We think you have liked this presentation. If you wish to download it, please recommend it to your friends in any social system. Share buttons are a little bit lower. Thank you!
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byEmily Weaver
Modified over 4 years ago
Combining Analysis strands in a Main Gate Submission
© Dstl 2001 Dstl is part of the Ministry of Defence July 2001 Analysis questions for Business Case How good does the ship need to be in its primary role? How balanced is the ship across all of its capabilities? Is the solution cost-effective? How many ships should be bought?
© Dstl 2001 Dstl is part of the Ministry of Defence July 2001 Bring together three strands of analysis Platform Numbers Study Decision Conferencing Combat System OA
© Dstl 2001 Dstl is part of the Ministry of Defence July 2001 Decision Conferencing Process Structured series of stakeholder meetings to: –identify significantly different options for capability functions –evaluate cost of each option and its benefits against a range of criteria –judge relative importance of differences between options and between criteria –use supporting tool to derive theoretically optimum outline design –modify theoretical design by applying additional judgement
© Dstl 2001 Dstl is part of the Ministry of Defence July 2001 Benefits of Conferencing Approach Examined full breadth of the platform and combat system; Unearthed critical issues; Winnowed down the vast number of potential combinations of elements of the platform and combat system; Achieved a high degree of consensus across a broad range of MOD stakeholders; Identified areas requiring more detailed analysis; Provided a starting point (ball-park) for the prime contractors design process; Provided part of the audit trail at Main Gate for why the proposed design was appropriate and cost effective
© Dstl 2001 Dstl is part of the Ministry of Defence July 2001 Concerns about the Conferencing Approach Fundamentally judgemental Does not take account of interactions between capabilities Complexity of judgements Apparent precision of outputs Limited consideration of scenarios Treatment of Life Cycle Costs
© Dstl 2001 Dstl is part of the Ministry of Defence July 2001 Combat System Analysis Methods Area 1 –Military Judgement Panels - Soft –Monte Carlo Simulation Battle Model - Hard Area 2 –Parallel Applied Research Programme (ARP) Study –Performance figures for systems - Performance –Military Judgement Panel - with appropriate experts - Soft –insights from previous analysis work - Soft/Hard Area 3 –Parallel ARP study - Performance –OA to assess implications of performance - Hard
© Dstl 2001 Dstl is part of the Ministry of Defence July 2001 Steps in Combat System Analysis Identify a number of combination options for each Area Evaluate each combination option with the techniques listed Extract findings on each combination option Extract findings on each system of interest Summarise implications for differing levels of capability through life
© Dstl 2001 Dstl is part of the Ministry of Defence July 2001 Bringing it together Platform Numbers Study demonstrated the number of ships required Decision Conferencing process identified militarily acceptable options with good benefit/cost For systems identified as needing further detailed work, the Combat System OA identified the option level required to avoid significant shortfalls Comparisons were made of the cost and qualitative effectiveness of alternative combinations of options
© Dstl 2001 Dstl is part of the Ministry of Defence July 2001 Combat System Option Individual System Options Findings on Individual System Options
© Dstl 2001 Dstl is part of the Ministry of Defence July 2001 Features of the Analysis Consideration of evolution of capability (First of Class (FOC) and Class) –implications of many ships at FOC capability for several years Close working on high level and system level OA Combination of broad/judgemental and deep/analytical methods Results included both qualitative and quantitative
© Dstl 2001 Dstl is part of the Ministry of Defence July 2001 Future Improvements Expend greater effort on problem structuring –bring in additional techniques –recognition that this brings much of the benefit and is key in driving the solution space Maximising the supporting evidence to the judgements Ensure the broad and deep analyses work together –e.g. broad - deep - broad approach
Qualifications Update: Engineering Science Qualifications Update: Engineering Science.
Options appraisal, the business case & procurement
Risk Management Introduction Risk Management Fundamentals
Division of Information Management Engineering User Interface Laboratory 11 Fall 09 Human Interface UI Evaluating Design Proposals for Complex Systems.
SAS-087 TG-034 on Code of Best Practice for Judgement-based OA Background information for ISMOR 2010 Syndicate Session Diederik Wijnmalen Strategic Choices.
Unit 4 – Assignment 3 Today you will know the requirements of assignment 3. You will understand the assessment criteria for P4, M1 & D1. You will be able.
Environment case Episode 3 - CAATS II Final Dissemination Event Brussels, 13 & 14 Oct 2009 Hellen Foster, Jarlath Molloy NATS, Imperial College London.
What is moderation and why should we moderate?
What makes a good project?. A testing ground for concepts presented in the taught programme An opportunity to demonstrate the ability to apply knowledge.
Dr Jim Briggs Masterliness Not got an MSc myself; BA DPhil; been teaching masters students for 18 years.
ABEL ISMOR Presentation Slide 1 Examining Soldier Performance Throughout A 48 Hour Battlefield Mission Development of the ABEL Model in Support of the.
Role of actuarial function supporting the FLAOR leading to the ORSA Ian Morris June 2014.
TRAiDE™ is a trademark of BAE SYSTEMS. US patent applied for. © Copyright BAE Systems All rights reserved 1 Exploiting Modelling to Improve Decision-
AUDIT COMMITTEE FORUM TM ACF Roundtable IT Governance – what does it mean to you as an audit committee member July 2010 The AUDIT COMMITTEE FORUM TM is.
Decision Making Reviewing and Selecting Solutions.
1 Regulatory Impact Assessment: Methodology and Best Practices David Shortall INMETRO International Workshop on Conformity Assessment Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Dr. Robert Mayes University of Wyoming Science and Mathematics Teaching Center
Self-Assessment for Continuous Improvement: Tools and Techniques 16 September 2009.
Symposium on "The Effectiveness of Modelling and Simulation” MSG-031 Briefing on Progress so farPoland, 13 October 2005 Progress to date on NMSG 031 The.
Chapter Seven Event Budgeting.
© 2018 SlidePlayer.com Inc. All rights reserved.