1. Electronic On-Board Recorders The Canadian Perspective August 2011 Darren Christle BA, CITT, P.Log, MCIT Executive Director Motor Carrier Division Province of Manitoba

2. Yukon Northwest Territories Nunavut BC BC - British ColumbiaNB - New Brunswick AB - AlbertaNS - Nova Scotia SK - SaskatchewanPE - Prince Edward Island MB - Manitoba NF - Newfoundland ON - Ontario NT - Northwest Territories QC - Quebec YT - Yukon Territories NU - Nunavut Territories AB SK MB ON QC NF NB PE NS

3. 3

4. Current Environment CTA concerned & calling for mandatory EOBRs to level playing field CTA concerned & calling for mandatory EOBRs to level playing field 4

5. CCMTA Review Undertook a literature review Developed a discussion paper Solicited stakeholder input with key considerations  Application and implementation (scope)  Data requirements and privacy  Technically flexible or specific approach  Phase-in period 5

6. Consultation Input received from:  Carrier Organizations: CTA, Private Motor Truck Council, Motor Coach Canada  Owner Operator Independent Drivers Associations  Canadian Construction Association  Truck Manufacturers Association  Ontario Provincial Police  Manufacturers Input received from:  Carrier Organizations: CTA, Private Motor Truck Council, Motor Coach Canada  Owner Operator Independent Drivers Associations  Canadian Construction Association  Truck Manufacturers Association  Ontario Provincial Police  Manufacturers 6

7. Option 1 Option 2 Do Nothing – Continue to allow industry to adopt on a voluntary basis  No cost to industry  No requirement to develop standard  Inconsistent with US Develop targeted approach – direct to carriers in non- compliance with Hours of service  Similar to US approach  Targeted toward worst offenders Options 7

8. Options (cont.) Option 3 Option 4 Develop standard leveraging key aspects of US Rule  Utilizes work undertaken in US  Opportunity for CDN standard  Compatibility with US approach  Implementation can be independent or harmonized with US Develop universal mandate  Increased compliance with Hours of Service  Levels the playing field  Would force carriers to accept costs of EOBRs 8

9. Important Note Canadian stakeholders divided on universal vs. remedial approach 9

10. Council of Ministers Approval: Option 3: Develop a Canadian standard for EOBRs leveraging the work already undertaken in the US  Incorporates key elements of US rule  Provides Canada the flexibility to consider compatibility with the US Direct CCMTA to continue to monitor US rulemaking and implementation for Canadian carriers 10

11. Current Environmental Scan CCMTA has awarded a contract to FP Innovations Ltd. to develop a Canadian National Safety Code (NSC) standard on EOBR’s for CMV use in Canada. $80,000 The RFP referenced four deliverables –Deliverable 1 : Outline key elements of the standard; –Deliverable 2 : Preliminary draft of the standard; –Deliverable 3 : Final draft; –Deliverable 4 : Final standard. 11

12. 12 TaskDeadlineNote RFP out (contingent on Board approval, mid-April) April 21Bid deadline: May 27 Review/evaluationJune 27 Contract developmentJuly 1CCMTA Estimated startJuly 1Consultant work begins Deliverable 1 August 12 Outline of key elements of standard Deliverable 2 September 23Preliminary draft of standard Industry outreach on deliverable 2Sept 30 – October 14 - October CCMTA ReportingMid-SeptemberStatus report to Board CCMTA ReportingSeptember 22Status report to DM Deliverable 3 October 28Draft final standard CCMTA ReportingOctober 25Draft Final tabled with CRA Industry outreach on deliverable 3Nov 18 – December 2 Deliverable 4 DecemberFinal NSC Standard CCMTA ReportingDecember 9 Final tabled with Board (with approval to follow in January) CCMTA ReportingApril 2012Report to DMs

13. CANADIAN COUNCIL OF MOTOR TRANSPORT ADMINISTRATORS STANDING COMMITTEE ON COMPLIANCE & REGULATORY AFFAIRS 2323 ST. LAURENT BLVD. OTTAWA, ONTARIO, CANADA K1G 4J8 PHONE: 613.736.1003 FAX: 613.736.1395 EMAIL: CCMTA-SECRETARIAT@CCMTA.CA QUESTIONS?