1. NIST Priority Action Plan 9 Demand Response and Distributed Energy Resource Signal Semantics Meeting 20090929-30 Presentation to Energy Interoperation TC 20091007

2. Overview PAP09 Workshop August 3-4 – Unanimous agreement on plan – Execution under way Update and review September 29-30 PAPs 3, 4, 9, 10 – Broad discussion – Issues arising from work in progress Summary output – No present work is invalidated – Coordination goals and approach to IEC TC57 Common Information Model – Deeper understanding 2EITC 20091007

3. Slides from Meeting Following are slides from the meeting. Full notes are at – http://collaborate.nist.gov/twiki-sggrid/bin/view/SmartGrid/PAP34910MeetingPage http://collaborate.nist.gov/twiki-sggrid/bin/view/SmartGrid/PAP34910MeetingPage Socialized approach among stakeholders Broader context for work – EnergyInterop, ZigBee work in parallel – Feedback to IEC CIM Requirements input from utility industry and ISOs through NAESB – Review of high level NAESB document in progress 3EITC 20091007

4. Requirements Capture Process From NIST Workshop 20090929-30 4EITC 20091007

5. Multipath Approach From NIST Workshop 20090929-30 5EITC 20091007

6. PAP 9 Responsibility Breakdown EITC 200910076 From NIST Workshop 20090929-30

7. EITC 200910077 Consensus IEC 61968 CIM alignment Reuse where appropriate from published DR components with IEC 61968 CIM family for PAP9 work If someone is developing extensions, submit them to IEC (TC57) for approval (loopback) Incorporate where appropriate from OpenADR-OASIS Common semantic model for inter-domain interfaces Scope boundaries fuzzy (need to solve) How deep do the definitions (semantics vs. syntax) go? (need to solve) Utility commitment to IEC 61968 CIM family becomes a boundary requirement Tactical: Need a mechanism for a joint TF to allow parties from each organization to participate in effort and share work products From NIST Workshop 20090929-30

8. EITC 200910078 PAP 9 Tasks Identified [AGREED] TaskResponsibleDateNotes Define proper DER Interaction, ScopeLunch table discussion; later readout to Action Team List Input before 2009-10 x2G DEWGs, IEC TC57. Storage Models IEEE1547.3, NAESB PAP07 Outcome, PAP11 Elec Trans Collect, Analyze, and Consolidate Use Cases and deliver UML (inc DER) UCAIug, NAESB2009-10Incorporating OpenADR (Starting point for OASIS EITC). No Magic. For Residential Applications Message Semantics Work DR, DER, Calendar, Price IEC/ZigBeeUnderway For C+I Applications Message Semantics Work DR, DER, Calendar, Price IEC/OASISUnderwayStarting from OpenADR. Review by UNCIug,, 1377, NAESB, BAE, SEP, TC57, MultiSpeak, others Coordinate and merge residential and C+I development tracks NAESBLoop back to IEC process Send residential and C+I task outputs to IEC TC57OASIS/ZigBee Downstream user requirements/engagementLonMark, BACnet, ZigBee SEP2 2009-10BACnet, LonMark, HES, x2G, UPnP, OpenHAN, ZigBee, SEP, oBIX, AHAM, UCAIug, NEMA Additional message requirements for DistributionMultiSpeak2009-10 Resale and process for safety and interconnection and resale NAESB2009-10UL VocabularyNAESB, UCAIug, BACnet, LonMark TWIKI ASAP 2009-09 to [UML] Normalize OpenADR, NAESB, UCAIG, Place on TWIKI Deliver to OASIS EITC From NIST Workshop 20090929-30

9. EITC 200910079 PAP 4/3 Tasks Identified [AGREED] TaskResponsibleDateNotes Develop high level scoping operations document NAESBBill Cox and others can contribute. DEWGs, No Magic, Ron Melton --Develop high level use casesBAE (volunteer)11/09BAE, et al have already completed. Submit to NAESB and review operational definitions. --Develop price requirementsNAESBFIX, JPM, FISD, NARUC/NAESB, ISO/RTO CTO?, EEI, AHAM, ZigBee, OpenHAN, OASIS --Data modelOASIS, ZigBeeOngoingEMIX; FIX; IEC/CIM coord (Saxton) --Draft pricing specification (to multiple locations) OASIS, ZigBee4/10OASIS, ZigBee to submit to IEC (TC57, SG3 and others) after NAESB review. data model, XML expression?, No Magic. Review by FIX, CalConnect, FIATECH, NIBS, DEWGs, others Import material from PAP4 where appropriate IETF12/09 draft DEWGs, FIATECH, others Meet and present deliverables at GRID-INTEROP NAESB11/09 From NIST Workshop 20090929-30

10. Members of Energy Interoperation TC Attending These members of the EITC attended the NIST meeting: – Ed Cazalet – Toby Considine – William Cox – Girish Ghatikar – David Holmberg – Jeremy Roberts OASIS Staff – James Bryce Clark 10EITC 20091007

11. Affect on Energy Interoperation TC Planning Requirements – Better and broader input (ISO, UCA, utilities) – Better focus – Not universal Need facility input (have from membership) Need industrial, home, other input (limited) – Need appropriate level Review current draft (elsewhere in the agenda) 11EITC 20091007

12. Action Plan Explanation The phrases “residential” and “C&I” are shorthand for what Toby and others call “Managed” and “Collaborative” energy “Managed Energy” refers to a direct load control-type approach, as exemplified in OpenHAN and ZigBee Smart Energy Profile – Though there are information aspects as well The EITC is doing Collaborative Energy The responsibilities listed are EITC; target for work and review is the IEC CIM team. The EITC is doing more than just the work in PAP09 – That work is also in liaison process with IEC TC57 and other TCs 12EITC 20091007

13. Other Action Items Vocabulary – Under way, need to work with NAESB and other vocabulary efforts “Downstream user requirements” are not well-represented in NAESB Requirements Process – Action on EITC members to engage – Action for I2G DEWG and others to engage – Separate slides on NAESB draft input 13EITC 20091007