2. When you look at NCLB data, WHAT are you looking at????? JES: Grade 4 and Grade 5 JMHS: Grades 7,8,10, 11 So what is assessed with KCCT at these grade levels? KCCT Data JES: Grade 4 Reading Grade 5 Math JMHS: Grade 7 Reading Grade 8 Math Grade 10 Reading Grade 11 Math

3. This impacts our district because it increases the number of students we tested. This increases the confidence Interval (makes the range smaller). How is this year’s Data Different?

4. Wellstone Amendment Consequences are only for schools/districts that receive Title I Funding

5. Why is this information so significant? JES AMO Counts JMHS AMO Counts JES: Grade 4 Reading Grade 5 Math JMHS: Grade 7 Reading Grade 8 Math Grade 10 Reading Grade 11 Math The data reflects both test data from 2005 AND 2006.

7. Targets vary due to the student population. Count the YES boxes to determine the # targets.

8. JIS Targets increase at increments to move our students to proficiency by 2014.. Last year there is a 3 year period before standard is raised annually. Increases at increments to move all students to proficiency by 2014.

9. JIS Reading Goal 45.21 Target populations

10. JIS Math 29.62 30.29 0.67

11. Interventions CDIP: Revisions will be made to the CDIP Tentative activities: Provide PD for staff in the area of incorporating math into the content areas PACE maps will be developed to ensure the Core Content for Assessment and Program of Studies are being taught Continue Depth of Knowledge training Continue Authentic Assessments Continue Real world application of mathematics

14. JES

15. JES Reading 53.86

16. JES Math 32.14

18. Basically the same group Counted three ways…

19. JMHS NO Consequences---- Yearly goals

20. JMHS Reading 40.88

21. JMHS Math 28.36

22. Interventions CSIP: Revisions will be made to the CSIP Tentative activities: Provide PD for staff in the area of incorporating math into the content areas PACE maps will be developed to ensure the Core Content for Assessment and Program of Studies are being taught Continue Depth of Knowledge training Continue Authentic Assessments Continue Real world application of mathematics Mentors for new teachers Purchase Software that can be used during ESS and during classroom instruction

23. Neither school nor the district is in consequences. If JMHS did not use Title I funds, they could not have any consequences even if they missed AYP every year. To have consequences, the school would have to miss AYP for two consecutive years.

24. Comparison tp local schools JENKINSYes FloydNo HazardYes KnottNo LetcherNo PerryNo PikeYes PikevilleNo

25. Comparison tp local Middle Schools M/H Middle School Readin gMathTier JENKINSYesNo1st year Allen CentralYes BelfryNo Not Title I PikevilleYes Prestonsburg (Adams)NoYesIst year South FloydNoYes1st year VirgieYes WhitesburgYes

26. Comparison tp local High Schools MH/H School Readin gMathTier Allen CentralYes 2 BelfryNoYesNot Title I BellNo Not Title I Betsy LayneNoYesI BreathittNo 3 ClayNo Not Title I CordiaWavier East RidgeNo Not Title I HazardYes Knott Co.No 2 Letcher Co. CentralNo Reconfigured PhelpsYes Not Title I Pike CentralYes Not Title I PikevilleYes Not Title I PrestonsburgNo 3 Shelby ValleyYes Not Title I South FloydYesNo3

27. AYP is one measure of accountability. It reflects reading and math at specific grades only. CATS data will be available is September and will give us a broader picture of Student achievement in multiple areas.