1. Task Force Report on Collective Subscription of Korean Studies E-Resources March 24, 2010 Task Force on Korean Studies E-Resources

2. Contents Overview of Korean Studies E-Resources Overview of Korean Studies E-Resources Korea Foundation Support Korea Foundation Support Negotiation Process Negotiation Process Feedback and Suggestion Feedback and Suggestion

3. Task Force Report on Collective Subscription of Korean Studies E-Resources Overview of Korean Studies E-Resources Overview of Korean Studies E-Resources Mikyung Kang Harvard University

4. Task Force members Appointed by recommendations: Mikyung Kang Mikyung Kang, Harvard University Miree Ku Miree Ku, Duke University Sun-Yoon Lee Sun-Yoon Lee, University of Southern California Yunah Sung Yunah Sung, University of Michigan

5. Existing Korean Online DBs

6. Other Existing Korean Online DBs except two DB packages (EKS & Nurimedia)

7. Newly introduced DBs

8. Starting points EKS Options Nurimedia’s DBpia/KRpia: Became independent as of Oct. 23, 2009

9. Ending points Three years (Mar. 2010~Feb. 2013) 3% annual increase Simplified library groups

10. EKS negotiation process Starting PriceFinalized Price *15% increase *2009 Price: former group B, D, E Price *DBpia/KRpia included in the beginning *DBpia/KRpia excluded due to Nuri’s decision not to participate in EKS

11. Nuri negotiation process Starting Price * Became independent as of Oct. 23, 2009 Finalized Price

12. DBs for consideration Scholar by Kyobo E-article by Haksul Chǒngbowǒn New nonmun by Hakchisa Pukhan Haksul Database by CNC

13. Task Force Report on Collective Subscription of Korean Studies E-Resources Korea Foundation Support Korea Foundation Support Sun-Yoon K. Lee University of Southern California

14. Program Objectives Growing significance of online resources for education and research purposes To advance Korean Studies education and research worldwide To support to eligible universities to offset the subscription fees for the benefit of Korea- related scholars and graduate students To serve to complement the existing materials distribution program

15. Eligible Applicants Four-year universities that maintain Korean Studies department Korean Studies programs Korean language programs East Asian programs with a Korean component Need to make relevant e-resources available for faculty members and graduate students majoring in Korean Studies Expand the availability in 2010 (US, Canada, and Australia only in 2009)

16. Scope to Support Cost-sharing Up to 50% of the subscription fees Limited to $5,000 per year E-resources include online databases, e-journals, e-books and other online resources offered by public institutions or private parties, such as EKS, DBpia, KRpia, RISS International.

17. Recipient Institutions 41 universities 8 countries $300 - 4,500 / inst. $137,600 in total One year support Renewal of program is possible, based on overall demand and evaluation process CountriesNo. of Institutions U.S.A. 30 Canada 3 U.K. 2 France 1 Germany 1 Russia 1 Czech Republic 1 Australia 2 Total 41

18. Task Force Report on Collective Subscription of Korean Studies E-Resources Negotiation Process Negotiation Process Miree Ku Duke University

19. Timeline (2009)

20. Timeline (2010)

21. Google group: kseresource Discuss all related issues Archive all documents and information Manage negotiation process effectively http://groups.google.co m/group/kseresource http://groups.google.co m/group/kseresource

22. Numbers Total 1,607 discussions among Task Force members in kseresource google group Oct (353), Nov (429), Dec (160), Jan (451), Feb (160) and Mar (54) as of March 13, 2010

23. Numbers About 45 Q & As on Collective subscription of Korean e- resources from Feb 13 until now

24. Numbers 2010 Korean E-Resources Price ($) * * Up to 45% of the total subscription fees, but not to exceed $4,500 per institution

25. Numbers 2010 Korean E-Resources Subscription Korea Foundation Support

26. Negotiation based on… Trust building trust among the parties Productive Communication establishing productive communicating among parties, aiming for a successful outcome Clear Interest recognizing clear interests of the parties Win-Win Thinking finding a solution that is acceptable to all concerned parties

27. Task Force Report on Collective Subscription of Korean Studies E-Resources Feedback and Suggestion Feedback and Suggestion Yunah Sung University of Michigan

28. Issues in Collective Subscription Roles of the Task Force Selection of DBs and Vendors Participants and Group Classification Negotiation process and strategy Grant support Institutional supports on time, extra work, travel for a TF member

29. Feedback & Suggestions New Vendors & DBs New Participants Continuing funding support from Korea Foundation Long-term/stable model for Group deal Next term Task Force Subcommittee on Korean E-Resources under the CKM

30. Thank you for your support! Questions & Answers Libraries Users E-Resource Korea Vendors Foundation