Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Federal Accountability AYP Update Accountability TETN February 17, 2011 Shannon Housson and Ester Regalado TEA, Performance Reporting Division.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Federal Accountability AYP Update Accountability TETN February 17, 2011 Shannon Housson and Ester Regalado TEA, Performance Reporting Division."— Presentation transcript:

1 Federal Accountability AYP Update Accountability TETN February 17, 2011 Shannon Housson and Ester Regalado TEA, Performance Reporting Division

2 2 AYP Topics 2010 AYP Results Preview of 2011 and Texas AYP Workbook – Graduation Rate Targets – TPM in AYP – Federal Cap Requested Amendments for reporting 2012 AYP AYP Transition Plan Options for 2012 and Beyond

3 AYP State Summary Results District Results AYP Status Final 2009 Results Final 2010 Results Meets AYP1,00081%96978% Missed AYP20917%25020% Not Evaluated262%181% TOTAL1,235100%1,237100%

4 AYP State Summary Results Campus Results (Regular and Charter) AYP Status Final 2009 Results Final 2010 Results Meets AYP6,73681%7,24186% Missed AYP3534%3684% Not Evaluated1,23315%82610% TOTAL8,322100%8,435100%

5 AYP State Summary Results Of those missing AYP, 66.0% (165) of districts and 4.6% (17) of campuses missed AYP solely due to the 1% and/or 2% caps in 2010, compared to 53.1% of districts and 6.2% of campuses in A total of 111 campuses missed the Mathematics Performance indicator, the largest category that failed to Meet AYP standards.

6 AYP School Improvement Program (SIP) Results District Results SIP Stage Identification Final 2009 Results Final 2010 Results Stage %8446% Stage %6335% Stage %3519% TOTAL %182100%

7 7 Campus Results SIP Stage Identification Final 2009 Results Final 2010 Results Stage %8137% Stage %4722% Stage %2813% Stage %2411% Stage 5 309%3817% TOTAL %218100% 2010 AYP School Improvement Program (SIP) Results

8 Preview 2011 AYP performance standards increase to: 80% in Reading/English language arts 75% in Mathematics Graduate Rate annual targets may not change; Participation/Attendance Rate Indicator standards remain unchanged. Texas Projection Measure (TPM) will continue to be used; TPM for TAKS-Modified (TAKS-M) grades 3 and 6 will be phased in. The 2% Federal Cap on TAKS-Modified (TAKS-M) will continue to include TAKS-M TPM values projected to meet the passing standard.

9 Graduation Rate Requirement 2011 Federal Requirements To set annual graduation rate targets that reflect continuous and substantial improvement from the prior year toward meeting or exceeding the states graduation rate goal amendment requests were limited to school year calculations. Amendments to 2011 AYP, submitted in December 2010, request no changes in the graduation rate targets for

10 Graduation Rate Goals/Targets The graduation rate calculations that were approved by the United States Department of Education (USDE) include five alternatives for districts and campuses to meet the required goal and targets: – 4-year longitudinal Annual Graduation Rate Goal of 90.0%. – 5-year longitudinal Annual Graduation Rate Target of 80%. 10

11 Graduation Rate Goals/Targets – 4-year Annual Graduation Rate Target of 75% – 4-year Graduation Rate Alternatives: o Safe Harbor Target A 10.0 percent decrease in difference between the prior year 4-year Graduation Rate and the 90.0 percent statewide goal o Improvement Target A 1.0 percent increase from the prior year 4-year Graduation Rate 11

12 Graduation Rate Requirement 2012 Federal Requirements 2012 AYP will include the evaluation of disaggregated cohort graduation rate data to determine AYP. All seven student groups will be evaluated on the goals/targets for the Graduation Rate indicator. Currently, the AYP graduation rate calculations used to determine the Other Indicator results for secondary schools evaluate the All Student group only. 12

13 13 TPM in AYP Texas Projection Measure (TPM) TPM was used for the first time in 2009 AYP evaluations. Students who are projected to meet the standard are counted in the numerator of the AYP performance rate along with students meeting the standard, and this new percent is compared with the AYP targets to determine if the performance standard is met. TPM will continue to be used for 2011 AYP evaluations.

14 14 1% AYP Federal Cap Students are selected randomly from TAKS-Alt results. TAKS-Alt results processed for the cap include: Meet Standard on TAKS-Alt, On track to meet the TAKS-Alt standard based on the TAKS-Alt Growth Measure. Exceptions to the 1% cap will be processed prior to the Preliminary AYP Release in August 2011.

15 15 1% AYP Federal Cap Exceptions to the 1% cap will be applied to school districts : registered with the TEA Special Education Residential Facilities Tracking System (RF Tracker) for school year included in the Directory for Services for the Deaf in Texas, Regional Day School Programs for the Deaf (RDSPD). Other Circumstance Exceptions to the 1% Cap are allowable and may be submitted as a regular appeal through the AYP Appeal online system.

16 16 2% AYP Federal Cap The 2% Federal Cap process includes: Step 1) TEA prioritizes campuses by grades served and proportion of students with disabilities enrolled. School districts have the opportunity to review and/or modify the campus rankings. Step 2) Student results are selected in order to maximize the number of campuses that Meet AYP beginning with the campuses assigned the highest priority.

17 17 2% AYP Federal Cap TAKS-M proficient results are selected and processed for the cap from results that: Meet Standard on TAKS-M, Projected to meet the TAKS-M standard based on TPM (for school year , TPM on TAKS-M is available for grades 3, 4, 6, 7, and 10 only).

18 18 AYP Federal Caps 1% and 2% Federal Caps Reminder: The federal cap relates to counting students as proficient for AYP purposes only and does not limit the number of students that may take an alternate assessment. State policies and procedures related to assessment decision-making are detailed in the TEA publication titled Admission, Review, and Dismissal (ARD) Committee Decision-Making Process for the Texas Assessment Program.

19 19 AYP Federal Caps 2011 Training on the Federal Cap A review of the federal cap process will be provided through a district accessible Texas Education Telecommunications Network (TETN) session on Friday, May 20, 2011 from 9am-12pm. (Event # 10007). Contact your school district or ESC for more information Campus Priority List for 2% Federal Cap will be released on May 19, Deadline for 2011 Campus Priority List for 2% Federal Cap is June 24, 2011.

20 20 Assessments used in AYP * Students in their First Year in U. S. Schools are counted as participants, but excluded from the performance calculation Reading/ELA Assessments Participation 95% Standard Performance ( Accountability Subset) 80% Standard Total Students Number Participating Number Tested Met Standard or TPM/Growth TAKSYesIf participant If in the Accountability subset If standard is met or if projected to meet standard by TPM TAKS (Accommodated) YesIf participant If in the Accountability subset If standard is met or if projected to meet standard by TPM TAKS-M / LAT TAKS-M * YesIf participant If in the Accountability subset If standard is met or if projected to meet standard by TPM (subject to 2% cap) TAKS-AltYesIf participant If in the Accountability subset If standard is met or if on track to meet standard by growth (subject to 1% cap) TELPAS Reading* Yes Non- Participant N/ANot IncludedNot includedN/A LAT version of TAKS* YesIf participant If in the Accountability subset If standard is met or if projected to meet standard by TPM

21 21 Assessments used in AYP (cont.) * Students in their First Year in U.S. Schools are counted as participants, but excluded from the performance calculation Mathematics Assessments Participation 95% Standard Performance (Accountability Subset) 75% Standard Total Students Number Participating Number Tested Met Standard or TPM/Growth TAKSYesIf participant If in the Accountability subset If standard is met or if projected to meet standard by TPM TAKS (Accommodated) YesIf participant If in the Accountability subset If standard is met or if projected to meet standard by TPM TAKS-M / LAT TAKS-M * YesIf participant If in the Accountability subset If standard is met or if projected to meet standard by TPM (subject to 2% cap) TAKS-AltYesIf participant If in the Accountability subset If standard is met or if on track to meet standard by growth (subject to 1% cap) LAT version of TAKS* YesIf participant If in the Accountability subset If standard is met or if projected to meet standard by TPM

22 Texas AYP Workbook 22 On November 15, 2010, the Title I Committee of Practitioners (COP) reviewed the recommended changes to the 2011 AYP Workbook. TEA submitted the amendment requests in December, The letter of request for proposed changes to the 2011 and 2012 Texas AYP Workbook may be viewed at

23 Texas AYP Workbook Requested Amendments to 2011 AYP Phase-in for the TAKS–M projection equations (TPM) TPM projections are expected to be reported for TAKS–M reading and mathematics tests in school year for grades 3 and 6. The 2011 Federal Cap process will remain the same as 2010 AYP, with the addition of the TAKS-M TPM for grades 3 and 6. Graduation Rate Annual Target Request to hold the 2010 graduation rate targets constant for 2011 and 2012 AYP, since student group evaluations are required beginning in 2012.

24 Texas AYP Workbook Requested Amendments for 2012 AYP and Beyond – Carry forward 2011 AYP status for all campuses and districts and maintain School Improvement Program (SIP) intervention stages. – TEA will submit a larger proposal for AYP determinations for 2013 and beyond under the new STAAR assessment program.

25 25 AYP Transition Plan 2012 & Beyond Considerations for AYP If needed, alternatives for reporting 2012 AYP results, including proposed timelines will be provided in future amendment requests. Graduation Rate targets for 2012 are applied to every student group. Consideration for the use of end-of-course assessments in all grades on secondary campuses for 2013 AYP. Student graduation requirements will include end-of-course testing. AYP performance targets will need to be set under the new STAAR assessment program.

26 AYP Transition Plan 2012 & Beyond (cont.) 26 November 2010 Title I Committee of Practitioners (COP) review of proposed Texas AYP Workbook amendments for 2011 and 2012 AYP Transition Plan Spring 2011 US Department of Education (USDE) approval of 2011 Texas AYP Workbook and 2012 AYP Transition Plan 2011 accountability advisory group meeting Summer Preliminary AYP/SIP results Fall and beyond accountability advisory group meeting Highlights of the AYP Accountability Development Timeline

27 AYP Transition Plan 2012 & Beyond (cont.) 27 November/ December AYP final results Spring and beyond accountability advisory group meetings Summer 2012Implement USDE approved 2012 AYP/SIP status results September/ October 2012 Title I COP review of AYP Workbook Proposal for 2013 and Beyond Submit AYP Texas Workbook Proposal for 2013 and beyond to USDE (excluding new annual performance targets) AYP Timeline (cont.)

28 AYP Transition Plan 2012 & Beyond (cont.) 28 January 2013 Title I COP reviews AYP reading/ELA and mathematics annual performance targets Submit AYP annual performance targets to USDE Spring 2013 Final state accountability recommendations USDE approval of STAAR assessment program and 2013 Texas AYP Workbook Summer AYP Guide Release 2013 AYP preliminary results AYP Timeline (cont.)

29 29 AYP Transition Plan 2012 & Beyond (cont.) Review of HB 3 Transition Plan for 2012 and beyond House Bill 3 Transition Plan was released on December 1 st and may be accessed at: AYP Accountability Development Timeline is located in Section III, Chapter 16, page 5. Additional information related to AYP may be found in: – Section II – Accountability, Chapter 10. – Section III – Federal Accountability and Federal Monitoring Requirements, Chapters 15 – 16.

30 30 AYP Transition Plan 2012 & Beyond (cont.) HB 3 Transition Plan Resources More information on HB 3 may be found at: – Curriculum website on House Bill 3 State Graduation Requirements: – Student Assessment website of the State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR) program – Coming Soon: HB 3 webpage for Accountability Topics. Look for a link from the AYP website.

31 31 Federal Accountability Resources For more information on 2010 AYP, see o 2010 AYP Guide, o 2010 AYP Appeals Guidelines, and o 2010 AYP Highlights at Frequently Asked Questions about AYP are available at Texas AYP Workbook is accessible at

32 32 Federal Accountability Resources SIP History Website Districts and campuses can view their Title I School Improvement Program (SIP) status history reports from 2003 through the present. See the AYP Guide for the appropriate year for descriptions of any of the AYP or SIP status labels shown. The SIP history reports are accessible at For more information about the School Improvement Program, please contact the School Improvement Unit in the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Program Coordination at (512)

33 Texas NCLB Report Card Texas NCLB Report Card Created to meet the federal reporting requirements, the 2010 NCLB Report Cards were released in January, 2011, and may be accessed at Contact the Performance Reporting Division at (512) for information on the performance results. For information on the distribution requirements of the NCLB School Report Card, please contact the Division of NCLB Program Coordination at (512)

34 34 Federal Accountability Resources U.S. Department of Education information is available at TEA Security Environment (TEASE) Accountability Website access forms are available at: Contact the Division of Performance Reporting by at or phone at (512)


Download ppt "Federal Accountability AYP Update Accountability TETN February 17, 2011 Shannon Housson and Ester Regalado TEA, Performance Reporting Division."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google