Presentation on theme: "1 Performance indicators, targets, steering Technical Interchange meeting Toulouse, 15-17 May 2002 Xavier FRON Head Performance Review Unit."— Presentation transcript:
1 Performance indicators, targets, steering Technical Interchange meeting Toulouse, 15-17 May 2002 Xavier FRON Head Performance Review Unit
2 ECAC institutional strategy A Performance oriented strategy PRC role –Measure performance (KPI) Safety, delays, cost –Propose performance targets –Recommendations to meet targets
3 European IFR traffic demand In 10 years Flights: +60% (4.8%p.a.) Distance: +80% (6% p.a.) In 2001 Flights: -0.6% Distance: +0.2%
4 Key Performance Areas Cost - Effectivenes s Total unit costs do not increase (routes charges + delays) Capacity - Delay Meet traffic demand Safety Total numbers of incidents, accidents capped ATM 2000+
5 ATM 2000+ target set But no reliable performance indicator Safety target Actual risk? Cannot assess if target being met
21 ECAC cost target (qualitative) t Efficiency frontier Frontier shift Catch up Present trend Desirable trend Unit cost
22 ANSP cost-effectiveness 2001 route charges: 4800 million Euro –Is this appropriate? Substantial variance in unit rates Min=21, Max=114 Euro –Is this justified? Unit costs (per km) rising in real terms –ATM system less cost-effective ? –Indication of investment for future capacity ?
25 Benchmarking Unit cost model takes weighted density and climb/descent into account
26 Cost-effectiveness KPI Working Paper (www.eurocontrol.int/prc) Inputs(Resources) Outputs Controlled traffic Capacity Efficiency of allocation Cost- effectivenes s Cost / controlled flight hours Productive efficiency ATM costs / sectors hours open Flight hours controlled / ATCO
27 Information disclosure An obligation to disclose information about monopoly ATM activities Separation of accounts ATM and non-ATM En-route from other ATM Yearly disclosure of information Contextual Financial Operational Forward-looking Independently Audited
28 Information disclosure Status Developed with 17 ANSPs in 2001 Cost-effectiveness analysis framework (KPIs) Specification (V2) has been adopted 2000 data submitted and analysed (voluntary basis) 2001 data due by 15 July 2002
29 European ATM performance summary Safety No reliable safety indicator Capacity ATFM Delay costs in 2001: 1.1-1.7 billion Improvement anticipated in 2002 Be prepared for future traffic growth Cost effectiveness En-route + terminal charges ~ 6.2 billion Unit cost: 70% above US Potential net savings ~ 1-2 billion
30 Soft regulation Safety –European safety indicator needed Capacity/costs –ECAC target –Publication by ANSPs of own performance targets, accountability, autonomy, incentives –Consolidation by EUROCONTROL –Loop in case of divergence Hard regulation or alternative if insufficient
31 Success test for the ECAC Institutional strategy t Cost Risk ATFM delay
Your consent to our cookies if you continue to use this website.