Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

WP6 Evaluation EuroHealthNet Cristina Chiotan Public Health Coordinator.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "WP6 Evaluation EuroHealthNet Cristina Chiotan Public Health Coordinator."— Presentation transcript:

1 WP6 Evaluation EuroHealthNet Cristina Chiotan Public Health Coordinator

2 AUSTRIA: Austrian Health Promotion Foundation BELGIUM: Flemish Institute for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention BULGARIA: National Centre of Public Health Protection CROATIA:National Institute of Public Health CZECH REPUBLIC: National Institute of Public Health DENMARK: National Board of Health UK: Department of Health Kent & Medway NHS North West Health Office ESTONIA: National Institute for Health Development FRANCE: National Institute for Prevention and Health Education (INPES) FINLAND: Finnish Centre for Health Promotion GERMANY: Federal Centre for Health Education (BZgA) GREECE: Institute of Preventive Medicine, Environmental & Occupational Health Prolepsis FINLAND:National Institute for Health and Welfare Finnish Society for Social and Health - SOSTE HUNGARY: Hungarian National Institute for Health Development (OEFI) University of Debrecen ITALY: Veneto Region LATVIA: The Centre of Health Economics NETHERLANDS: NIGZ: Netherlands Institute for Health Promotion RIVM: Netherlands Institute Public Health and the Environment 41 members and partners in 27 European countries NORWAY: Norwegian Directorate of Health POLAND: National Institute of Hygiene – Public Health Research Institute ROMANIA: Institute of Public Health Iasi SCOTLAND: NHS Health Scotland SLOVAKIA: Public Health Authority of the Slovak Republic SLOVENIA: National Institute of Public Health Institute of Public Health Murska Sobota SPAIN: Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo Universidad de La Laguna SWEDEN: Stockholm County Council SWITZERLAND: Health Promotion Switzerland WALES: Public Health Wales IRELANDInstitute of Public Health MONTENEGROInstitute of Public Health ROMANIANational Institute of Public Health SWEDENSwedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions

3 - Reducing Health Inequalities - Combat NCDs - Health Promotion for sustainable health systems Policy development Project participation Networking Communication

4 Health Inequalities are persistent and increasing

5 EuroHealthNet EuroHealthNet The European Partnership for Improving Healthy Equity and Wellbeing PHASE The European Platform for Action on Health & Social Equity HPE Health Promotion Europe The European Network for Health Promotion CIRI The European Centre for Innovation, Research & Implementation in Health & Wellbeing The EuroHealthNet Secretariat, Executive and General Councils

6 Evaluation WHY? To support Consortium performance; To collectively identify and respond to problems; To maximise impact and ensure sustainability. HOW? Through project’s products, interviews and questionnaires WHO? All project partners

7 AHA.SI Evaluation Draft Evaluation Framework based on project’s work-plan, timeframe, deliverables including process, output and outcome indicators to be commented by WP leads and agreed by all  Guiding Principles for Active Ageing and Solidarity between Generations;  The Active Ageing Index;  Social Investment Package.

8 AHA.SI Evaluation  Review processes: meetings, event reports; questionnaires and interviews;  Analyse outputs: schedule and content (3 external experts);  Assess outcomes: stakeholders views on impact 3 interim reports and one final report

9 Logic model: Inputs Management structure Internal/ External expertise Time Funds ActivitiesOutputs Short- term outcomes Long-term outcomes More seniors employed More active and healthy seniors More LTC Higher public awareness Feasibility of Strategy Cooperation health and social sectors policy.. Networking Awareness campaign Strategy (3 position papers) Networking Conferences Review of best practices Situation analysis

10 Examples Specific objective: Network of different sectors at different levels Process indicators: no. of meetings organised, reports, etc.; Output indicators: satisfaction and impact; follow up colaborations (questionnaires, interviews) Outcome indicators: the network allows better strategy implementation (interviews)

11 Examples Specific objective: Greater public and target groups awareness Process indicators: campaign, communication (WP5 products) Output indicators: no. of people reached, materials produced, no. of events dissemination etc. Outcome indicators: public awareness evaluation study

12 Short-term outcomes:public awareness ComponentsIndicatorsMethod contextAspects that may have an influence on the campaign Reach% of population (subgroups?) having heard of the campaign Dose deliveredNumber and type of messages delivered Dose received% of population (subgroups?) aware of … Or agree with the new strategy? fidelityDegree to which the messages reflected well the strategy

13 Example: networking ComponentsIndicatorsMethod intentionKnowing counterpart Trust Q Interview *** activitiesExchange of newsletters Cabinet committees Joined budgeting Delegated financing Health conferences (collaborative governance) Industry engagement

14 Thank you! Cristina Chiotan c.chiotan@eurohealthnet.eu Ingrid Stegeman i.stegeman@eurohealthnet.eu Cristina Chiotan Public Health Coordinator


Download ppt "WP6 Evaluation EuroHealthNet Cristina Chiotan Public Health Coordinator."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google