2. Peer reviewer Basic Workshop Prof. Dr. Gamalat M. Ali Director of Tanta Quality Assurance Center, Tanta University

3. Internal System for Quality Management A system that involves performance follow- up, precise identification of learning deficiencies and obstacles, suggestions for development and enhancement, policies, modification and needs-oriented priorities re- ordering and following-up the identification and implementation of development policies.

4. Internal System for Quality Management A system that involves: 1-Performance follow-up, 2-precise identification of learning deficiencies and obstacles ( التشخيص ), 3-suggestions for development and enhancement, policies ( العلاج ), 4-modification and needs-oriented priorities re-ordering التعديل و اعادة ترتيب مقترحات و متطلبات سياسة التحسين بناء على تحديد الأولويات المبنى على تحديد الاحتياجات 5-following-up the identification and implementation of development policies.

5. Transitional phase to accreditation Enhancement agenda Builds upon the annual self-studies and the development projects Evaluation of the effectiveness of Quality Assurance system and processes Evaluation of the robustness of evidence base (internal reporting)

6. The evidence base starts with the products of internal reviews Annual faculty report (+) Strategic review report (self-study) Supporting documentation Planning of developmental engagement By NQAAC By review chair By institution and facilitator By peer reviewers

7. Initial analysis by peer reviewers Preparatory meeting by review chair Engagements (site visit) verify and/or Generate additional evidence Conclusions, feedback and report-writing

8. Preliminary Action by NQAAA In sequence 1- Identification of subject sectors to be reviewed within a given time slot and institutions to be reviewed. 2- Notification to Institution of intention to Review 3- Institution informs NQAAA of subject specialism within the provision

9. 4- Selection of peer reviewers and acceptance by ' institution 5- Institution sends agreed documentation to NQAAA 6-8 weeks prior to first day of review. 6- QAAA makes documentation available to Chairman Preliminary Action by NQAAA

10. Preparation of documentation for review, including: * Initial submission to NQAAA * Documentation (B) to be sent to review team in advance of the review * Documentation to be made available to review team during review * Preparation of academic staff to respond to review * Allocation of responsibility for aspects of the review Preliminary Action by Institution

11. Academic Standards  Intended learning outcomes  Curriculum  Student assessment  Student achievement Quality of Learning opportunities  Teaching and learning  Student support  Learning resources Research and other scholarly activity Community Involvement Effectiveness of Quality Management and Enhancement  Governance and leadership  Quality assurance system  Self-evaluation, plans and impact

12. What are the materials to be reviewed?

13. Documentation to be sent in advance 1- Faculty Annual Report. 2- Programme (S) specifications. 3- Courses’ Specifications. 4- The latest course reports. 5- The latest programme (S) reports. Evaluation Initial commentary

14. Documentation to be Reviewed in the Site Visit Programme approval (validation) documents Programme handbooks Student handbooks Learner support materials (a sample may be sufficient) Evaluation Evidence Based

15. Documentation to be Reviewed in the Site Visit External evaluators' reports for the last three years if applicable Student feedback summaries Outcomes of consultations, surveys and other engagements with students Recruitment and progression data including employment Evaluation Evidence Based

16. Documentation to be Reviewed in the Site Visit Records of staff-student liaison committee or the equivalent for the last year Assessment criteria together with guidance and rules of marking or equivalent Samples of students' assessed work representing all (الكنترول) levels and a sample of programmes for at (محاضر لجان الممتحنين) Examination board minutes least three years Evaluation Evidence Based

17. Documentation to be Reviewed in the Site Visit Staff CVs including summary lists of research, conference papers and publications Examples of the output from recent community service activity Staff development programme and reports Professional, statutory and regulatory body reports if relevant Evaluation Evidence Based

18. What is the importance of these documents ?

19. The Evaluative Framework & Criteria 1- The Academic Standards. 2- Quality of Learning Opportunities. 3- Research and other Scholarly Activity. 4- Community Involvement 5-The Effectiveness of Quality Management and Enhancement.

20. Thank you