Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Mixing From Stresses Wind stresses Bottom stresses Internal stresses Non-stress Instabilities Cooling Double Diffusion Tidal Straining Shear ProductionBuoyancy.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Mixing From Stresses Wind stresses Bottom stresses Internal stresses Non-stress Instabilities Cooling Double Diffusion Tidal Straining Shear ProductionBuoyancy."— Presentation transcript:

1 Mixing From Stresses Wind stresses Bottom stresses Internal stresses Non-stress Instabilities Cooling Double Diffusion Tidal Straining Shear ProductionBuoyancy Production

2 Mixing vs. Stratification To mix the water column, kinetic energy has to be converted to potential energy. Mixing increases the potential energy of the water column z z2z2 z1z1 Stratification from: estuarine circulation tidal straining heating

3 Potential energy per unit volume: Potential energy of the water column: But The potential energy per unit area of a mixed water column is: Ψ has units of energy per unit area

4 The energy difference between a mixed and a stratified water column is: with units of [ Joules/m 2 ] φ is the energy required to mix the water column completely, i.e., the energy required to bring the profile ρ(z) to ρ hat It is called the POTENTIAL ENERGY ANOMALY z z2z2 z1z1 It is a proxy for stratification The greater the φ the more stratified the water column If no energy is required to mix the water column

5 We’re really interested in determining whether the water column remains stratified or mixes as a result of the forcings acting on the water column. For that we need to study [ Watts per squared meter ]

6 B x and B y are the along-estuary and cross-estuary straining terms A x and A y are the advection terms C x and C y interaction of density and flow deviations in the vertical C’ x and C’ y correlation between vertical shear and density variations in the vertical; depth-averaged counterparts of C E is vertical mixing and D is vertical advection H x and H y are horizontal dispersion; F s and F b are surface and bottom density fluxes De Boer et al (2008, Ocean Modeling, 22, 1)

7 Burchard and Hofmeister (2008, ECSS, 77, 679) 1-D idealized numerical simulation of tidal straining

8 Burchard and Hofmeister (2008, ECSS, 77, 679) stratified entire period destratified @ end of flood

9 B x and B y are the along-estuary and cross-estuary straining terms A x and A y are the advection terms C x and C y interaction of density and flow deviations in the vertical C’ x and C’ y correlation between vertical shear and density variations in the vertical; depth-averaged counterparts of C E is vertical mixing and D is vertical advection H x and H y are horizontal dispersion; F s and F b are surface and bottom density fluxes De Boer et al (2008, Ocean Modeling, 22, 1)

10 Mixing Power From Wind The power/unit area generated by the wind at a height of 10 m is given by: But the power/unit area generated by the wind stress on the sea surface is: W * is the wind shear velocity at the surface and equals:

11 Alternatively, δ is a mixing efficiency coefficient = 0.023 k s is a drag factor that equals 6.4x10 -5 or ( C d u / W ) Mixing Power From Wind (cont.)

12 Mixing Power From Tidal Currents Can also be expressed in terms of bottom stress. The power/unit area produced by tidal flow interacting with the bottom is: But only a fraction of this goes to mixing ε is a mixing efficiency [ 0.002, 0037 ] C b is a bottom drag coefficient = 0.0025

13 Tidal Straining assuming the along-estuary density gradient is independent of depth, i.e., Considering advection of mass by ‘u’ only: We need u(z) from tidal currents to determine the power to stratify/destratify from tidal straining

14 Tidal Straining (cont.) Taking, 1.15 0.72 (Bowden and Fairbairn, 1952, Proc. Roy. Soc. London, A214:371:392.)

15 Tidal Straining (cont.) The water column will stratify at ebb as is positive, and vice versa

16 Taking again: Gravitational Circulation and using will tend to stratify the water column

17 Heating/Cooling In addition to buoyancy from heating, it may come from precipitation (rain) Δρ is the density contrast between fresh water and sea water P r is the precipitation rate (m/s) α is the thermal expansion coefficient of seawater ~ 1.6x10 -4 °C -1 c p is the specific heat of seawater ~ 4x10 3 J/(kg °C) Q is the cooling/heating rate (Watts/m 2 )

18 In estuaries, however, the main input of freshwater buoyancy is from river discharge. There is no simple way of dealing with feshwater input as specified by the discharge rate R because R is not distributed uniformly over a prescribed area (as is the case for wind, bottom stress, rain, heat). The alternative way of representing the riverine influence on stratification is by assuming that increased R enhances Δρ / Δx. This may be parameterized with Caution! Increased R does not necessarily mean increased gradients Assuming that each stratifying/destratifying mechanism can be superimposed separately:

19 Example: Let’s compare the stratifying tendencies of rain as compared to a low heating rate of 10 W/m 2 α = 1.6x10 -4 °C -1 c p = 4x10 3 J/(kg °C) H = 10 m If the contrast between rain water and sea water is 20 kg/m 3, then A precipitation rate of 1.7 mm per day is comparable to a heating rate of 10 W/m 2 Where can this happen?

20 Competition between buoyancy from Heating and mixing from Bottom Stress If stratification remains unaltered (or if buoyancy = mixing), For a prescribed Q, the only variables are H and u 0 If Q increases, u 0 needs to increase to keep H/u 0 3 constant If u 0 does not increase then stratification ensues H/u 0 3 is then indicative of regions where mixed waters meet stratified

21 Simpson-Hunter parameter H/u 0 3 ~ 1.6x10 4 / Q Line where mixed waters are separated from stratified waters. LOG10 (H / U 3 )

22 Bowman and Esaias, 1981, JGR, 86(C5), 4260.

23 Loder and Greenberg, 1996, Cont. Shelf Res., 6(3), 397-414.

24 M 2 ----------------- M 2 -N 2 ------------ M 2 -N 2 -S 2 -------- M 2 +N 2 +S 2 ------ Loder and Greenberg, 1996, Cont. Shelf Res., 6(3), 397-414.

25 Restrictions of the approach? Dominant Stratifying Power from Heating Dominant Destratifying Power from bottom stresses

26 Another example: Assume a system with Δρ / Δx of 10 kg/m 3 over 50 km = 2x10 -4, H = 10 m, A z =0.005 m 2 /s In order to balance that stratifying power, we need a wind power of: or a current power of:

27 Another example: Assume a system with Δρ / Δx of 1 kg/m 3 over 3 km, H = 20 m, A v =0.001 m 2 /s In order to balance such stratifying power, we need a wind power of: or a current power of:

28 From Heating/Cooling

29 From Density Gradient (grav circ)

30 Examples of successful applications of this approach: Simpson et al. (1990), Estuaries, 13(2), 125-132. Lund-Hansen et al. (1996), Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci., 42, 45-54.


Download ppt "Mixing From Stresses Wind stresses Bottom stresses Internal stresses Non-stress Instabilities Cooling Double Diffusion Tidal Straining Shear ProductionBuoyancy."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google