Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

CDA developed based on DFID model - 2001 Pilot phase (October 2001- end of 2002): assessing how appropriate and helpful conflict analysis might be in leading.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "CDA developed based on DFID model - 2001 Pilot phase (October 2001- end of 2002): assessing how appropriate and helpful conflict analysis might be in leading."— Presentation transcript:

1 CDA developed based on DFID model - 2001 Pilot phase (October 2001- end of 2002): assessing how appropriate and helpful conflict analysis might be in leading to more effective development strategies and programming for UNDP Country Offices  Initial strategic conflict assessments (Guatemala, Nepal, Nigeria, Tajikistan and Guinea-Bissau) Testing phase (2003): CPR Practice workshops in Sarajevo/Manila; workshops in New York and Geneva, with UNDP staff and Framework Team members

2 Possible Applications of the CDA Consensus building on conflict prevention within UNDP/UNCT : Yemen Joint Strategic Analysis : Nigeria; Solomon Islands CCA/UNDAF: Philippines; UNDG Guidance note on the integration of conflict prevention into CCA/UNDAF NHDR: Colombia; HDRO Draft Guidance note on the integration of conflict prevention into NHDR

3 Possible applications of the CDA PRSP: conflict sensitized CCA as the UN contribution to the process; World Bank project “PRSP in conflict situations”. Needs assessment: Haiti/Sudan; WB/UN Guidelines on post conflict needs assessment Program Design and Review: Nepal, Tajikistan; Bougainville

4  Post-conflict environment  Development links to conflict, if any, not fully understood  New program relevant to many areas; biggest UNDP program in the country Bougainville Community and Planning Support Program (Governance portfolio) Why a Project-level CDA in Bougainville?

5 Process Assessed evaluation and formulation Examined lessons learned in past phases and other relevant programs Consulted with donors, Government and civil society Sought data to support conclusions – ongoing.

6 BPCS Implementation Guidelines  Planning and Coordination  Transparency and Communications  Speed, timing and flexibility  Peace Dividends and Incentives  Geographic coverage and who benefits including the No-go zone Approach  Gender-based Programming and Partner Groups  Capacity development, Ownership and Use of Local Expertise

7 Some key challenges Data collection and gathering; Sensitivity around the issue of conflict prevention; In-country capacity; Sustained process of conflict analysis (not just a snapshot) and ongoing linkages throughout the programming cycle

8 Emerging Lessons Learnt Need to link conflict analysis with specific planning frameworks and programming cycles. Importance of capacity development in order to ensure sustainable impact of the exercise.

9 Lessons Importance of the process, over the methodological approach. Customisation of the approach according to specific local contexts, needs, etc. Sensitivity around the issue of conflict prevention/conflict analysis, especially in pre- conflict settings. Related challenges of data collection, inclusiveness and participation in some conflict prone and affected countries.


Download ppt "CDA developed based on DFID model - 2001 Pilot phase (October 2001- end of 2002): assessing how appropriate and helpful conflict analysis might be in leading."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google