Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

August 28, 2015 Long Island Independent and Peer Evaluation: Making the Work Matter.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "August 28, 2015 Long Island Independent and Peer Evaluation: Making the Work Matter."— Presentation transcript:

1 August 28, 2015 Long Island Independent and Peer Evaluation: Making the Work Matter

2 Today’s Plan Making the Work Matter The NYS Teaching and Leadership Standards Inter-rater Reliability Evidenced based observations Application and use of rubrics

3 A Look to the Future

4 Surprised meConcerned me Implications for what we do What needs to be a amplified to your staff? 2028

5 5

6 Bolman and Deal’s Four Frames

7 StructuralHuman Resource Political Symbolic The Changes

8

9 9 APPR Growth Scores Common Core Budget Opt Out Cuomo SLO’s

10 10

11 11

12 12

13 13

14 CULTURECULTURE

15 15 What can you do to quiet the noise? What can you do to keep the focus on student learning? How will you change what you say and do? How will you change your culture?

16

17 It’s all about attitude…

18 Peer and Outside Evaluator

19 Welcome to APPR! Which blob best represents you?

20 New York State Teaching Standards and Leadership Standards Evidence-based observation Application and use of Student Growth Percentile and VA Growth Model data Application and use of the State-approved teacher or principal rubrics Application and use of any assessment tools used to evaluate teachers and principals Application and use of State-approved locally selected measures of student achievement Use of the Statewide Instructional Reporting System Scoring methodology used to evaluate teachers and principals Specific considerations in evaluating teachers and principals of ELLs and students with disabilities Lead Evaluator Training

21 The observer is NOT the evaluator. The RUBRIC is the evaluator. The observer COLLECTS EVIDENCE. Evidence Based Observation

22 Specific Objective Data, Data, Data Evidence Based Observation

23 Description with Judgment “The teacher read from the book, The Giver, which was not at the appropriate level for the class.” “There was too much time on discussion, not enough time on individual work.” “The students conducted a sophisticated lab experiment.”

24 Specificity of Evidence “Students followed directions in the text to make circuit boards.” What data might make this more specific?

25 Objectivity/Specificity Matrix Specific and JudgmentalGeneral and Judgmental Specific and DescriptiveGeneral and Descriptive Judgmental Objectivity Descriptive Specific Specificity General Adapted from Learning Walkthrough Guide, MA Dept. of Elementary & Secondary Education.

26 Objectivity/Specificity Matrix Specific and Judgmental “The teacher read from the book, The Giver, which was not at the appropriate level for the class.” General and Judgmental “There was too much time on discussion, not enough time on individual work.” Specific and Descriptive “Student 1 asked student 2: ‘What are we supposed to write down?’ Student 2 said, ‘I don’t know.’” General and Descriptive “Students followed directions in the text to make circuit boards.” Judgmental Objectivity Descriptive Adapted from Learning Walkthrough Guide, MA Dept. of Elementary & Secondary Education. Specific Specificity General

27 Opportunity for Practice # EVIDENCE ERROR AMENDED EX: Teacher circulates Not specific Teacher moved to the back of the room and spoke to four students. 1. Teacher responded to off-task behavior respectfully

28 Mini-Observation

29 Your Job Write specific and descriptive notes about what you see in the following classroom video, particularly things that align with Standards III, IV, and V.1 OR Domains 2 and 3.

30 Observation Classroom 1: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZFdeCkjwACQ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZFdeCkjwACQ Classroom 2: DVD

31 Tuning our Observations Reread your notes from this first classroom observation. Choose three pieces of data and write a correlating evidence statement for each one on three separate sticky notes. Share with a neighbor. Help each other tune the data as necessary.

32 StandardEvidence Statement III.1 III.2 Evidence Statements

33 Cognitive Engagement Constructivism 21st Century Skills Rubric Tenets

34 Creativity and Innovation Critical Thinking and Problem Solving Communication and Collaboration Meet the 21 st Century Skills

35 Information Literacy Media Literacy ICT (Information, Communications, and Technology) Literacy Meet the 21 st Century Skills

36 Flexibility and Adaptability Initiative and Self Direction Social and Cross-Cultural Skills Productivity and Accountability Leadership and Responsibility Meet the 21 st Century Skills

37 I doModeling Direct Instruction We doGuided practice You do together Collaboration You doIndependent Practice Gradual Release of Responsibility and the Rubrics

38 The Gradual Release of Responsibility: 1.I DO 2.WE DO 3.YOU DO TOGETHER 4.YOU DO Measuring Student Autonomy

39 Who bares the cognitive burden? The Rubrics Ask:

40 Use your pen or highlighter to mark words or concepts that delineate between the performance levels. Rubric Analysis

41 Using your evidence statements and notes, apply the rubric to your observation evidence. Rate the videos

42 Where does the learning experience fall on the rubric? Evaluate the Learning

43 Specific and Objective Student Centered Autonomy Opportunity for Practice of 21 st Century Skills Last Thoughts

44

45

46

47 New York State Standards Jigsaw Activity Groups of 4 #1 Read Knowledge of Content and Instructional Planning #2 Read Instructional Practice and Learning Environment #3 Read Assessment for Student Learning, Professional Responsibilities and Collaboration, and Professional Growth #4 Read Standards for Building and District Leaders

48 Surprised mePleased me Concerned me Needs to be amplified NYS Standards

49 Inter-rater Reliability

50

51 Perspective Matters

52 Inter-rater Reliability Requires: ▫ Consistent definition of good teaching ▫ A shared understanding of the definition ▫ Skilled evaluators (Danielson)

53 Inter-rater Reliability Discuss and reach consensus: ▫ What constitutes great student engagement? ▫ What does quality assessment look like in a lesson? ▫ What makes for strong questioning and discussion prompts?

54 Inter-rater Reliability Process: ▫ Work on the consistent definition as a school/district, using the rubric ▫ Observe and rate classroom videos together ▫ Use “instructional rounds”, identifying two or three areas only ▫ Conduct joint observations and compare findings

55 Wrapping it up Need to rememberMust share with others Want to learn more What else? Our Two Days

56


Download ppt "August 28, 2015 Long Island Independent and Peer Evaluation: Making the Work Matter."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google