Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Mike Evans NWS / WFO BGM. CSTAR V – Severe convection in scenarios with low-predictive skill SUNY Albany researchers are examining SPC forecasts and associated.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Mike Evans NWS / WFO BGM. CSTAR V – Severe convection in scenarios with low-predictive skill SUNY Albany researchers are examining SPC forecasts and associated."— Presentation transcript:

1 Mike Evans NWS / WFO BGM

2 CSTAR V – Severe convection in scenarios with low-predictive skill SUNY Albany researchers are examining SPC forecasts and associated severe weather occurrence to identify events with low-predictive skill. Their project covers the CONUS, with an emphasis on the northeast. Goal will be to identify environments with low predictive skill, and to improve forecasts in those environments.

3 Local study outline Examine day 1 NWS BGM forecasts issued on the midnight shift from 2011-August 2014. Define a “warning” as any time Hazardous Weather Outlook product indicates “severe”, “large hail” or “damaging wind” during the next 24 hours. Define an “event” as a day when at least 5 severe weather reports were received. How good are our warnings? What factors influence the quality of our warnings? Note… Joe Villani in Albany has been working on a similar study for the ALY county warning area.

4 Hazardous Weather Outlooks Example of a “warning”Example of a “non-warning”

5 How many severe reports are needed for an “event” to be identified? So… bigger events are more likely to be caught than marginal events. Using a high threshold results in lots of false alarms. For the rest of this study, an event is defined as 5 or more reports.

6 POD and FAR

7 POD and FAR by month Events: 5 10 13 17 7 6 1 59 Warnings: 7 14 15 24 7 8 1 76

8 POD and FAR by season Events: 22 37 Warnings: 30 46

9 Do “dry-spells” bias our forecasts? Events: 7 of 15 30 of 44

10 What about the large-scale environment? Define – “good forecast” events as events with a warning. Define – “over-achieving” events as events with no warning. Define – “under-achieving” events as a warning issued with no event.

11 POD and FAR MLCAPE (J/kg) 0-3 km shear (kt)

12 High CAPE / High shear events

13 Low CAPE / High shear events

14 High CAPE / Low shear events

15 Summary

16 Example – June 24, 2013

17 SPC damaging wind outlook

18 SPC hail outlook

19 500 mb heights and vorticity

20 Sea-level pressure and satellite

21 2 hour RAP Sounding at BGM valid 20z

22 Radar reflectivity animation

23 BGM Hazardous Weather Outlook – issued at 422 AM June 24, 2013 “SCATTERED THUNDERSTORMS ARE EXPECTED TODAY WITH THE BEST CHANCES THIS AFTERNOON… SOME MAY CONTAIN HEAVY RAINFALL”.

24 Severe reports – June 24, 2013 22 large hail reports 16 damaging wind reports 7 days since the previous severe weather occurrence

25 Future Work Results from this study and work at ALY will be compared to results from the larger study at SUNY ALY. These results will be available next year.


Download ppt "Mike Evans NWS / WFO BGM. CSTAR V – Severe convection in scenarios with low-predictive skill SUNY Albany researchers are examining SPC forecasts and associated."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google