Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Photos placed in horizontal position with even amount of white space between photos and header Sandia National Laboratories is a multi-program laboratory.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Photos placed in horizontal position with even amount of white space between photos and header Sandia National Laboratories is a multi-program laboratory."— Presentation transcript:

1 Photos placed in horizontal position with even amount of white space between photos and header Sandia National Laboratories is a multi-program laboratory managed and operated by Sandia Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Lockheed Martin Corporation, for the U.S. Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration under contract DE-AC04-94AL85000. SAND NO. 2011-XXXXP 2-D Electron and Metastable Density Profiles Produced in Helium FIW Discharges B. R. Weatherford and E. V. Barnat Sandia National Laboratories Z. Xiong and M. J. Kushner University of Michigan

2 Fast Ionization Waves (FIWs)  Nanosecond-duration, overvoltage (> breakdown) E-fields  Diffuse volume discharge at elevated pressures  High-energy electrons efficiently drive inelastic processes  Ideal for large volume, uniform, high pressure production of:  Photons  Charged particles  Excited species  Proposed Applications:  Pulsed UV light sources / laser pumping  High-pressure plasma chemistry  Plasma-assisted combustion  Runaway electron generation 2

3 Current Understanding of FIWs  Axial FIW propagation studied extensively  Capacitive probes  Average E-fields, e - density  Optical emission  2-D profiles, wave speeds  Laser diagnostics  Spatially resolved E-fields  Radial variations important, but still unclear  Varying E-field? Higher density or T e ? Photons?  Applications may require volume uniformity  What do profiles tell us about the physics? 3 Increasing Pressure Vasilyak (1994) Takashima (2011) Positive Polarity Negative Polarity Helium FIW, 20 Torr, 11 kV

4 Experimental Setup - Chamber  Discharge Tube: 3.3 cm ID x 25.4 cm long  HV electrode inside Teflon sleeve, grounded shield  Imaged area: 20-140 mm from ground electrode  Helium feed gas  Pressure 1-20 Torr  ~14 kV (open load) +HV pulses  20 ns duration, 3 ns rise time  1 kHz pulse rep rate 4

5 2-D LCIF Diagnostic Scheme  2-D maps of electron densities acquired from helium line intensity ratios  Pump 2 3 S metastables to 3 3 P with 389 nm laser  Electron collisions transfer from 3 3 P  3 3 D  Image LIF @ 389 nm (3 3 P-2 3 S) and LCIF @ 588 nm (3 3 D-2 3 P) after the laser pulse  Ratio depends linearly on e- density 5 Barnat (2009)

6 Electron Densities vs. Pressure  Density maps @ fixed rep rate & voltage, 1-16 Torr  ICCD delay time: 100 ns after FIW, 20 ns window  Peak densities on scale of 10 11 cm -3 for all pressures  Low P  center-peaked  High P  wall-peaked  Max uniformity, n e at intermediate pressure 6 Wavefront Motion Increasing Pressure Key Questions: What causes the transition in e - densities? Can we explain this with a model? Key Questions: What causes the transition in e - densities? Can we explain this with a model?

7 Metastable Densities vs. Pressure  Helium 2 3 S metastable profiles, 1-16 Torr  Relative densities from LIF intensities  Laser absorption measurements for calibration (B. Yee)  Same general trends, but less drastic than n e  Center-peaked to volume- filling / uniform  Similar FIW decay lengths 7 Wavefront Motion Increasing Pressure

8 Simulation Results - nonPDPSIM  2-D fluid simulation  Photon transport  Stepwise ionization  Plasma chemistry  EEDF calculated from two- term expansion of Boltzmann equation  Same voltage pulse shape as in experiment  Simulations produce similar results as LCIF  N e ~ 10 11 -10 12 cm -3  Trend in radial profiles with variable pressure  Wave velocities ~ cm/ns 8 1 Torr Profiles 16 Torr Profiles (Xiong and Kushner)

9 Electrons vs. Metastables 9  Experiment: n e, N He* have different radial profiles @ high pressure  Metastables shifted to center  Model: n e, N He* track each other  Model results rule out:  Volume photoionization  Photoelectrons from wall nene 16 Torr Profiles - Simulation N He* Key Questions: Why are these profiles different? What does this say about FIW physics? Key Questions: Why are these profiles different? What does this say about FIW physics? He* Profiles - Experiment (Behind wavefront) nene N He* Top: Experiment Bottom: Simulation

10 E-field, Effective T e Distributions 10  Simulations  Strong radial E near wall  Exceeds runaway e- threshold (~210 Td in He)  Radial E exceeds axial E in and behind FIW front  1 Torr: Mean e - energy nearly uniform  E-field fills much of the volume  16 Torr: Mean e - energy highest at wall  E-field drops rapidly away from wall  Electrons cool via collisions 16 Torr – T e and E 1 Torr – T e and E Axis Axial & Radial E, 16 Torr Inside wavefront Wall Axial & Radial E, 16 Torr Behind wavefront Axis Wall

11 Effect of Runaway Electrons  σ iz peaks near 150 eV, σ He* at 30 eV  Radial fast e- flux in cylindrical geometry  competing processes:  Focusing of e - flux, scales as 1/r  Loss of “fast” flux via inelastic collisions  Cooling of fast electrons via elastic collisions  1-D production profiles estimated due to radial runaway e - flux from wall 11 Electron cooling  separated e - and He* profiles Fixed energy vs. r captures pressure trend Ionization, 2 3 S Cross-sections 30 eV e-, constant energy 4 Torr, with collisional cooling Initial Energies

12 Summary  2-D maps of electron and 2 3 S metastable densities in a positive polarity He FIW measured using LCIF/LIF  Center-peaked n e at low pressure, wall-peaked at high pressure  Metastable profiles shift from center-peaked to volume-filling  Intermediate pressures  highest densities and uniformity  2-D fluid simulations capture similar trends in n e  Peak e- densities of 10 11 -10 12 cm -3 ; shift in radial profiles  Predicts metastable distributions which track e - densities  Radial E-fields yielding runaway e - may explain the difference  Runaway electrons are difficult to capture in fluid model  Dropoff in E at high pressure  fast e - from walls lose energy  High energy  ionization; Lower energy  metastable production  Energy decay along radius causes spatial separation in profiles 12

13 Thank you!  Questions?  Comments? This work was supported by the Department of Energy Office of Fusion Energy Science Contract DE-SC0001939. 13


Download ppt "Photos placed in horizontal position with even amount of white space between photos and header Sandia National Laboratories is a multi-program laboratory."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google