Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Environmental Protection and Conservation Cluster 2010-2013 PPAs ASSESSMENT.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Environmental Protection and Conservation Cluster 2010-2013 PPAs ASSESSMENT."— Presentation transcript:

1 Environmental Protection and Conservation Cluster 2010-2013 PPAs ASSESSMENT

2 Environmental Protection and Conservation 2010-2013 PPAs ASSESSMENT Dole out mentality Reluctant partners to support the program (DENR, BLGU) Reluctant MLGUs & BLGUs to actively participate in the implementation Un-empowered MENROs 1. What lessons can be drawn in the course of implementation of the programs/projects in your sector?

3 Environmental Protection and Conservation 2010-2013 PPAs ASSESSMENT Change of administration, Change of direction Lack of education on family’s role Lack of monitoring in far-flung Barangays Difficulty in obtaining DENR Affirmation 1. What lessons can be drawn in the course of implementation of the programs/projects in your sector?

4 Environmental Protection and Conservation 2010-2013 PPAs ASSESSMENT Sincerity of the NGA and other implementing agencies? Gain respect from the investors 1. What lessons can be drawn in the course of implementation of the programs/projects in your sector?

5 Environmental Protection and Conservation 2010-2013 PPAs ASSESSMENT Lacks of cooperation and awareness among departments Not invoking partnership between 1 department to another Laxity of the enforcement of the environmental laws PPAs are not community need-based Lacks advocacy; developed negative mind-set of beneficiaries due to unsustained projects 1. What lessons can be drawn in the course of implementation of the programs/projects in your sector?

6 Environmental Protection and Conservation 2010-2013 PPAs ASSESSMENT Empowerment of local communities Increase income on cash crops Reduction of health related issues/ pollution contamination Reduce illegal activities & encroachment Minimize resource exploitation 2. What are the impacts that have been observed, and how the local programs and projects contributed to such impacts?

7 Environmental Protection and Conservation 2010-2013 PPAs ASSESSMENT Yes, programs like AEGP greening Project and SAGIP-upland (upland development) Dole out programs (No sense of ownership) Yes, SAVE AGUSAN, Enforcement of Environmental laws NGOs were discouraged to support due to the absence of “IRR” 3. Were there any programs and projects that yielded an adverse impact? What are these programs and projects?

8 Environmental Protection and Conservation 2010-2013 PPAs ASSESSMENT The following PPAs are to be sustained: AEGP Greening Project Rehabilitation of Watersheds Sagip-upland (upland development) Responsible mining-economic mining zone 4. What are the programs and projects which are worthy of replication and thus have to be sustained?

9 Environmental Protection and Conservation 2010-2013 PPAs ASSESSMENT The following PPAs are to be sustained: Solid waste Management Program Co-management Program on Protection & Conservation of Agusan Marsh Enforcement of Environmental Laws Sustainable Development & Environmental Management (ASESDC) 4. What are the programs and projects which are worthy of replication and thus have to be sustained?

10 Environmental Protection and Conservation 2010-2013 PPAs ASSESSMENT AEGP USAD Responsible mining 5. What programs and projects exhibited high potential in reducing poverty?

11 Environmental Protection and Conservation 2010-2013 PPAs ASSESSMENT Co-management approach program SAVE Agusan-Multi Stakeholder participation/engagement, collaboration and partnership between the LGUs and the NGOs 6. What are the good practices that have been demonstrated in the course of program/project management?

12 Environmental Protection and Conservation 2010-2013 PPAs ASSESSMENT To be enhanced: Procurement processes Counter parting scheme MOA formulation Strengthening of M & E Social Marketing 7. What are the processes and activities that have to be discontinued or enhanced since they have caused delays and ineffectiveness in program/project implementation?

13 Environmental Protection and Conservation 2010-2013 PPAs ASSESSMENT To discontinue: DOLE-OUT PPAs 7. What are the processes and activities that have to be discontinued or enhanced since they have caused delays and ineffectiveness in program/project implementation?

14 Environmental Protection and Conservation 2010-2013 PPAs ASSESSMENT Declaration of watersheds has strong community engagement 8. What are the programs and projects that have demonstrated strong and genuine community engagement?

15 Environmental Protection and Conservation 2010-2013 PPAs ASSESSMENT Cluster Balanced Scorecard is not yet finalized 9. How effective is the Balanced Scorecard in project implementation?

16 Environmental Protection and Conservation 2010-2013 PPAs ASSESSMENT Multi-sectoral partnershipCo-Management Counter parting scheme between enrollees and implementor. 10. What are the strategies to be further promoted? What are the strategies to be altered since they have not been proven to be effective?


Download ppt "Environmental Protection and Conservation Cluster 2010-2013 PPAs ASSESSMENT."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google