1. Page 1 2P13 Week 9

2. Page 2 Table 9.2 Scheduling Criteria User Oriented, Performance Related Turnaround time This is the interval of time between the submission of a process and its completion. Includes actual execution time plus time spent waiting for resources, including the processor. This is an appropriate measure for a batch job. Response time For an interactive process, this is the time from the submission of a request until the response begins to be received. Often a process can begin producing some output to the user while continuing to process the request. Thus, this is a better measure than turnaround time from the user's point of view. The scheduling discipline should attempt to achieve low response time and to maximize the number of interactive users receiving acceptable response time. Deadlines When process completion deadlines can be specified, the scheduling discipline should subordinate other goals to that of maximizing the percentage of deadlines met. User Oriented, Other Predictability A given job should run in about the same amount of time and at about the same cost regardless of the load on the system. A wide variation in response time or turnaround time is distracting to users. It may signal a wide swing in system workloads or the need for system tuning to cure instabilities. System Oriented, Performance Related Throughput The scheduling policy should attempt to maximize the number of processes completed per unit of time. This is a measure of how much work is being performed. This clearly depends on the average length of a process but is also influenced by the scheduling policy, which may affect utilization. Processor utilization This is the percentage of time that the processor is busy. For an expensive shared system, this is a significant criterion. In single-user systems and in some other systems, such as real-time systems, this criterion is less important than some of the others. System Oriented, Other Fairness In the absence of guidance from the user or other system-supplied guidance, processes should be treated the same, and no process should suffer starvation. Enforcing priorities When processes are assigned priorities, the scheduling policy should favor higher-priority processes. Balancing resources The scheduling policy should keep the resources of the system busy. Processes that will underutilize stressed resources should be favored. This criterion also involves medium-term and long-term scheduling.

3. Page 3

4. Page 4 Table 9.4 Process Scheduling Example ProcessArrival TimeService Time A03 B26 C44 D65 E82

5. Page 5

6. Page 6

7. Page 7

8. Page 8

9. Page 9

10. Page 10 Table 10.1 Synchronization Granularity and Processes Grain SizeDescriptionSynchronization Interval (Instructions) FineParallelism inherent in a single instruction stream. <20 MediumParallel processing or multitasking within a single application 20-200 CoarseMultiprocessing of concurrent processes in a multiprogramming environment 200-2000 Very CoarseDistributed processing across network nodes to form a single computing environment 2000-1M IndependentMultiple unrelated processesnot applicable

11. Page 11

12. Page 12 Features of Real-Time OS Fast process or thread switch Small size Ability to respond to external interrupts quickly MultiTasking with inter-process communication tools, semaphores, signals, and events. Use of special sequential files that can accumulate data at a fast rate Pre-emptive scheduling based on priority Minimize duration interval when interrupts are disabled Primitives to delay tasks for a fixed amount of time and to pause/resume tasks Special alarms and timeouts.

13. Page 13

14. Page 14 Static table-driven approaches performs a static analysis of feasible schedules of dispatching result is a schedule that determines, at run time, when a task must begin execution Static priority-driven preemptive approaches a static analysis is performed but no schedule is drawn up analysis is used to assign priorities to tasks so that a traditional priority-driven preemptive scheduler can be used Dynamic planning-based approaches feasibility is determined at run time rather than offline prior to the start of execution one result of the analysis is a schedule or plan that is used to decide when to dispatch this task Dynamic best effort approaches no feasibility analysis is performed system tries to meet all deadlines and aborts any started process whose deadline is missed

15. Page 15 Real-time operating systems are designed with the objective of starting real-time tasks as rapidly as possible and emphasize rapid interrupt handling and task dispatching Real-time applications are generally not concerned with sheer speed but rather with completing (or starting) tasks at the most valuable times Priorities provide a crude tool and do not capture the requirement of completion (or initiation) at the most valuable time

16. Page 16 resources required by the task while it is executing Resource requirements measures relative importance of the task Priority a task may be decomposed into a mandatory subtask and an optional subtask Subtask scheduler time task becomes ready for execution Ready time time task must begin Starting deadline time task must be completed Completion deadline time required to execute the task to completion Processing time

17. Page 17 Table 10.2 Execution Profile of Two Periodic Tasks ProcessArrival TimeExecution TimeEnding Deadline A(1)01020 A(2)201040 A(3)401060 A(4)601080 A(5)8010100 B(1)02550 B(2)5025100

18. Page 18 Figure 10.5 Scheduling of Periodic Real-Time Tasks With Completion Deadlines (Based on Table 10.2)

19. Page 19 Figure 10.6 Scheduling of Aperiodic Real-Time Tasks With Starting Deadlines

20. Page 20 Table 10.3 Execution Profile of Five Aperiodic Tasks ProcessArrival TimeExecution TimeStarting Deadline A1020110 B20 C402050 D 2090 E602070

21. Page 21 Figure 10.7 Rate Monotonic Schedulin g

22. Page 22 Periodic Task Timing Diagram Figure 10.8

23. Page 23 The End