1. The Interpretations Process Membership Services Training

2. Overview Participants Types of Responses Process  Student-Athlete Friendly Philosophy  Screening Process Impact on Enforcement

3. The Interpretations Process? The rule is not clear Coach poses a question. NCAA staff provides an answer. Everyone’s doing it!!!

4. The Participants The Interpretations Process Enforcement Services Member Institutions Member ConferencesCCACA Membership Services Interps Committees Management Council ARS

5. Member Institutions Apply and enforce NCAA legislation. Administer its athletics program in accordance with the constitution, bylaws and other legislation of the Association.

6. Member Conferences Assist member institutions in applying NCAA legislation. Promote competitive equity by ensuring consistent application of the rules. Assist membership services staff by reducing volume of interpretations requests.

7. Membership Services Assists institutions and conferences in applying legislation. Issues three categories of responses:  Institutional Discretion.  Confirmations.  Determinations. Membership Services does not have the authority to adopt or approve legislation. Membership Services does have the authority to issue a binding staff interpretation.

8. Divisional Interpretive Subcommittees/Committees (e.g., LRIC) Issue official interpretations in response to requests from:  Institutions/Conferences.  Membership services staff.  Governance structure. Review all recorded membership services staff interpretations (screening process).

9. Management Councils Review all official interpretations issued by Sub/Committee. May issue official interpretations on their own. Institutions/conferences may appeal the Sub/Committee decisions to the Council. Council decisions are final.  Sub/Committee does not have the authority to revise an interpretation approved by the Council.  It can, however, recommend modification or reversal of previously approved interpretations.

10. Types of Responses

11. Is the Issue Interpretive? An issue is not interpretive if:  The plain meaning of the legislation is clear on its face;  The legislative history of the rule (including intent and rationale) clearly addresses the situation; or  A published official interpretation clearly addresses the situation.

12. Institutional Discretion Institutional Discretion: oIs not an "interpretation. " oIs provided when: 1.An issue or fact situation is not addressed clearly by the legislation or an official interpretation; and 2.The issue is not one of national significance.

13. Staff Confirmations A staff confirmation: o Is issued when the legislation or an official interpretation is responsive to the inquiry. o Is not an " interpretation. " o Is binding on all member institutions. Actions contrary to staff confirmations are considered rules violations. Recourse is to seek further review by divisional interpretive body or amend the legislation.

14. Staff Determinations A staff determination:  Is an " interpretation. "  Is provided when: 1. An issue or fact situation is not addressed clearly by the legislation or an official interpretation; and 2. The issue is one of national significance.  Is binding on the institution asking the question (and others who have knowledge). Prior actions contrary to a staff determination are not considered rules violations. Recourse is to seek further review by divisional interpretive body or amend the legislation.

15. Official Interpretations Official Interpretations: o Are rendered by the appropriate Divisional Subcommittee/Committee (e.g., Division I LRIC.) o Are binding on all institutions regardless of knowledge. o May be in the form of a confirmation or determination. 1. Determinations are binding from the issue date forward. 2. Confirmations are binding regardless of when the action occurred.

16. Screening Process

17. SCREENING PROCESS Divisional Interpretive Body Review of Staff Interpretations Staff issues confirmation or determination. Sub/Committee reviews staff interpretations Remains staff interpretation. May be appealed to Divisional Body. Committee reviews the issue and renders official interpretation. Interpretive Body Disagrees with Staff Interpretive Body Approves Staff Interpretation Official interpretations, review of staff interpretations or other responses may be appealed to Management Council. Committee agrees with staff and issues official interpretation.

18. The End.