2. The Effectiveness of E- Portfolios with Ninth Grade Language Arts students By: LaRhonda Ware EDIT 6900 Spring 2011

3. Introduction

4. Research done on this topic Papert Students are more engaged when producing products for an authentic audience.Barrett There is a need to a need to focus on the K-12 student. Hsin Kai Wu and Ya-Ling Huang E-portfolios promote self-assessment and student reflection.

5. Statement of need? Technology does not always lead to successful learning environments for all students. Among the research there is no strong correlation between motivation and learning.

6. How does creating and publishing web- based portfolios impact learning for urban high school freshman? Research Question

7. Purpose of this study The purpose of the study is to determine the attributes related to creating and publishing web-portfolios that increase the motivation and academic success of urban ninth grade students.

8. Research Methods Teacher Volunteers- Participant Observers Materials for Instructional Units Questionnaires for Teachers Questionnaires for Students MC. assessment

9. References Barrett, H. C. (2007). Researching electronic portfolios and learner engagement: The REFLECT Initiative. [Article]. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 50(6), 436-449. Carraccio, C., & Englander, R. (2004). Evaluating Competence Using a Portfolio: A Literature Review and Web-Based Application to the ACGME Competencies. [Article]. Teaching & Learning in Medicine, 16(4), 381-387. Chi-Cheng, C. (2009). Self-Evaluated Effects of Web-Based Portfolio Assessment System for Various Student Motivation Levels. [Article]. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 41(4), 391-405. doi: 10.2190/EC.41.4.a Driessen, E. W., Muijtjens, A. M. M., van Tartwijk, J., & van der Vleuten, C. P. M. (2007). Web- or paper-based portfolios: is there a difference? [Article]. Medical Education, 41(11), 1067-1073. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02859.x Jackson, A. H., Jill Elaine. (2010). Preparing Teachers with Next Generation Technology Retrieved April 19, 2011, from http://www.phoenix.edu/uopx-knowledge-network/articles/case-studies/preparing-teachers-with-next-generation-technology.html#close=1 http://www.phoenix.edu/uopx-knowledge-network/articles/case-studies/preparing-teachers-with-next-generation-technology.html#close=1 Jones, B. D. (2003). STUDENTS AS WEB SITE AUTHORS: EFFECTS ON MOTIVATION AND ACHIEVEMENT. [Article]. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 31(4), 441-461. Ng, H. N. a. W. (2009). Engaging Secondary School Students in Extended and Open Learning Supported by Online Technologies. Journal of Research and Technology in Education, 41(3), 305-328. Papert, S. (1993). The Children's Machine: Rethinking schools in the age of the computer. New York: Basic Books. Rieber, L. P., Davis, J. M., Matzko, M. J., & Grant, M. M. (2009). Children as critics of educational computer games designed by other children. In R. E. Ferdig (Ed.), Handbook of research on effective electronic gaming in education (pp. 1234-1256). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference. Wickersham, L. E., & Chambers, S. M. (2006). ePORTFOLIOS: USING TECHNOLOGY TO ENHANCE AND ASSESS STUDENT LEARNING. [Article]. Education, 126(4), 738-746.