1. Creating Uniform Standards for Research and Development Evaluation Panel: Cooperative Efforts in International Science and Technology Evaluation American Evaluation Association/ Canadian Evaluation Association joint meeting October 28, 2005 Cheryl J. Oros Director, Planning and Accountability Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service

2. Evaluation Goals – Aid Decision Makers Evaluation is applied research in service to decision makers Provide performance and evaluation results which will enable managers and decision makers to implement, manage, refine, and show the impact of the highest quality programs. Meet external accountability requirements

3. Planning/Decision Making Identify needs, problems, solutions, refinements Conceptualization of Program Formulation of Evaluation Questions and Design Implementation Actualize the Program Plan Collection of Evaluation Data Analysis of Data Evaluation Feedback Feedback of Evaluation Findings to Managers Refinement of Program Continued Funding Evaluation/Management Cycle

4. Standardization Recommendations Use of Strategic Planning, with alignment of research portfolios, programs, and projects Use of OMB/ NAS Research and Development Criteria Use of logic models to develop relevant evaluation questions, indicators, and approaches

5. Typical designs used to assess program effectiveness Design features that help control for alternative explanations Best suited for (typical examples) Process and outcome monitoring or evaluation Compares performance to pre-existing goal or standard. For example:  OMB R&D criteria of relevance, quality and performance.  Productivity, cost effectiveness and efficiency standards Research, enforcement, information and statistical programs, and business-like enterprises with  few, if any, alternative explanations for observed outcomes.  ongoing programs producing goods and services  complete national coverage Quasi-experiments – Single Group Compare outcomes for program participants or entities before and after the intervention.  Multiple data points over time are necessary.  Control for alternative explanations by statistical adjustments and analyses such as modeling. Regulatory and other programs with  clearly defined interventions with distinct starting times  complete national coverage  random assignment of participants or entities to groups is NOT feasible, practical, or ethical. Quasi-experiments- Comparison Groups Compares outcomes for program participants or entities with outcomes for a comparison group selected to closely match the “treatment” group on key characteristics.  Key characteristics are plausible alternative explanations for the outcome.  Measure outcomes before and after intervention (pretest, posttest). Service and other programs with  clearly defined interventions that can be standardized and controlled  limited national coverage  random assignment of participants or entities to groups is NOT feasible, practical, or ethical. Randomized experiments Compares outcomes for randomly assigned program (treatment) participants or entities with outcomes for a randomly assigned “control” group prior to intervention.  Measure outcomes before and after intervention (pretest, posttest). Service and other programs with  clearly defined interventions that can be standardized and controlled  limited national coverage  random assignment of participants or entities to groups is feasible and ethical. Table 2: Common Evaluation Approaches For Assessing Program Effectiveness

6. New U.S. federal encouragements to standardize evaluation approaches PART BPI Budget Justifications

7. OMB PART OMB’s Program Assessment Rating Tool Program Purpose & Design Strategic Planning Program Management Program Results

8. Federal Budget & Performance Integration Budget submissions need alignment with goals & objectives, with funds distributed accordingly, along with quantifiable performance measures

9. Explanatory Notes/ Budget Justifications Introduction: national problem, why important & how CSREES plans to solve problem How CSREES plans to spend funds What would happen if funding not received

10. Budget justifications (cont.) Draw on past accomplishments Identify performance measurements and evaluation plans Acknowledge and deal with environmental complexities

11. Example of fully aligned Strategic Goals: 1. Enhance economic opportunities for agricultural producers 2. Support increased economic opportunities and improved quality of life in rural America 3. Enhance protection and safety of the nation’s agriculture and food supply 4. Improve the nation’s nutrition and health 5. Protect and enhance the nation’s natural resource base and environment

12. Cascading Alignment. Goal Strategic Objective Portfolio Topic areas Programs/projects Mission

13. Alignment Example Goal 3: Enhance Protection & Safety of Food Supply Strategic Objective 3.2 b: Animal Protection Animal Protection Portfolio Knowledge Areas (KA 311) Improve the management of animal diseases (KA 312) Increase knowledge & improve management of pests & external parasites (KA 313) Increase knowledge to control internal parasites (KA 314) Reduce losses in livestock, poultry, and fish (KA 315) Develop and implement effective animal care

14. Evaluating Research & Education Efforts: Portfolio Approach OMB PART/BPI led to development of new portfolio assessment tool and measures Portfolio analysis (meta-analysis) used to assess progress toward goals; guide future research plans Uses OMB (NAS) R&D criteria (relevance, quality, performance)

15. “Portfolio” concept Allows numerous complex interrelated programs, funding lines, and research projects to be described as they address strategic objectives and goals

16. Portfolio Review Expert Panel (PREP) Process Focus on outcomes rather than processes Level of analysis is a portfolio identified via research topic areas in databases Scores portfolio progress & provides recommendations for Agency

17. Evidentiary materials Tracks papers, citations, patents, products, educational efforts, adoption of products/ practices Entire evaluation studies and special analyses Budget tables to show portfolio priorities and emphases

18. 5 Dimensions of Relevance Scope Focus on critical needs Identification of emerging issues Integration of CSREES programs Interdisciplinary integration

19. 4 Dimensions of Quality Significance of findings & outputs Stakeholder assessment Alignment of portfolio with current science Methodological rigor

20. 5 Dimensions of Performance Portfolio productivity Portfolio completeness Portfolio timeliness Agency guidance relevant to portfolio Portfolio accountability

21. Inputs Outputs Activities- What we do Outcomes-Impact Short term Medium Term Long Term AssumptionsExternal Factors Evaluation Focus - Collect Data – Analyze and Interpret - Report What we invest Investments $ Collaborative Ventures Researchers Labs & Facilities Research: Conduct studies Design new techniques/ technologies Develop models Dissemination: Publications Citations Patents Networking What the short term results are New Knowledge, technologies, techniques, products developed and commercialize d What the medium term results are Adoption/ use of new knowledge, technologies, techniques, products What the ultimate impact(s) is Needs met Problems solved Opportunities seized Situation Needs, Problems, and Opportunities Priorities: Consider: Mission Vision Values Mandates Resources Local Dynamics Collaborators Competitors Intended Outcomes Generic Research Logic Model Worksheet

22. CSREES Marine Shrimp Virus Research Logic Model SituationInputsActivitiesOutputs Outcomes Legislation: Marine Shrimp Farming Program goal is to reduce American multi- billion dollar trade deficit by developing U.S. shrimp farming industry Problem: New and virulent viral diseases threaten the US & world shrimp farming industry Research needed to mitigate viral threats Research needed on high-priority opportunities to develop a sustainable U.S. commercial shrimp farming industry. US Marine Shrimp Farming Program (USMSP) funds $4 million per year $20 million over 5 year-period Human Capital: Faculty Researchers Industry Labs Basic Research Genetic research for: Identification of shrimp diseases Disease prevention Disease resistance Applied research Production: New pedigree lines for disease resistance New products Marketing Developed Marketing Strategies for shrimp Expanded Knowledge base re Marine Shrimp Viruses Developed biosecurity protocol methods & diagnostic tests Marker- assisted Selection for genetic shrimp stock Develop diagnostic field kits for viruses Disseminat e information via website Breeding strategies for SPF stocks and TSV resistance Use biosecurity and best management practices Reduce water usage rates shrimp produced Reduce Levels of contaminants (TSS, NH3 and CBDO) to lbs of shrimps produced New lines Created due to research Reduction of disease transfer Produce and Distribute Selected stocks Improved economic opportunity for producers & communitie s ShortMediumLong Assumptions- Joint efforts are likely to find better solutions; without the federal lead, research in this areas will not move forward; basic research in genetics is needed and will pay off in applications for combating disease; marketing research needed to complete commercialization External Factors – Shrimp prices, global trade in shrimp broodstock, new shrimp virus outbreak, intensive vs. Extensive management/production facilities, environmental activists’ reactions, transportation issues Dissemination: Publications, citations, patents, Networking; industry briefs Extension Train producers in best management practices

23. Management of Forest and Rangelands Logic Model SituationInputsActivitiesOutputs Outcomes In the 21 st Century, the nation’s forest and grasslands face four threats: Fire and fuels Invasive Species Loss of open space Unmanaged recreation Rehabilitate and restore treatment priorities where risks are the greatest; prevent and contain the spread of invasive species; slow the loss of open space due to development; and manage the use of national forest for outdoor activities to increase the sustainability of our national forests and benefits to the American people A well balanced ecosystem is an imperative backbone for the survival of nation’s natural resources and environmental base. Federal dollars State Appropriations Human Capital: Faculty Researchers Industry Labs Basic Research Determine Influence of fungal associations on fitness of sibling beetles Determine if mycangial fungal associates change in nutrient quality of tissue Identify genes for Dutch Elm disease resistance in American Elm. Identify inhibitors that will reduce growth of branches and apical shoots. Applied research Invasive Species Develop a novel pesticide which uses herbivore and preferential grazing habits of sheep and cattle to offset the damage of leafy spurge Develop semiochemical-based monitoring and protective techniques to enhance integrated control strategy for pine tip moth Calculate changes in regional biogeochemistry due to urban expansion during the past several decades Extension Oregon State will assist ranchers in solving problems related to rangeland ownership and management Assist in revitalization in cooperation with utility companies and encourage the planting of trees around homes and buildings Train producers in use of best management practices Conduct workshops including homeowners, community leaders, fire professionals, insurance company representatives, real estate professionals and others ShortMediumLong-term Increase knowledge of rangelands for land owners and students Invasive species Change beliefs that pesticides must consist of invasive or abrasive agents Identifiy genes for Dutch Elm disease resistance Discover gibberellin synthesis inhibitors Paclobutraz ol and flurprimidol will significantly reduce elongation growth New community partnerships will be developed to increase fire awareness Implement new ways to extend rangeland and environment al issues beyond a political framework Invasive Species Utilize new species to ward off pests Changes in technologies for controlling pests and diseases of urban trees, development of “designer” trees that can adapt to a wide range of urban environment Increase overall individual and community fire awareness and action Habitat iwill be restored at low cost while biodiversity will rebound Recreation & wilderness Lawsuits will be reduced which in turn will save money A healthy, livable and sustainable urban forest ecosystem Increased surveillance to guard against invasive species Identify promising technologies in fire protection Increase economic opportunities for natural resources External Factors – Bio terrorism, invasive species, environmental disasters/concerns, high energy consumption by competitors and global trade of wood products Assumptions – Basic research is needed in identified areas to allow applied research to occur; extensive extension will be needed to alert targeted groups to new technologies and techniques

24. Logic model benefits 1. Improves management Requires that everyone articulate and agree on achievable outcomes Helps provide roadmap for implementation Allows everyone to recognize specific data needed for performance assessment and proof of accomplishments

25. Logic model benefits (cont.) 2. Facilitates evaluation Facilitates the creation of evaluation designs Facilitates the identification and selection of appropriate data elements Facilitates appropriate data collection Helps in the provision of measurable impacts

26. Logic model benefits (cont.) 3. Facilitates accountability reporting and funding decisions Establishes links between problems areas and strategic plan Extremely useful in justifying additional funds Takes fuzziness out of the program Helps in demonstrating attributional links in a chain of activities

27. Use of Honeycomb Graphics Key players; roles and coordination Address questions of overlap and duplication across agencies/depts. Show topic area (Portfolio and PAs) in context of world, U.S. partnersips, federal entities, USDA, and within CSREES

28. Use of Honeycomb graphics Use chart to graphically display portfolio Overview of Portfolio to identify major work needed to accomplish mission, by PAs and science sectors Depict meta-analysis of state of knowledge/ success and work needed in each sector Depict where next grant announcements need to be focused

29. PA 215 PA 213 PA 212 PA 214 PA 211 Insects, Mites and Other Arthropods Affecting Plants Accomplishments Needs Detection/ Diagnosis Prevention Ecology Biology Management Economics and Safety Epidemiology PA 215 PA 213 PA 212 PA 214 PA 211 PA 216 Plant Protection Portfolio Areas of Science:

30. Accomplishments Needs PA 212 Pathogens and Nematodes Affecting Plants Detection and Diagnosis Prevention Ecology Biology Management Economics and Safety Epidemiology Prevention Biology and Ecology Detection & Diagnosis Epidemiology Management Economic Sustainability and Safety Disease free seed and stock for some diseases Breeding resistant plants Novel types of resistance genes Marker assisted selection Ability to identify some unculturable organisms Characterizing take-all suppressive soils Ecology of vectors Genomic sequencing Molecular communication between plants and microbes Programmed cell death Pathogen’s genetic fingerprint used for rapid diagnosis Pathogenicity sequences identified Digital diagnosis / NPDN Seed propagation certification programs Quarantine programs Traditional detection methods Understanding dynamics of spread Understanding mechanisms of spread Forecasting of disease based on knowledge of environmental parameters Biological control –e.g., A. radiobacter, Trichoderma, nematodes Chemical control (pathogen and/or vector) Cultural practices, IPM Disease loss estimates Trade embargoes – international and interstate Safer pesticides, reduced use through IPM Prevention Biology and Ecology Detection & Diagnosis Epidemiology Management Economic Sustainability and Safety Isolate resistance genes, create resistance genes Interfere with mechanisms of signaling, pathogen’s virulence systems Durable resistance (understanding) Functional genomics, proteomics, bioinformatics Non-host resistance Publicly accessible databases for genome- enabled biology Ability to detect individuals within a microbial population Rapid / high-throughput methods of detection (user friendly/economical) Genomic reclassification of microbial taxonomy Culture collection and characterization, and specific DNA probes for identification Other pathogens genetic fingerprint for rapid diagnosis Other pathogenicity sequences Influence of global change on pathogen spread and disease establishment Accurate determination of disease origin BC agents – establishment, mechanisms, compatibility Alternatives to methyl bromide Post-harvest disease Chemical induction of resistance Chemical resistance management Better understanding of impacts of diseases Development of sustainable production practices Development of trace-back PA 215 PA 213 PA 212 PA 214 PA 211 PA 216 Plant Protection Portfolio

31. Use of Research Evaluation as Leadership Tool The PART and BPI have raised consciousness and focused attention on post-project management and use of evaluation results for planning

32. Summary Use of Logic Models and Portfolio graphics provide clear and concise maps of work Meaningful outcome indicators for OMB PART and BPI provided via scores from panel Panelists provided useful recommendations Managers have used PREP recommendations in planning, writing RFAs, budget, etc.

33. Summary (Cont.) PREP process provided panelists with new insights in planning and accountability to spread around US PREP improved panelists’ understanding and willingness to integrate their activities into the overall federal goals identified

34. Contact Information Telephone: 202/ 720-5623 Fax: 202/ 720-7714 CSREES Web site: www.csrees.usda.gov www.csrees.usda.gov Email: coros@csrees.usda.govcoros@csrees.usda.gov