non- duplicated totals for a school. Bonus is added, if applicable. KDE:OAA:DSR:clw 9/28/2015

19. CCR Questions What are the criteria for the 3 categories – college, career or both? How many students were determined college ready? Career ready? Earned Bonus? How do we compare to other schools in the district/state? What is the college/career readiness percentage for specific student groups within our school? What are the implications for instruction and curriculum? Knowing what it takes to be CCR, look at ACT performance of current seniors. What can we do to get more students ACT ready? Are we using COMPASS/KYOTE? College readiness does not start in high school. What percentage of students are college ready in middle school? KDE:OAA:DSR:clw 9/28/2015 Page 19

20. Graduation Rate Reminder The 2015 5-year Adjusted Graduation Rate will be used in the 2015 Unbridled Learning accountability calculations, which is 20% of the Next-Generation Learners total score at the high school level. The 2015 4-year Adjusted Graduation Rate will be compared to the graduation rate goals that were originally released in the 2013 School Report Card (SRC) to determine if goal has been met. The goal was released in the 2013 SRC and repeated in the 2014 SRC. It used the 2013 4-year as the baseline to create a goal for every year till 2022. In 2022, the goal is 98%. KDE:OAA:DSR:clw 9/28/2015 Page 20

21. Page 21 Accountability – Learners Graduation Rate – Cohort Information Past cohort data can be accessed here. KDE:OAA:DSR:clw 9/28/2015

22. Graduation Rate Questions How does our Graduation Rate compare to other schools in our district? In the state? What type of interventions can be provided to increase student completion and persistence to graduation? Comparing Graduation Rate (cohort) to the disaggregated data presented on the Accountability Tab: Which groups of students had the lowest graduation rate? What strategies might improve lower group rates? KDE:OAA:DSR:clw 9/28/2015 Page 22

23. KDE:OAA:DSR:clw 9/28/2015 Page 23 Accountability – Program Review Accountability Reminder: World Language and Global Competency Program Review is new this year. (Reported only at high school.)

24. Key Points for Program Reviews Data are presented by school level (elementary, middle and high) and aggregated for the district and state. For example, a K-8 school will have both an elementary and middle school score. Only data from A1 schools are aggregated for districts and the state. Data presented are consistent with the Program Review rubrics. If a school entered a characteristic score that was not required, the data have been removed. If a school entered not applicable (n/a) on a required characteristic, the n/a has been changed to a score of 0. KDE:OAA:DSR:clw 9/28/2015 Page 24

25. Purpose of the Program Review Improve the quality of teaching and learning for all students in all programs Allow equal access to all students the skills that will assist them in being productive citizens Allow student demonstration of understanding beyond a paper-and-pencil test Ensure a school-wide natural integration of the program skills across all contents, beyond the program areas KDE:OAA:DSR:clw 9/28/2015 25

26. Program Review Questions Is your K-3 program meeting all the purposes? Which Program Review and standard is lowest this year? How can we turn our focus to the portion of our program that will do more for the students? Which Program Review is the highest? What are we doing to achieve this score? Look to the future: Which area of K-3 is the lowest? What can be done to raise the K-3 score for 2015-16? KDE:OAA:DSR:clw 9/28/2015 Page 26

27. KDE:OAA:DSR:clw 9/28/2015 Page 27 Assessment Tab Assessment tab offers data for tested students on state-required and other tests (i.e., Advanced Placement and NAEP).

28. KDE:OAA:DSR:clw 9/28/2015 Page 28 Assessment – State Required Tests - K-PREP – Middle School - 07 Under the Assessment tab you will pick either State-Required Tests or Other Tests. With the test of interest, select the disaggregated data you want to review. Clicking on the grade level breaks it down into groups. (Any spot with a triangle that is underlined is a link to disaggregated data.)

29. KDE:OAA:DSR:clw 9/28/2015 Page 29 Assessment – State-Required Tests – K-PREP – Middle School - 07 Use data found here to compare particular groups, to find high/low performing groups or to help identify where your school/district may want to add more focused attention. For individual student information, refer to the spreadsheets and student listing. For reporting category information from Pearson assessments, see School Summary Reports in PearsonAccess.

30. KDE:OAA:DSR:clw 9/28/2015 Page 30 Assessment – State-Required Tests – K-PREP End-of-Course End-of-Course data is broken down by subject, all students and by groups of students (M/F, ethnicity, free/reduced- price meals, migrant, LEP, disability, non-duplicated gap group).

31. Assessment – State Required Tests – ACT/ACT Plan/ACT Explore Page 31 Shown are the average scores and percent meeting each set of benchmarks. Then, use spreadsheets to find individual student information. KDE:OAA:DSR:clw 9/28/2015

32. Assessment – Other Tests – Advanced Placement or NAEP Page 32 Advanced Placement data is loaded as it becomes available from the vendor. NAEP data is general state level information, never school or student level. KDE:OAA:DSR:clw 9/28/2015

33. Delivery Targets – Proficiency/Gap Tab Page 33 Gap is located at the bottom when you drill down to all students. KDE:OAA:DSR:clw 9/28/2015

34. Delivery Target Questions (Proficiency/Gap) Comparing Proficiency Rates to the disaggregated data on the Accountability Tab: Which subjects have the lowest performance rates and for what grade levels? Drill down by subject and school level: Which gap groups have the lowest proficiency rates? What are you doing to close these achievement gaps? KDE:OAA:DSR:clw 9/28/2015 Page 34

35. KDE:OAA:DSR:clw 9/28/2015 Page 35 Delivery Targets – CCR Tab

36. Delivery Target Questions (CCR) CCR delivery targets are calculated using the CCR total without a bonus. Considering your school/district scores, where have you made gains (e.g., college ready or career ready)? Similarly, in order to meet future targets, where is there room for greatest growth (e.g., college ready or career ready)? Considering 1) the demographic distribution of students in your schools and 2)the disaggregated CCR outcomes presented on the Accountability Tab: Which student groups appear to have lower success rates? KDE:OAA:DSR:clw 9/28/2015 Page 36

37. KDE:OAA:DSR:clw 9/28/2015 Page 37 Finance Tab

38. Includes district level data only. Data are extracted from the Superintendent's Annual Attendance Report (SAAR), MUNIS via the Annual Financial Report (AFR), SEEK System, Tax Reports, and Professional/Classified Staff Data (PSD/CSD) files. KDE:OAA:DSR:clw 9/28/2015 Page 38

39. KDE:OAA:DSR:clw 9/28/2015 Page 39 Career and Technical Education Tab Aggregate Career and Technical Education Data is available.

40. Contacts KDE:OAA:DSR:clw 9/28/2015 40 General Questions Division of Support and Research (502) 564-4394 Delivery Questions Karen Dodd Bart Liguori (502) 564-4201 Equity Questions Jennifer Baker (502) 564-1479 Finance Questions Paige Patterson-Grant (502) 564-3930 Safety Questions Windy Newton (502) 564-4772 KOSSA Questions Sherri Craig (502) 564-4286 WorkKeys Questions Angie Fischer (502) 564-4286 ACT & EOC Questions Kathy Moore (502) 564-2256 Program Reviews Questions Jamee Barton (502) 564-2106 KYOTE Questions Steve Newman NKU (859) 572-5332 Paul Eakin UK (859) 257-6798 Graduation Rate/Cohort Questions Tina Logan David Curd (502) 564-2256