1. 1 FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPALS OF In Situ THERMAL TREATMENT Professor Kent S. Udell Department of Mechanical Engineering Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of California at Berkeley

2. 2 Outline 4 General Description of Subsurface Contamination by NAPLs 4 Description of Thermal Treatment 4 Thermodynamics of NAPL/Water “Boiling” 4 Thermodynamics of Steam Stripping via In Situ Steam Generation 4 General Observations and Comments

3. 3 General Contamination Schematic

4. 4 General SEE Schematic Pumped Vapors and Liquids STEAM or HEAT

5. 5 Apparatus to Observe “Boiling”

6. 6 Boiling Occurs in Region II 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 020406080100120140 Temperature [ o C] Time [minutes] Temperature Plateau PCE Sand Pack Water Bath Region I Region II Region III

7. 7  T Correlates with PCE Extraction Rate During Boiling. Heat Transfer Limited! 0 2 4 6 8 10 0 2 4 6 8 020406080100120140 Temperature Difference [ o C] Time [minutes] PCE Extraction Rate [mL/min.] Temperature Difference PCE Extraction Rate Region I Region II Region III

8. 8 Effluent Vapor Composition

9. 9 General Conclusions Regarding Heating to the Water Boiling Point 4 Thermodynamic forces drive the evaporation of all NAPL if the soil/water/NAPL system is heated to boiling point of water. 4 “Boiling” rate is controlled by heat transfer, not mass transfer. 4 Heat transfer occurs about 10,000 times faster than aqueous diffusion in porous media and rocks. Thus, NAPL vaporization and removal from hydraulically inaccessible zones is rapid during thermal remediation compared to fluid delivery technologies.

10. 10 However 4 Compounds vaporized in heated zones may condense on heated zone boundaries. Vapors must be collected promptly and effectively to avoid the spread of contamination. Air co-injection helps to keep VOC in vapor phase, thus facilitating capture. 4 Remaining NAPL concentrations in water are near saturation limit - still orders of magnitude above drinking water standards.

11. 11 VOC Removal By H 2 O Vaporization (In Situ Steam Stripping)  The fraction of species i remaining (C i,w /C i,wo ) is equal to the fraction of water remaining (m w /m wo ) to the power of the mass fraction ratio (  =C i,v /C iw =H  l /  v ) minus 1. Where H is the dimensionless Henry’s Law Constant.

12. 12 Values for the mass fraction ratio  for various chemicals at 20˚C. For Reference:

13. 13 Fraction i remaining vs. % water removed

14. 14 General Observation Regarding Steam Stripping via In Situ Steam Generation 4 Theoretically capable of lowering aqueous phase concentrations to US drinking water standards. 4 Laboratory (EPA and UCB) and field (LLNL Gas Pad and Alameda Point) data to support effectiveness. 4 Intra-particle mass transfer rates, diffusion limitations in high water content media, or restrictions on vapor flow from zones of low permeabilities may limit effectiveness.

15. 15 How can we promote in situ steam stripping? 4 Depressurization during SEE –Turning off steam while turning up vacuum decreases pressure, and thus temperature, in the steam zone. Decrease in soil and water temperature releases energy to drive water vaporization. 4 Electrical Heating –Once temperature has reached the water boiling point, additional heat generation goes to boiling water, producing in situ steam stripping.

16. 16 Concluding Observations 4 Steam Enhanced Remediation can easily exploit robust vaporization mechanisms, allowing effective in situ application. 4 Risk of contaminant spreading with all thermal techniques is considerable but manageable with care. 4 While implementation is direct, relatively inexpensive, and reasonably predictable, effective and safe implementation require substantial expertise.