Aims Aims Three jobs: Management of DS Dissemination of information Comparison between facilities Carried out by 3 bodies: GB + MB + CB DB + members of EURO Experts led by Carlo Wyss (input from WPM, MB, etc)
Tasks Tasks Coordination task: coordination of the contractual, financial and administrative aspects of the Design Study, including delivery of annual reports and control of the funds. Oversight task: oversight of the technical and scientific aspects of the Design Study, including the monitoring of milestones and ensuring that deliverables are produced on time. Knowledge task: management of the knowledge generated by the Design Study, including its protection, use and dissemination. Comparison task: comparison between the three facilities, based on their physics reach and cost, taking into account the knowledge of the neutrino oscillation parameters available at that time. Determination of the criteria to be used. Production of a priority list, based on this comparison.
Dissemination Dissemination All publications (internal & external) on website All external publications refereed: journals – DB member + consortium expert proceedings – expert Referees responsible for getting comments Making sure theyre implemented Reporting to DB DB authorisation required before publication
Comparison Comparison Needs to be independent: Carlo Wyss identified as chair Other experts to be identified Use IAP Exact mode of operation still to be defined Will use performance from machine design performance of detectors physics reach Output: Comparison Recommendations for next step(s)
Planning Planning ActionDone by Create websiteM1 Create IAPM1 Create DBM1 Find other external expertsM3 Define how comparison should be madeM6 Report of 1 st year activitiesM12 Define criteria for comparisonM18 Interim reportM24 Project review documentationM36 Comparison between facilitiesM46 Final reportM48