1. 1 SBAS Implementation in the regions of ACAC and ASECNA Project with Community research funding Al-Hoceima Demonstration

2. SIRAJ Final Workshop - Rabat 28th May 2012 Summary of the activities Introduction: Why Al-Hoceima? RNAV GNSS Procedure design Flight Validation Campaign Business Case (Egisavia) Safety Case (Navya) Lessons learned

3. SIRAJ Final Workshop - Rabat 28th May 2012 Introduction: Why Al-Hoceima? First intention was to design, validate and operationally implement an APV SBAS procedure in Casablanca AD. However the on-going installation of a new ILS for RWY 17R made us to reconsider the situation: The APV SBAS procedures in ILS-equipped runways are used only as a back-up The advantages of APV SBAS procedures are much more tangible in small and medium airports with no ILS In particular, Al-Hoceima AD presented the following characteristics: Small airport with only VOR/DME approaches Challenging scenario, with MDH of NPA rounding 2000 ft Low traffic figures: chance for traffic growing evident Interest of RAM Better EGNOS availability

4. SIRAJ Final Workshop - Rabat 28th May 2012 Procedure design RNAV GNSS Procedure down to LPV minima Today VOR/DME Non-precision Approaches: ProcedureOCA (OCH) (ft) – CAT A VOR/DME RWY17 STD MACG1030 (1010) MACG =4.0%760 (740) VOR RWY172110 (2090) New RNAV LPV Procedure: ProcedureOCA (OCH) (ft) – CAT A LPV STD MACG 680 (660) MACG =4.0% 320 (300) Al-Hoceima Minima reduction of more than 500 ft Vertical guidance during the Final Approach Segment No depedance on ground navigation aids

5. SIRAJ Final Workshop - Rabat 28th May 2012 Flight Validation Campaign Flight Validation campaign in Al-Hoceima

6. SIRAJ Final Workshop - Rabat 28th May 2012 Flight Validation Campaign Flight Validation campaign in Al-Hoceima Perfect Flyability Excellent EGNOS Performance Pilots feedback: The Operation was easier… The Accuracy was better… …than VOR based procedures The cockpit workload was lighther… Pilots feedback: The Operation was easier… The Accuracy was better… …than VOR based procedures The cockpit workload was lighther… 7 approaches: - Standard LPV approach - Obstacle assessment in FAS segment - 2 Horizontal sensibility check - 3 Missed Approach Obstacle assessment

7. SIRAJ Final Workshop - Rabat 28th May 2012 Flight Validation Campaign Flight Validation Equipment –The system (standalone platform) included a Septentrio PolaRX2 GPS/SBAS receiver, whilst the data was also recorded by using ARINC output labels of the GNS480. –In addition, the PILDO in-house flight validation platform has been used for the validation too. PILDO in-house Flight Validation BENEFITS: Reduce Time and Cost To Validate GNSS RNAV Procedures (Including SBAS enhanced procedures) PORTABLE and Adaptive solution to any AIRCRAFT No NEED of 3rd CODING PROVIDERS to codify Procedures PROVIDE High integrity and Quality ASSURANCE THROUGHT all the Validation process Provide Real time Position error estimation Provide In-flight Validation Health Monitoring SAVE-Time on In-Flight Decision Validation of Curved approach Procedure Post-flight Vision And Processing Automatic Report Generation Provide Support and Guidance to the Pilot (CDI/VDI) PILDO in-house Flight Validation BENEFITS: Reduce Time and Cost To Validate GNSS RNAV Procedures (Including SBAS enhanced procedures) PORTABLE and Adaptive solution to any AIRCRAFT No NEED of 3rd CODING PROVIDERS to codify Procedures PROVIDE High integrity and Quality ASSURANCE THROUGHT all the Validation process Provide Real time Position error estimation Provide In-flight Validation Health Monitoring SAVE-Time on In-Flight Decision Validation of Curved approach Procedure Post-flight Vision And Processing Automatic Report Generation Provide Support and Guidance to the Pilot (CDI/VDI)

8. SIRAJ Final Workshop - Rabat 28th May 2012 8 Lessons learned  Optimised approach routing from various arrival directions  Optimum descent profile  Engine-idle descents  Improved track keeping  Use of more flexible route and procedure designs  Limited need for ground infrastructure  Can be implemented in areas where ILS cannot be sited for terrain or obstacle reasons  Can provide approaches to more runways without additional infrastructure costs  Increase the usability of many airports  Reduced fuel burn and noise footprints  Reduced environmental impact  Reduced Radio Traffic (R/T)  Reduced controller and pilot workload  Reduced delays, diversion and cancellations due to bad weather  Reduced costs Aircraft Operators Airports and Air Navigation Service Providers Leading to: APV SBAS Advantages: