Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

How do we explain and apply theory to Social Phenomena

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "How do we explain and apply theory to Social Phenomena"— Presentation transcript:

1 How do we explain and apply theory to Social Phenomena
Paper Due Today Collect at the end of the band Theory Discussed and applied Begin Film today 3/8 Exam One Chapter 1, 4, Match up terms 25 Multiple Choice Review Self Quiz in the back of each chapter 3/12 Complete Film We need to Talk about Kevin 3/19 Seminar Families , Guided Questions and paper due your evaluation of “motherhood” We need to talk about Kevin 4/5 Amusing the Millions Seminar Guided Questions due , Use to discuss in Seminar your analysis of Coney Island 4/9 Women and Economics Due Answer the questions in details 4/16 Begin Era Presentations : Choose a group of 3-4 Choose an era 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, One Era per group Remit your groups names and eras to me by Friday 3/8 for approval Directions will follow

2 How do we explain social phenomena?
Conflict Theory How do we explain social phenomena?

3 Conflict theory vs Marxism
Conflict theory: power is the core of ALL social relationships Marxism: much like conflict theory but power is gained through economics Characterized by an economic struggle between the haves and have-nots. Your examples :

4 Conflict Theory Alternative to functionalism
Macrosociological theoretical perspective Resentment and hostility are constant elements of society Power differences among social classes Special interest groups fight over scarce resources of society Interest groups fight to gain advantages over others Give an example

5 Conflict Theory (Cont’d)
Competition puts society off-balance until dominant group gains control and stability through power How is this theory expressed in politics? Sex roles, sports, business

6 Influences Karl Marx (1818-1883)
Humanist: wanted all individuals to reach their full human potential Believed humans make their own history (historical method) Controlling material production division of labor formation of economic social classes Class struggle Trying to combine material and ideal factors/ structural and cultural factors

7 Marx (cont’d) Society was a two-class system:
Bourgeoisie (owners of the means of production) Proletariat (workers)

8 Marx (cont’d) Class differences have a lot to do with possession of personal property Believed the exploited would become conscious and unite communism  elimination of class struggle Main ideas behind communism are stated in the communist manifesto

9 Max Weber ( ) Agreed with Marx (economics played a central role in power distinction). Believed in Two other factors: Social prestige (status) Example: someone could be poor and still hold a lot of power because of social prestige  Mother Theresa Political influence Example: Politician who has great power, but does not earn a big salary

10 Max Weber (cont’d) Weber defined power as “the ability to impose one’s will on another, even when the other objects” (p. 72 CST) Authority: legitimate power; used with consent of the ruled Distribution of power and authority = basis of social conflict HOWEVER: if subordinates believe in the authority= avoided conflict If authority is not recognized as a legitimate= conflict Give an example:

11 Max Weber (cont’d) People with power want to keep it
People w/out power want to seek it 3 types of authority: Rational-legal Traditional Charismatic Give examples of people who have gained power, keep power through the types of authority listed above

12 Your activity Based on the different sociological perspectives/theory
Apply a theory to the hypothetical and explain why your group used that perspective. Make a hypothetical : choose a theory to explain.

13 Begin Film We need to Talk about Kevin
Guided questions: on Line and hard copy remitted Paper due 3/19 Seminar on families Read Chapter 14 by that date, discuss film How does “the family” influence who we are?

14 Georg Simmel (1858-1918) Wanted to develop a mathematics of society
Collection of statements about human relationships and social behavior Disagreed with Marx that social classes are formed horizontally There are differences in power and opinions within each group.

15 Georg Simmel (1858-1918) Concepts and contributions:
Rejects organic theory Saw society as the sum of individual interaction The most important relationship is between leaders and followers, superior and subordinates Superiordinate and subordinate have a reciprocal relationship

16 Georg Simmel ( ) Believed social action always involves harmony and conflict, love and hatred (p.74) Secrecy: people who hold secrets are in a position of power. Some groups are formed around secrets and are known as secret societies are usually in conflict with the greater society Initiation creates hierarchy

17 Modern Conflict Theory
Ideas of Marx, Weber, and Simmel resurfaced in America in the 1950’s through two German Sociologists: Lewis Coser Ralph Dahrendorf

18 Lewis Coser ( ) Defined conflict as “a struggle over values and claims to scarce status, power and resources in which the aims of the opponents are to neutralize, injure, or eliminate their rivals.” Conflicts between intergroups and intragroups are part of social life

19 Lewis Coser ( ) Conflict is part of relationships and is not necessarily a sign of instability Conflict serves several functions: Leads to social change Can stimulate innovation During times of war threat, can increase central power

20 Lewis Coser ( ) Explored sixteen propositions of conflict through functions Thought that conflict= boundaries between different groups unity between individual members of that group and determines boundaries of power

21 Ralf Dahrendorf (1929- ) Social order is maintained by force from the top Tension is constant Extreme social change can happen at any time “there cannot be conflict unless some degreee of consensus has already been established” (p. 89) Once reached, conflict temporarily disappears

22 C. Wright Mills (1916-1962) Work centered around power
Several dimensions of inequality (like Weber) Power can be independent from economic class Version of conflict theory-closer to Weber’s than Marx

23 C. Wright Mills ( ) Concept of power elite, rather than ruling class=difference between Marx and Mills There is a triangle of power: Military Industry Politics White-collar world kept power elite on top

24 C. Wright Mills (1916-1962) There are three types of power:
Authority: power justified by the beliefs of the voluntarily obedient Manipulation: power wielded unknown to the powerless Coercion: the “final” form of power, where the powerless are forced to obey the powerful

25 Randall Collins (1941- ) “power and status are fundamental relational dimensions at the micro level of social interaction and perhaps at the macro level as well” (p. 96) Collins believes there are certain goods that every group wants to pursue Wealth, power, and prestige “Concluded that coercion and the ability to “force” others to behave a certain way are the primary basis of conflict” (p.96)

26 Randall Collins (1941- ) Had a stratified approach to conflict that had 3 basic principles and 5 principles of conflict analysis

27 Relevancy Maintains that what social order does, is the result of power elites’ coercion of masses Those without power seek social change Two class system by Marx Contemporary conflict theorists don’t limit power to just economics, but also look at other issues

28 Relevancy (cont’d) Three criticisms of conflict theory:
Ignores other ways (i.e. non-forceful ways in which people reach agreements Sides with people who lack power Focuses on economic factors as the sole issue for all conflict in society This primarily is for Marx’s approach

29 Relevancy (cont’d) Differences in power are in all types of interaction Power used to be physical, but now, it’s legal and economic


Download ppt "How do we explain and apply theory to Social Phenomena"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google