Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

14-Nov-11 PAC - Prague Global Design Effort 1 Barry Barish PAC - Prague 14-Nov-11 Global Design Effort Director’s Report Grooved Insert for CesrTA Wiggler.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "14-Nov-11 PAC - Prague Global Design Effort 1 Barry Barish PAC - Prague 14-Nov-11 Global Design Effort Director’s Report Grooved Insert for CesrTA Wiggler."— Presentation transcript:

1 14-Nov-11 PAC - Prague Global Design Effort 1 Barry Barish PAC - Prague 14-Nov-11 Global Design Effort Director’s Report Grooved Insert for CesrTA Wiggler Fermilab NML: RF Unit Test Facility Systems Tests

2 14-Nov-11 PAC - Prague Global Design Effort 2 GDE Status & Plans Update on ILC accelerator R&D The Technical Design Report –Top level changes –Baseline Technical Reviews ; PM level changes –TDR Scope and Plans –Cost Estimate –Project Implementation Planning ILC Systems Tests Post-TDR planning Japan CFS News and Plans

3 SCRF ATF-2 Electron Cloud Update on ILC accelerator R&D 14-Nov-11 PAC - Prague Global Design Effort 3

4 14-Nov-11 PAC - Prague Global Design Effort 4 Major R&D Goals for Technical Design SCRF High Gradient R&D - globally coordinated program to demonstrate gradient by 2010 with 50%yield; improve yield to 90% by TDR (end 2012) Manufacturing: plug compatible design; industrialization, etc. Systems tests: FLASH; plus NML (FNAL), STF2 (KEK) post-TDR Test Facilities ATF2 - Fast Kicker tests and Final Focus design/performance EARTHQUAKE RECOVERY CesrTA - Electron Cloud tests to establish damping ring parameters/design and electron cloud mitigation strategy FLASH – Study performance using ILC-like beam and cryomodule (systems test)

5 14-Nov-11 PAC - Prague Global Design Effort 5 The ILC SCRF Cavity - Achieve high gradient (35MV/m); develop multiple vendors; make cost effective, etc - Focus is on high gradient; production yields; cryogenic losses; radiation; system performance

6 Global Plan for ILC Gradient R&D 14-Nov-11 PAC - Prague Global Design Effort 6 New baseline gradient: Vertical acceptance: 35 MV/m average, allowing ±20% spread (28-42 MV/m) Operational: 31.5 MV/m average, allowing ±20% spread (25-38 MV/m)

7 14-Nov-11 PAC - Prague Global Design Effort 7 Cavity Gradient Milestone Achieved 2010 Milestone TDR Goal Toward TDR goal Field emission; mechanical polishing Other progress

8 14-Nov-11 PAC - Prague Global Design Effort 8 ATF2 – Beam size/stability and kicker tests IPShintake Monitor Final Doublet

9 14-Nov-11 PAC - Prague Global Design Effort 9

10 14-Nov-11 PAC - Prague Global Design Effort 10 Mitigating Electron Cloud Simulations – electrodes; coating and/or grooving vacuum pipe Demonstration at CESR critical tests eCloud R&D

11 14-Nov-11 PAC - Prague Global Design Effort 11 CesrTA - Wiggler Observations IWLC2010 - CERN, Geneva, Switzerland 0.002” radius Electrode  best performance

12 14-Nov-11 PAC - Prague Global Design Effort 12 Field Region Baseline Mitigation Recommendation Alternatives for Further Investigation Drift*TiN CoatingSolenoid WindingsNEG Coating DipoleGrooves with TiN Coating Antechambers for power loads and photoelectron control R&D into the use of clearing electrodes. Quadrup ole* TiN Coating R&D into the use of clearing electrodes or grooves with TiN coating WigglerClearing Electrodes Antechambers for power loads and photoelectron control Grooves with TiN Coating Proposed ILC Mitigation Scheme

13 –Top level changes –Baseline Technical Reviews (lower level changes) –TDR Scope and Plans (Walker) –Cost Estimate (Dugan) –Project Implementation Planning (Paterson) The Technical Design Report 14-Nov-11 PAC - Prague Global Design Effort 13

14 14-Nov-11 PAC - Prague Global Design Effort 14 Establishing Baseline for the TDR

15 14-Nov-11 PAC - Prague Global Design Effort 15 Proposed Design changes for TDR RDRSB2009 Single Tunnel for main linac Move positron source to end of linac *** Reduce number of bunches factor of two (lower power) ** Reduce size of damping rings (3.2km) Integrate central region

16 14-Nov-11 PAC - Prague Global Design Effort 16 Technical Design Phase and Beyond AD&I studies 20092010 RDR ACD concepts R&D Demonstrations TDP Baseline Technical Design 201120122013 RDR Baseline Beijing Workshop TDR TDP-1 TDP-2 Change Request SB2009 evolve change control process AAP PAC Physics CERN Workshop

17 Technical Volumes 15.11.2011 Reference Design Report ILC Technical Progress Report (“interim report”) TDR Part I: R&D TDR Part II: Baseline Reference Report Technical Design Report ~250 pages Deliverable 2 ~300 pages Deliverables 1,3 and 4 * end of 2012 – formal publication early 2013 AD&I Nick Walker - PAC, Prague

18 ILC Project Implementation Planning Contents Executive Summary Governance Funding Models Project Management Host Responsibilities Siting Issues In-Kind Contribution Models Industrialisation and Mass Production of the SCRF Linac Components Project Schedule Future Technical Activities 14-Nov-11 PAC - Prague Global Design Effort 18

19 14-Nov-11 PAC - Prague Global Design Effort 19 Project Implementation Planning

20 14-Nov-11 PAC - Prague Global Design Effort 20 (Global) Mass Production (SCRF) Critically important TDP2 activity Learn from XFEL experience 5% ILC Learn from LHC experience Develop realistic models on which to base cost estimate With industry TLCC-1 Global S1 TDP-2 PIP Governance SCRF

21 14-Nov-11 PAC - Prague Global Design Effort 21

22 14-Nov-11 PAC - Prague Global Design Effort 22 19m x 14m ISO class-5 clean room Chemical Polish room KEK Industrial R&D Pilot Plant Press machine Triming machine Electron Beam Welder work together with industry to develop cost- effective cavity production techniques

23 –TDR –Post - TDR Systems Tests 14-Nov-11 PAC - Prague Global Design Effort 23

24 14-Nov-11 PAC - Prague Global Design Effort 24

25 FLASH: Stability 15 consecutive studies shifts (120hrs), and with no downtime Time to restore 400us bunch- trains after beam-off studies: ~10mins Energy stability with beam loading over periods of hours: ~0.02% Individual cavity “tilts” equally stable Energy stability over 3hrs with 4.5mA ~0.02% pk-pk 9 Feb 2011 14-Nov-11 PAC - Prague Global Design Effort 25

26 Fermilab – NML SRF Schedule 14-Nov-11 PAC - Prague Global Design Effort 26

27 KEK – STF Plans for Cryomodule Tests 14-Nov-11 PAC - Prague Global Design Effort 27

28 –“Value Costs” - Plans and Scope –Comparisons with RDR costs TDR Cost Estimate 14-Nov-11 PAC - Prague Global Design Effort 28

29 TDR Cost estimate: Scope The cost estimate covers only the costs for the 500 GeV design as detailed in the TDR, to be expended during the 8 year construction period. Costs for project engineering and design, R&D prior to construction authorization, commissioning, pre- operation, operation, and de-commissioning are not included. Costs for upgrading the machine to 1 TeV are not included in the baseline estimate, except the cost of those systems which would be very difficult to provide after construction of the 500 GeV machine. An approximate cost for the 1 TeV upgrade will be provided separately. 11/5/2015 ILC PAC 29

30 OECD PPP (Yen/USD)-annual average by year EX-exchange rate GDP: PPP based on all goods/services in GDP of each region M&E: PPP based on machinery and equipment Const: PPP based on civil construction Full PPP determinations were done for 2005 and 2008; other year points based on GDP inflation rates 14-Nov-11 PAC - Prague Global Design Effort 30 PPP = Purchasing Power Parity

31 –Extending the energy of the ILC –Continued R&D – especially SCRF –Organization? (ILCSC) Post TDR 14-Nov-11 PAC - Prague Global Design Effort 31

32 14-Nov-11 PAC - Prague Global Design Effort 32 CY Technical Design Report complete Baseline established 201120122013201420162010 ILC 2015 Technical design & R&D program 20172018 ILC possible timeline SRF system tests TDR reviews Site EOI’s Cost Estimating Decision to proceed Site/host established Project Implementation Plan completeXFEL operation LHC Physics Run 1Physics Run 2Interconnect repair Existence of low- lying SUSY known Higgs energy scale known timegap

33 14-Nov-11 PAC - Prague Global Design Effort 33 CY Technical Design Report complete Baseline established 201120122013201420162010 ILC 2015 Technical design & R&D program 20172018 ILC possible timeline SRF system tests TDR reviews Site EOI’s Cost Estimating Decision to proceed Site/host established Project Implementation Plan completeXFEL operation LHC Physics Run 1Physics Run 2Interconnect repair Existence of low- lying SUSY known Higgs energy scale known timegap

34 14-Nov-11 PAC - Prague Global Design Effort 34 Post – TDR (ILCSC)

35 ICFA LC Parameters subcommittee (2003 and 2006) 14-Nov-11 PAC - Prague Global Design Effort 35 Extending the reach of the ILC

36 Upgrade option for study: - Power < 300MW AC - New linac grad = 45 MV/m - Q 0 = 2 10 10 Strawman TeV parameters Post-TDR program: Improve cavity gradient Cost effective production Flexibilty: Initial ILC energy: higher or lower energy, as informed by LHC results 14-Nov-11 PAC - Prague Global Design Effort 36

37 14-Nov-11 PAC - Prague Global Design Effort 37 Post-TDR ILC Interim Goals & Organization GDE will have successfully completed its mandate after TDR & PIP delivered + reviewed (mid-2013 at latest + transition) What should follow GDE (mandate and organization) for an interim 3-5 year period? (ILCSC – Bagger) GDE position paper submitted to ILCSC Aug 2011. The paper addresses: –Technical Goals proposed for 2012+ program? Value engineering; Continued system demonstrations; Increasing energy reach; + – Organizational Issues for 2012+ post GDE? What are primary GDE assets that should be preserved? What are the primary GDE weaknesses that should be improved? We must define what systems tests must demonstrate for each LC option before construction of a LC? ICFA??

38 Two Candidate Sites in Asia/Japan -GDE-CFS group visited two sites, Oct., 2011

39 Common Features ILC-GDE PMs, 11-11-11 ILC Cavity Industrialization 39 Courtesy: M. Miyahara

40 Studies for 8 Cases of Tunnel Design

41 ‘Bread Shape’ under Study Cost-and time-effective in Japan

42 CFS Study: Progress in Japan JFYProgress 2009 AAA volunteered to study ‘ILC tunnel design’ for SB2009, 2010 Local communities (LCs) organized geological survey by themselves. KEK studied 8 cases of the tunnel design, and reached a ‘Bread-shape (Kamaboko) shape tunnel’ to be an economical candidate, specifically, in Japanese mountainous regions. 2011 AAA re-volunteered to evaluate the tunnel design and environmental conditions, to assist KEK. LCs reported the geological survey to KEK. KEK going to progress the engineering work of tunneling, electrical, and mechanical issues, based on the information given by AAA and LCs, Japanese Civil Engineer Association is active to professionally assess the geological surveys and civil engineering. S&T Policy Council of the Cabinet received a brief report from MEXT on Sept. 1, on science objectives of the ILC project and global status. A Supplemental Budget being discussed at the Diet to encourage/boost recovery of national and regional activities. It may include some support for further site-dependent geological studies at the candidate sites in cooperation of KEK with the local communities (universities, and local Gov.)

43 14-Nov-11 PAC - Prague Global Design Effort 43 Conclusions The major R&D milestones for TDR are essentially in-hand The Technical Design Report will be a self-contained comprehensive R&D report; with a design based on new baseline; a new value costing; and a section on project implementation planning We seek your advice / concurrence on our system tests goals and program Post–TDR program is being planned: extend energy reach; complete systems tests; evolve design based on technology development and LHC results


Download ppt "14-Nov-11 PAC - Prague Global Design Effort 1 Barry Barish PAC - Prague 14-Nov-11 Global Design Effort Director’s Report Grooved Insert for CesrTA Wiggler."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google