1. 1 DAPHNE PROGRAMME Italy team Maria Luisa Genta, Antonella Brighi, Annalisa Guarini

2. 2 DAPHNE II PARTICIPANTS: COORDINATORS: - M.L. Genta, A. Brighi, A. Guarini, Università di Bologna (Italy) PARTNERS - Smith (UK) - Ortega-Ruiz (Spain) - Buccoliero (Promeco-Italy) - Salmivalli (Finland) - Malaguti e Canevaro (Bosnia-Herzegovina) An investigation into forms of peer-peer bullying at school in pre- adolescent and adolescent groups: new instruments and preventing strategies (2007-2009).

3. 3 DAPHNE II Aims: 1.To investigate traditional bullying and cyberbullying among preadolescent and adolescent. 2.To implement new tools in order to investigate these phenomena. 3.To compare the incidence of bullying and cyberbullying among different Countries. 4.To indicate good lessons for Europe.

4. Method  A newly devised anonymous self-report questionnaire it has been used, adapted from questionnaires already used and validated in cyberbullying research  Questionnaires were carried out in a school setting, during school time and with teacher supervision  information has been provided on potential predictors including age, gender, ethnicity, living location, parents socio economic status and computer/mobile phone use

5. The Questionnaire Section 1: About you  Provided data on participants self esteem and loneliness. Questions were adapted from two existing questionnaires, translated from Italian into English.  Self esteem: Revised version of Melotti & Passini, 2002. Included six measures of self esteem: global, sport, school, body, peers and family.  Loneliness: Adapted from Melotti, 2006, included four measures of loneliness related to:  Parents – closeness to family  Peers – closeness to friends, members of their peer group  Aversion – how much participants like/dislike being alone  Affinity – how participants feel about being alone

6. Section 2: About your school  Series of questions relating to school safety and involvement Section 3: About bullying and cyberbullying  Based on existing questionnaire developed by Smith et al (2005), shortened and adapted by Ortega (2006)  Includes questions on involvement in four types of bullying: direct, indirect, through mobiles and through the internet  Provides data on characteristics of mobile and internet bullying, including: relationship between victim and bully, length of bullying and victims response  Includes a section designed to measure attitudes of bystanders, adapted from participant role approach The Questionnaire

7. * For the remaining subjects or age or sex were missing  Selected from Middle and High schools located in large, middle towns and villages. Year 8 (12-13) Year 10 (14-15) Year 12 (16-17) Total Males 136110689143343 (51,1%) Females 12589979413196 (48,9%) Total 2619206518556539* N= 6575 Participants in total, aged 12 – 17 Participants

8. Some results Cyber availability ITALYUKSPAINBiH No.% % % % Owns a mobile185995.9206593.8 157094.1 33394.7 Computer connected163583.5210695.0 137382.7 16045.3 Computer in bedroom94948.585138.4 64138.6 14039.7

9. 9 Some results ITALYUKSPAINBiH MeanSDMeanSDMeanSDMeanSD School safety1,310,461,200,49 1,460,43 1,180,48 Peer relations1,580,471,570,49 1,750,37 1,530,47 ANOVA analyses (Country as independent variable and school safety and peer relations as dependent variables):  School safety: Country effect F(3, 5780)=103,34, p<.001  Peer relations: Country effect F(3, 6019)=66,84, p<.001 School climate

10. Rates of victimisation in the last two months (N= 6575) Occasional (once or twice) Severe (several times a month/ a week) Total Direct bullying9.8% (641)5.0% (327)14.8% (968) Indirect bullying 14.0% (917)5.8% (377)19.8% (1294) Mobile phone bullying 4.7% (305)1.9% (124)6.6% (429) Internet bullying 4.9% (320)2.0% (127)6.9% (427)

11. Rates of bullying others within the last two months (N= 6575) Occasional (once or twice) Severe (several times a month/ a week) Total Direct bullying8.8% (577)3.3% (214)12.1% (791) Indirect bullying 11.9% (781)3.7% (243)15.6% (1024) Mobile phone bullying 3.9% (257)1.8% (120)5.7% (377) Internet bullying 3.2% (208)1.5% (99)4.7% (307)

12. Victimization (%) across Countries ItalyUkSpainBosnia H. Occ.Sev.TotalOcc.Sev.TotalOcc.Sev.TotalOcc.SevTot. Direct B.10,74,315,011,67,118,77,53,210,76,64,310,9 Indirect15,77,323,014,06,220,112,43,415,814,05,119,1 Mobile7,32,29,52,12,04,13,70,54,312,26,418,7 Internet5,31,97,24,02,66,66,21,37,54,61,56,1

13. 13 DIRECT BULLYING Higher percentages in UK both for the occasional and the severe forms INDIRECT BULLYING Higher percentages in Italy both for the occasional and the severe forms MOBILE BULLYING Higher percentages in Bosnia Herzegovina both for the occasional and the severe forms; in Italy only for the occasional form.. INTERNET BULLYING Higher percentages in UK both for the severe forms. For the occasional form, Spain results to have higher percentages. The Questionnaire Differences in victimization across countries

14. Bullying behavior (%) across Countries ItalyUKSpainBosnia H. Occ.Sev.Tot.Occ.Sev.Tot.Occ.Sev.Tot.Occ.Sev Tot Direct 11,14,415,56,63,49,99,02,211,1 2,313,4 Indir. 16,65,722,37,13,210,313,12,315,410,31,111,5 Mobile 6,42,79,11,01,52,54,20,95,17,13,710,8 Internet 5,11,66,81,51,12,63,61,04,62,92,35,2

15. 15 Differences in bullying across countries  DIRECT BULLYING Higher percentages in Italy both for occasional and for severe bullying behavior.  INDIRECT BULLYING Higher percentages in Italy both for occasional and for severe bullying behavior  MOBILE BULLYING Higher percentages in Italy and Bosnia Herzegovina both for occasional and for severe bullying behavior.  INTERNET BULLYING Higher percentages in Italy for occasional bullying behavior.

16. Concrete output

17. DVD 17

18. DVD 18

19. Concrete output From media….

20. 20 DAPHNE III PARTICIPANTS COORDINATORS - M.L. Genta, A. Brighi, A. Guarini, Università di Bologna (Italia) PARTNERS - Prof. Smith (UK) - Prof. Ortega (Spain) - Prof. Tsorbatzoudis (Greece) - Prof. Pyżalsky (Polonia) - Prof. Scheithauer (Germany) Cyberbullying in adolescence: investigation and intervention in six European Countries (2010-2012)

21. 21 DAPHNE III PARTICIPANTS: ASSOCIATE PARTNERS - Prof. Costabile (University of Calabria) - Ministry of Education, Science, Culture and Sport – Tuzla Kanton (Bosnia-Erzegovina, Prof. Malaguti e Canevaro) Cyberbullying in adolescence: investigation and intervention in six European Countries OTHER INVOLVED PARTNERS - Ufficio Scolastico Regionale dell’Emilia Romagna

22. 22 DAPHNE III AIMS 1)INVESTIGATION FOR DIFFUSION AND CHARACTERISTICS OF CYBERBULLYING IN SCHOOLS This activity will be performed in the first 10 months of the projects: 1. Revision and translation of the questionnaire (2 months) 2.Contact with schools and permission from families and ethical authorities (2 months) 3. Collection of questionnaires (2 months) 4. Coding and analysis of data in each Country and comparison among Countries(4 months) March 10 April 10 May 10 June 10 July 10 August 10 Sept 10 Oct 10 Nov 10 Dec 10 1XXXxXxXxXX 1.1Xx 1.2 Xx 1.3 Xx 1.4 xxXX

23. 23 DAPHNE III CONCRETE OUTPUT: Creation of a common questionnaire for the investigation of cyberbullying in 7 languages (6 languages for the partners and 1 language for the associate partner).

24. 24 DAPHNE III AIM 2) TESTING EFFECTIVE STRATEGIES OF INTERVENTION IN EUROPEAN SCHOOLS AND IN CONTEXTS AT RISK This activity will be performed in 12 months with some differences in the time schedule of the intervention among Countries: 2.1. Application of the intervention (10 months) on at least three schools with small groups of students, parents and teachers for each country. 2.2. Evaluation of the intervention and comparison among Countries (2 months) Sept 10 Oct 10 Nov 10 Dec 10 Juan 11 Febr 11 Marc 11 April 11 May 11 June 11 July 11 Aug 11 2XXXxXXXxXXxx 2.1XXXxxXXxXX 2.2 xx

25. 25 DAPHNE III AIMS: 3) DISSEMINATION OF THE MAIN OUTCOMES This activity will take place in 10 months: 3.1. Books and pamphlets in each Country and National and International articles (8 months) 3.2. National and International conferences (3 months) Final Report for the European Commission May 11 June 11 July 11 Aug 11 Sept 11 Oct 11 Nov 11 Dec 11 Jan 12 Feb 12 3xXxXXxXXXX 3.01xXxXXxXX 3.02 XXx Report x

26. 26 DAPHNE III CONCRETE OUTPUT: - Books and Pamphlets: at least one book/pamphlet in each Country for peers, teachers, parents (total: at least 6 books/pamphlets, 200 copies each). - Articles: at least one National article by each Country (partners and associate partners) in Psychological or Educational Journal and 2-3 International articles (total: at least 8 articles). - Website: updating of the website already created with DAPHNE II grant in order to disseminate the obtained results (investigation of the phenomenon and the intervention strategies).

27. 27 DAPHNE III CONCRETE OUTPUT: - National Conferences: at least one Conference will be held in each Country to present the main outcomes of the project (total: 6 Conferences). For each Conference we will expect about 200 persons and we will print advertising for the event and we organise a coffee break for convenors. - International Conference in Bologna will be held to compare different European intervention methodologies. About 400 persons will be expected to participate in this event. - Final report for the European Commission