Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Maintenance Policies Corrective maintenance: It is usually referred to as repair. Its purpose is to bring the component back to functioning state as soon.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Maintenance Policies Corrective maintenance: It is usually referred to as repair. Its purpose is to bring the component back to functioning state as soon."— Presentation transcript:

1 Maintenance Policies Corrective maintenance: It is usually referred to as repair. Its purpose is to bring the component back to functioning state as soon as possible. In some cases, it involves replacement of one or more components. Preventive maintenance: Its purpose is to reduce the probability of component failure. It may involve lubrication, small adjustment, or replacing components or parts of components that are beginning to wear out. Periodic testing and maintenance based on condition monitoring are also regarded as preventive maintenance.

2 Maintainability The ability of an item, under stated conditions of use, to be retained in, or restored to, a state in which it can perform its required functions, when maintenance is performed under stated conditions and using prescribed procedures and resources (BS 4778).

3 Availability The ability of an item (under combined aspects of its reliability, maintainability, and maintenance support) to perform its required function at a stated instant of time or over a stated period of time (BS 4778). When considering a production system, the average availability of the production is sometimes called the production regularity.

4 Corrective Maintenance Replacement/repair after failure

5 Transition of Component States N F Component fails Component is repaired Failed state continues Normal state continues

6 The Failure-to-Repair Process

7 Repair Probability - G(t) The probability that repair is completed before time t, given that the component failed at time zero. If the component is non-repairable

8 Repair Density - g(t)

9 Repair Rate - m(t) The probability that the component is repaired per unit time at time t, given that the component failed at time zero and has been failed to time t. If the component is non-repairable

10 Mean Time to Repair - MTTR

11 The Whole Process

12

13 Availability - A(t) The probability that the component is normal at time t, i.e., A(t)=Pr{X(t)=1}. For non-repairable components For repairable components

14 Unavailability - Q(t) The probability that the component fails at time t, i.e., For non-repairable components For repairable components

15 Unconditional Failure Density, w(t) The probability that a component fails per unit time at time t, given that it jumped into the normal state at time zero. Note, for non-repairable components.

16 Unconditional Repair Density, v(t) The probability that the component is repaired per unit time at time t, give that it jumped into the normal state at time zero.

17 Conditional Failure Intensity λ(t) The probability that the component fails per unit time, given that it is in the normal state at time zero and normal at time t. In general, λ(t)≠r(t). For non-repairable components, λ(t) = r(t). However, if the failure rate is constant (λ), then λ(t) = r(t) = λ for both repairable and non- repairable components.

18 Conditional Repair Intensity, µ(t) The probability that a component is repaired per unit time at time t, given that it is jumped into the normal state at time zero and is failed at time t, For non-repairable component, µ(t)=m(t)=0. For a constant repair rate m, µ(t)=m.

19 The Average Availability The average availability in a time interval is defined as This definition can be interpreted as the average proportion of interval where the component is able to function.

20 The Limiting Availability It can be shown that In the reliability literature, the symbol A is often used as notation both for the limiting availability and the average availability.

21 Expected Number of Failures (ENF)

22 ENF over an interval, W(t 1,t 2 ) Expected number of failures during (t1,t2) given that the component jumped into the normal state at time zero. For non-repairable components

23 ENR over an interval, Expected number of repairs during, given that the component jumped into the normal state at time zero. For non-repairable components

24 Mean Time Between Repairs, MTBR Expected length of time between two consecutive repairs. MTBR = MTTF + MTTR Mean Time Between Fails, MTBF Expected length of time between two consecutive failures. MTBF = MTBR

25 Let where

26 Failure Rate r(t) General r(t) Const. r(t)= RELATIONS AMONG PROBABILISTIC PARAMETERS FOR REPAIR-TO-FAILURE PROCESS (THE FIRST FAILURE) ●

27 Repair Rate m(t) General m(t) Const. m(t)=u RELATIONS AMONG PROBABILISTIC PARAMETERS FOR FAILURE-TO-REPAIR PROCESS ●

28 RepairableNon-repairable Fundamental Relations RELATIONS AMONG PROBABILISTIC PARAMETERS FOR THE WHOLE PROCESS ( Next ) ※ ※ ※ ◎

29 Stationary Values Remark

30 CALCULATION OF w(t) and v(t) (given f (t) and g (t)) Two types of components fail during [t, t+dt] : Type I Type II FNFNFNFN uu+dutt+dt time Probability of Type I : ( v (u) du ) ( f (t-u) dt ) Probability of Type II : f (t) dt OR

31 One type of components which is repaired during [t, t+dt] FNFN u u+dut t+dt time OR

32

33 [ EXAMPLE ]

34 01234567890123456789 18 15 5 4 2 1 0 0.1667 0.7222 0.7778 0.8889 0.9444 1 0.8333 0.2778 0.2222 0.1111 0.0556 0 3 10 1 2 1 0 1 0 0.1667 0.5556 0.0556 0.1111 0.0556 0 0.0556 0 0.1667 0.6667 0.2001 0.5000 0.5005 0 1.0000 -

35 TTF data Exponential Weibull Normal Log-normal Histogram f (t) MTTF assumption parameter identification polynomial approximation r (t) F (t) R (t)

36 TTR data Exponential Weibull Normal Log-normal Histogram g (t) G (t) m (t) MTTR assumption Polynomial approximation parameter identification

37 f (t), g (t) or w(0) = f(0), v(0) = 0 w (t), v (t) Q (t) A (t) = 1 - Q (t) A (t)

38 Constant-Rate Models Repair-to-Failure

39 NON-REPAIRABLE Good Failed 1 P (t) = probability that the component is good at time t = R(t) good at t and remained good failed at t and was repaired Initial Condition :

40 Constant-Rate Models Failure-to-Repair

41 Constant-Rate Models Dynamic Behavior of Whole Process (1) also

42 GoodFailed REPAIRABLE good and remained good failed and repaired μΔt λΔt 1-λΔt 1-μΔt

43 Initial Condition: P(0)=1

44 Constant-Rate Models Dynamic Behavior of Whole Process (2)

45 Constant-Rate Models Stationary Values of the Whole Process

46 Proof (1) From Laplace Transform

47 Proof (2) Rearrangement and Inversion

48 System Availability

49 Approximate Average (Limiting) System Unavailability

50 Preventive Maintenance Periodic Testing and/or Replacement

51 The Hidden Failures The protective devices, i.e. alarms, SVs, interlocks and trips, are passive components. There are two failure modes: “fail to function” (FTF) and “false alarm” (FA). The most important failure mode is (FTF) and is always a hidden failure. The maintenance policy of periodic testing, and repair or replacement is often needed to improve the reliability of components with hidden failures. After a test (repair), the component is considered to be “as good as new.”

52

53 The Component Up-Time Let T be the time to FTF failure of a component, with distribution function and probability density Consider the first test interval (0, ]. Let be the part of this time interval where the component is able to function and be the part where the component fails.

54 The Distribution of Up-Time It should be noted that these function are periodical. In other words, they are the same in the intervals

55

56

57 The Average Availability Consider the first test Interval (0, ], it can be shown that Since all test intervals have the same stochastic characteristics,

58 The Mean Fractional Dead Time (MFDT) The average unavailability is often called the mean fractional dead time, i.e.

59 Special Case – Constant Failure Rate Mean Up-Time

60 Special Case – Constant Failure Rate Average availability Mean fractional dead time

61 Special Case – Constant Failure Rate Expansion Approximation

62 Example

63 System Unavailability Consider a system of n independent components with constant failure rates, Failures in a test interval are neither detected nor repaired. Hence the component may be regarded as nonrepairable within the test interval.

64 System Unavailability The cut set unavailability The system unavailability where denotes the order of the minimal cut set and j = 1, 2, …, k.

65 The System MFDT

66 The k-out-of-n System Assume that there are n identical and independent system with constant failure rate. The system has C(n, n-k+1) cut sets of order (n-k+1).

67 MFDT of k-out-of-n Systems k \ n 1234 1 2--- 3 --- --- 4

68 Mean Time to Failure Let denote the time from the component is put into operation until its first failure where, Z is the number of test intervals until the component fails for the first time; is the down time in interval (0,τ).

69 The mean number of test intervals until the component fails – E[Z]

70 The Mean Down Time 0 =F(τ)

71 Mean Time to Failure Special Case: constant failure rate

72 The Critical Situation A critical situation occurs if a hazardous event occurs while the protective system is in a failed state. The hazard rate is constant β. A critical situation occurs in (0,τ] if 1. The protective system fails in (t,t+dt] where t<τ and, simultaneously 2. At least one hazardous event occurs in (t,τ].

73 The Probability of Critical Event The probability of at least one critical event in the interval (0,τ] is Since and MFDT


Download ppt "Maintenance Policies Corrective maintenance: It is usually referred to as repair. Its purpose is to bring the component back to functioning state as soon."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google