1. Streamflow Information in Texas David R. Maidment Director, Center for Research in Water Resources University of Texas at Austin USGS Workshop, Fort Worth, Tx, 9 February 2005

2. Streamflow Information in Texas Texas as part of the National Streamflow Information Program Gage network analysis in Texas Streamflow information system

3. Streamflow Information in Texas Texas as part of the National Streamflow Information Program Gage network analysis in Texas Streamflow information system

4. Current Stream Gaging Network (~ 7000 gages)

5. Water Watch – Real Time Data (~ 5000 gages)

7. National Streamflow Information Program What gages need to be federally supported? Five goals with associated GIS metrics Recent National Academy report National Academy Press http://www.nap.edu

8. NSIP Goals 1.Interstate and International Waters (Borders and Compacts) 2.Flood Forecasts (NWS sites) 3.River Basin Outflows (Water Budgets) 4.Sentinel Watersheds (Regionalization and Long Term Trends of “natural flows”) 5.Water Quality (NAQWA, NASQAN,…

9. 1.Interstate and International Waters (515 gage sites) Metric: Operate a discharge station at rivers: on or near crossings of state and international borders where the drainage area of the river reach is greater than 500 square miles, or where the location is mandated by a treaty, compact or decree

10. 2. NWS Forecast Points (3244 Gage sites) Metric: Operate a streamgaging station at each NWS and NRCS forecast point that is not located on a reservoir

11. 3. River Basin Outflows (450 gage sites) Metric: Operate streamgaging stations near the terminus of each of the 352 Hydrologic Accounting Units (6-digit HUC’s) for water budgeting purposes

12. 4. Sentinel Watersheds (874 Gage sites) Regionalization and Long Term Trends in Streamflow (stations measuring natural flow in undisturbed lands) Ecoregion

13. 5. Water Quality (210 gage sites) Metric: Locate a stream gage on the same river reach as a permanent water quality monitoring site

14. All NSIP Stations (4424 gage sites)

15. Source of NSIP Gage Sites Active USGS gages 2796 (63%) Other agency gages 307 (7%) Inactive gages 837 (19%) New gages 484 (11%) 3103 existing gages (70%) 1221 inactive or new gages (30%)

16. Number of NSIP Gage Sites Texas (416) California (201) Colorado (171) Kansas (166) Rhode Island (2) Delaware (4)

17. Streamflow Information in Texas Texas as part of the National Streamflow Information Program Gage network analysis in Texas Streamflow information system

18. Stream Gages in Texas 1900 1910 192019401930195019601980 1970 1990 Daily Mean Flows Peak Flows 200 300 400

19. Existing: 312 daily stations, 17 annual peak stations 1962 1900 1910 192019401930195019601980 1970 1990 Back to 1962

20. Existing: 312 daily stations, 17 annual peak stations 1900 1910 192019401930195019601980 1970 1990 NSIP Goal: 416 daily stations NSIP Goals vs Existing Stations

21. Texas Stream Gaging Network Active Stations Discontinued Stations

22. Texas Gage Network Assessment Carried out by USGS and Texas Water Development Board (principal local cooperator) Goals –Regionalization – estimate flows or flow characteristics at ungaged sites in 11 hydrologically similar regions –Major Flow – obtain flow rates and volumes in large streams –Outflow from the State – account for streamflow leaving the State –Streamflow conditions assessment – assess current conditions with regard to long-term data and define temporal trends in flow

23. River Basins and Hydrologic Regions

24. Regional Optimization Model Based on Generalized Least Squares Regression – separates model error from error due to finite sample size Estimating mean annual flow and 25 year peak flow using basin characteristics with equations for each hydrologic region Three planning horizons (5yr, 10yr, 20yr) Active or discontinued stations in natural watersheds considered Start with all stations then step backwards, eliminating least informative station at each step

25. As number of stations increases, sampling error decreases until a minimum is reached As planning horizon increases, sampling error decreases 5yr 10yr 20yr Estimating the 25-year Peak Streamflow Mean Sampling Error Number of Stations

26. Results of Regional Optimization Stations on steepest part of the curve offer the most valuable regional hydrologic information relative to basin characteristics Sampling error increases as you go west and climate gets drier –Mean annual flow 6.6% to 114.3% –25yr peak flow 9.9% to 28.5% Much less error in regression equations for 25yr peak flow than mean annual flow in arid regions Greater variability in error between regions than by adding stations within a region

27. Flow Correlations Strong correlation in flows for upstream and downstream stations on the same river –61 of 81 station pairs analyzed for mean annual flow have correlation coefficient > 0.9 –43 of 129 station pairs analyzed for 25 year flow have correlation coefficient > 0.9 Select stations for core network that are not highly correlated with other selected stations

28. Interstation Correlation of Mean Annual Flow > 0.95 0.9 – 0.95 < 0.9 Correlation Coefficient

29. Figure 12 > 0.95 0.9 – 0.95 < 0.9 Correlation Coefficient Interstation Correlation of 25yr Peak Flow

30. Results of Texas Study Proposed core network of 263 stations for regional hydrology purposes in natural watersheds –205 active stations (78%) NSIP for Texas requires 416 stations –Border (10), NWS (345), Basin (36), Sentinel (87), Water Quality (16) (some gages serve multiple goals) Existing Gage Network of 312 stations Difficult to make comparisons between national and regional studies because criteria are different

31. Streamflow Information in Texas Texas as part of the National Streamflow Information Program Gage network analysis in Texas Streamflow information system

32. Streamflow Information System “The stream gaging activity is no longer considered a network of observation points, but rather an information system in which data are provided by both observation and synthesis” (Fontaine et al, 1984, “Cost Effectiveness of the Stream- Gaging Program in Maine”, USGS Water Supply Paper 2244)

33. Water Watch – Real Time Data (~ 5000 gages)

34. Streamstats

35. Space Historical daily mean discharge Streamflow statistics Real Time data Streamflow Information in Space and Time Time At Gages Anywhere on a Stream Future PossibilitiesCurrent Streamstats

36. Numerical Weather Prediction (North American Regional Reanalysis) PrecipitationEvaporation 3 hour time steps, 32 km grid, 1979 -- 2003

37. Real-time bacteria estimation Kansas River at DeSoto, KS

38. Point Design Model Gage Domain Site gages so as to accurately measure the vertical flux (e.g. precipitation) over a domain

39. Coverage Design Model Take a space and subdivide it into subspaces with an area for each point e.g. service areas of fire stations (goal of 4 min response time to a call)

40. NWS forecast Watersheds (flooding) EPA TMDL Segments (water quality) TCEQ water availability points (water supply) Guadalupe HydroNetwork Coverages of the Guadalupe Basin

41. San Marcos basin as a coverage model 1 2 4 3 5 6

42. Instream Flows in Texas Senate Bill 2 in 2001 Texas Legislature authorizes legal protection of instream flow Study program on selected reaches underway Review by National Academy Report released Feb 8, 2005

43. Senate Bill 2 Implementation is joint responsibility of TWDB, TPWD, TCEQ SB2 says: “… conduct studies and analyses to determine appropriate…flow conditions [that]…support a sound ecological environment.” Achieving this goal is scientific and institutional challenge for Texas

44. Instream Flow Studies Requires TPWD, TWDB, TCEQ to develop procedures for defining instream flow requirements Implemented on priority study regions by 2010 Based on aquatic life analysis Priority Study Regions Guadalupe San Antonio Brazos Trinity Sabine

45. River Reach Studies

46. Combining Flows and Biology Instream Flow Decision Making Hydrodynamic Model Habitat Descriptions Habitat Model ArcGIS SMS/RMA2Data Collection and some statistics Depth & velocity Species groups Criterion

47. Biological Gage A representative reach associated with a stream gage Regular monitoring for aquatic life assessment Scientific program for relating flow and ecological integrity

48. Conclusions National: number of stream gages steady, real-time rising Texas: number of stream gages declining since peak of ~410 in 1972 Losing 6 gages per year to less than 290 currently Texas National

49. Texas Needs 416 gages to meet national needs Texas (416)

50. Statistical studies have been done to optimize existing gage network > 0.95 0.9 – 0.95 < 0.9 Correlation Coefficient

51. We need flows to support lots of different watershed coverages TCEQ water availability points (water supply) NWS forecast Watersheds (flooding) EPA TMDL Segments (water quality) Guadalupe River Network

52. We face a major challenge to define instream flows