Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

1 2006 AYP Update Performance Reporting Division Texas Education Agency ESC Title I Meeting September 18, 2006.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "1 2006 AYP Update Performance Reporting Division Texas Education Agency ESC Title I Meeting September 18, 2006."— Presentation transcript:

1 AYP Update Performance Reporting Division Texas Education Agency ESC Title I Meeting September 18, 2006

2 2 Overview of Session 2006 AYP Results AYP Appeals and Exceptions 2007 Assessments and AYP Overview of AYP Process 2006 AYP Process Plan for 2007 AYP Process

3 AYP Results 87% of districts and 81% of campuses met AYP in Title I School Improvement for the school year includes 60 districts and 291 campuses

4 AYP Results Seven districts and 22 campuses were Not Evaluated under the Hurricane Rita Provision Only two campuses failed participation due to the Displaced Student group. USDE denied altering the AYP status or School Improvement Requirements for these campuses

5 AYP District Results AYP Results 2006 CountPercent Did Not Meet AYP Missed due to the 3% Federal Cap8859.8% Missed due to Cap and Other Reasons32.0% Reasons other than 3% Cap5738.5% Performance Only22 Participation Only6 Other Measure Only9 Combination of Measures20 Total Missed AYP %

6 AYP Campus Results AYP Results 2006 CountPercent Did Not Meet AYP Missed due to the 3% Federal Cap % Missed due to Cap and Other Reasons416.6% Reasons other than 3% Cap % Performance Only223 Participation Only31 Other Measure Only35 Combination of Measures79 Total Missed AYP %

7 7 AYP Appeals September 20: Appeals deadline (must be postmarked by this date) Mid-December: Districts will receive their appeal decision notification letters and TEA will release final 2006 results updated with the results of appeals.

8 8 Overview of AYP Appeals Process a. General Considerations b. Special Circumstance Appeals c. Other Circumstance Exceptions

9 9 General Appeals Appeals are not a data correction opportunity. Appeals are not considered for areas where a district/campus met AYP or was Not Evaluated. Appeals are considered for areas where AYP was missed, even if the result would mean the district/campus still misses AYP overall.

10 10 Special Circumstance Appeals Hurricane Katrina/Rita Indicator Coding Districts impacted by Hurricane Rita but not eligible for the Hurricane Rita Provision Districts with students served by Regional Day School Programs for the Deaf Title I Targeted Assistance Campuses Inclusion of Grades 9 and 11 TAKS Districts Annexed by Order of the Commissioner

11 11 Appeals based on Regional Day School Programs for the Deaf Students were not identified as automatic exceptions Districts do provide educational services for students with auditory impairments and possibly other disabilities Appeals evaluated based on the PEIMS student disability and instructional arrangement Student identifying information must be provided

12 12 Other Circumstance Exceptions Texas did not exceed the 3% cap on proficient results even with all exceptions Other circumstance exceptions will be considered Submitted as a regular appeal by 9/20/06 Refer to 2005 Exceptions Guidelines

13 13 AYP Exceptions to the Cap Federal 3% cap is extended by the Count or Number of Exceptions Total Cap applied to eligible districts: Federal 3% cap + Total Exceptions

14 14 Total Exceptions Identified Applicable to school districts registered through RF Tracker Only students evaluated within the federal cap in AYP Of these, students identified in PEIMS as receiving services in a Residential Treatment Facility Total Count of students extends the cap

15 Assessments and AYP TAKS-I Not offered in AYP subjects and grade levels TAKS-Alt Field test results included as participants, but counted as non-proficient (failing) LDAA Not counted as participants

16 16 PARTICIPATION: TOTAL STUDENTS PARTICIPATION: NUMBER PARTICIPATING PERFORMANCE: NUMBER TESTED PERFORMANCE: MET STANDARD – without CAP PERFORMANCE: MET STANDARD – CAP APPLIED Overview of AYP Process

17 17 Overview of AYP Process PARTICIPATION: TOTAL STUDENTS Students Enrolled on the Day of Testing (Denominator) PARTICIPATION: NUMBER PARTICIPATING Students Tested, both scored and not scored (Numerator) Not Included Absent Not Tested (blank document)

18 18 Overview of AYP Process PARTICIPATION: NUMBER PARTICIPATING Students Tested, both scored and not scored (Numerator) PERFORMANCE: NUMBER TESTED Scored, valid results (Denominator) Not Included Mobile Students Tested but not scored Absent Not tested (blank document)

19 19 Overview of AYP Process PERFORMANCE: NUMBER TESTED Scored, valid results (Denominator) PERFORMANCE: MET STANDARD Proficient Results for all students (Numerator of Source Data Table) Not Included Not Proficient (fail) Mobile Students Tested but not scored Absent Not tested (blank document)

20 20 PERFORMANCE: MET STANDARD Proficient Results for all students meeting the assessment standard PERFORMANCE: MET STANDARD – CAP APPLIED Proficient Results of 3% of District total number of Students Enrolled on the Day of Testing Overview of AYP Process Not Included Proficient Results from Alternative Assessments that Exceed the Cap

21 AYP Process PARTICIPATION: TOTAL STUDENTS 2006: LDAA Included PARTICIPATION: NUMBER PARTICIPATING 2006: LDAA Included Not Included Absent Not Tested (blank document)

22 AYP Process PARTICIPATION: NUMBER PARTICIPATING 2006: LDAA Included PERFORMANCE: NUMBER TESTED 2006: LDAA Included Not Included Mobile Students Tested but not scored Absent Not tested (blank document)

23 AYP Process PERFORMANCE: NUMBER TESTED 2006: LDAA Included PERFORMANCE: MET STANDARD 2006: LDAA Included when Standard Met Not Included Not Proficient (fail) Mobile Students Tested but not scored Absent Not tested (blank document)

24 AYP Process PERFORMANCE: MET STANDARD 2006: LDAA Included when Standard Met PERFORMANCE: MET STANDARD – CAP APPLIED 2006: LDAA Included if within Cap Not Included Proficient Results that Exceed Cap from SDAA Below Grade Level LDAA

25 25 Plan for 2007 AYP Process PARTICIPATION: TOTAL STUDENTS 2007: LDAA & TAKS ALT Included PARTICIPATION: NUMBER PARTICIPATING 2007: TAKS ALT Included Not Included 2007: LDAA Absent Not Tested (blank document)

26 26 Plan for 2007 AYP Process PARTICIPATION: NUMBER PARTICIPATING 2007: LDAA Not Included TAKS ALT Included PERFORMANCE: NUMBER TESTED 2007: LDAA Not Included TAKS ALT Included Not Included Mobile Students Tested but not scored Absent Not tested (blank document)

27 27 PERFORMANCE: NUMBER TESTED 2007: LDAA Not Included TAKS ALT Included PERFORMANCE: MET STANDARD Plan for 2007 AYP Process Not Included 2007: TAKS ALT Not Proficient Not Proficient (fail) Mobile Students Tested but not scored Absent Not tested (blank document)

28 28 Plan for 2007 AYP Process PERFORMANCE: MET STANDARD 2007: TAKS Alt Not Included since results are Not Proficient PERFORMANCE: MET STANDARD – CAP APPLIED Not Included 2007 Proficient Results that Exceed Cap from SDAA Below Grade Level

29 29 AYP Resources AYP Guide AYP Information Packet on TEASE 2006 Texas Consolidated State Application Workbook August 22, 2006: August TETN Accountability Presentation (side 14 – 16) April 12, 2006: ACET Presentation on Federal AYP process (slide 8)

30 30 AYP Contact Information TEA Division of Performance Reporting Web Phone (512)


Download ppt "1 2006 AYP Update Performance Reporting Division Texas Education Agency ESC Title I Meeting September 18, 2006."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google