1. Quadrennial Review Retrospective performance review every 4 years Standardized to fairly evaluate Staff Scientists despite various roles Success judged by independent scientific achievement and/or contributions to collaborations/team science Functions of Quad review evaluate continuation/placement determine salary adjustment track allocation of personnel resources

2. Quad Review Package You and your PI should assemble the package together. Package contains: Check Sheet Standardized Recommending memo from PI 2 letters of recommendation from collaborators Standardized CV and biblio BSC Recommendations Review Report

3. Recommending Memo Your PI is asked to describe your accomplishments in the following areas: 1. Scientific Productivity 2. Scientific Presentations 3. Participation in Special Interest Groups, Tech Transfer, Involvement in GMP production, INDs, etc. 4. Collaborations 5. Mentoring/Teaching 6. Continuing Education (training programs participated in) 7. Awards 8. Other significant achievements 9. Description of Core activities, list of collaborators and/or users: (For Facility Heads who are not reviewed by the BSC)

4. Standardized CV Membership in Scientific Societies/Professional Associations: Honors & Scientific Recognition: Awards received Fellowships received Editorial Board of Scientific Journal Reviewer for Scientific Journals Membership in Reviewing Boards (grant application boards etc.) Invited Lectureships Chairpersonships Funding: Grants and Funding Received Technology Transfer - CRADA relationships Patents: Employee Invention Reports Patent applications Patents awarded

5. Standarized CV Collaborations: Intramural Extramural Scientific Community Activities: Academic appointments Mentoring Participation in Intramural Faculties & Special Interest Groups Participation In Intramural Committees Clinical Trial Participation – role: Investigational New Drug (IND) Applications Submitted: FDA approvals: Consultant Appointments: Institutional Review Boards: Proposals submitted and approved Core/Program Accomplishments: PRESENTATIONS BIBLIOGRAPHY

6. Quad Review Panel CCR PRP provides the core expertise 12 scientists representing a cross-section of CCR research meet monthly to review Staff Scientist appointments familiar with accomplishments expected from Staff Scientists ad hoc reviewers are recruited to assist with the Quad Review Three reviewers are assigned to evaluate each package reviewers submit brief evaluations and preliminary score reviews compiled and grouped by rank Review meeting begins with a discussion of the review criteria Individual packages are discussed rankings adjusted taking into consideration mitigating issues scientific environment, mentoring, duties, etc.

7. Quad Report Rank 1-1.9 Outstanding 2-2.9 Excellent 3-3.9 Good 4-4.9 Satisfactory 5 Unsatisfactory Needs Improvement in Productivity Collaboration Participation in faculties/special interest groups Scientific presentations Teaching/mentoring Continuing education/training Core activities Other

8. Number of Staff Scientists (Total 110) Results 10 40 50 30 Outstanding Excellent Good Satisfactory Quad Review Scores 2006-2009 16 1 46 48 20