Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

PREDICTING THE 2013 SAINT LOUIS CITY HOMICIDE RATE SPENCER SCHNEIDENBACH SHAILESH LANJEWAR XUN ZHOU BEN HOLTMAN.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "PREDICTING THE 2013 SAINT LOUIS CITY HOMICIDE RATE SPENCER SCHNEIDENBACH SHAILESH LANJEWAR XUN ZHOU BEN HOLTMAN."— Presentation transcript:

1 PREDICTING THE 2013 SAINT LOUIS CITY HOMICIDE RATE SPENCER SCHNEIDENBACH SHAILESH LANJEWAR XUN ZHOU BEN HOLTMAN

2 BACKGROUND Annual homicide rates for 157 large US cities Analyzed for 30 years – 1976 to 2005 Factors Resource deprivation/concentrated poverty Higher income inequality Higher percentage of divorced adult male population Higher unemployment rates Study in 30 nations Significant association between poverty and homicide Sources: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0049089X10001882 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0049089X10001882 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0049089X12002554

3 DIVERSITY Characteristics of neighborhoods Very significant in predicting homicide Conclusion: immigrant concentration unrelated or inversely related to homicide language diversity consistently linked to lower homicide 15 years of data (1980-1994) St. Louis Homicide rate related to neighborhood characteristics Patterns differ according to homicide subtypes – general altercation, felony and domestic Sources: http://hsx.sagepub.com/content/13/3/242.shorthttp://hsx.sagepub.com/content/13/3/242.short http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1533-8525.2003.tb00536.x/abstract

4 NATIONAL GANG TRENDS Source: FBI 2011 National Gang Threat Assessment – Emerging Trends

5 MISSOURI GANG TRENDS Source: FBI 2011 National Gang Threat Assessment – Emerging Trends

6 MISSOURI GANG TRENDS  Seems to be lower than other states with only 0-2 members per 1000 people  Rise in gang “promotional teams”  Increased gang use of social media directed towards youth  Presence small as it may be of 490 gangs according to the FBI Gang Threat Assessment Source: FBI 2011 National Gang Threat Assessment – Emerging Trends

7

8 DATA SELECTION PRINCIPLE Timeliness - Annually? Quarterly? Monthly? Sufficiency - Sample size – St Louis City, at least 5 years, the factors can have potential impact on criminal Level of detail or aggregation - Amount for reported criminal annually, criminal ratio distribute by district and possible influence factors such as poverty level, education attainment, population, Income etc Understandability - Readable for the crime data. Freedom from bias - How to avoid that? Keep it simple Decision relevance - How to determine the boundary? Geographical? How many factors are relevant to the criminal occurs geographically?

9 DATA SELECTION PRINCIPLE Comparability - Each city is individual case for analytic, avoid comparing the other cites’ data and cut off the data which influenced by abnormal factors. Reliability - We can not control, however there may be un-reported and un- detected crime which can influence the analysis Redundancy - Mulit-resources? Cost efficiency - Costs concern update data annually Quantifiability - Use Ratio level data Appropriateness of format - Which is the appropriate way to demonstrate

10 DIMENSIONALITY OF MODELS Representation -Reported crime Time Dimension -How much of the activity of decision environment is being considered Linearity of the Relationship -Determine if categorized data are linear or nonlinear Deterministic Versus Stochastic -Linear regression, Stochastic modeling Descriptive Versus Normative - Descriptive - used for prediction

11 DIMENSIONALITY OF MODELS Causality versus correlation -How to determine? - use criminal distribution graph and the other possible factor which has the positive or negative relate on them Methodology Dimension -Complete enumeration, algorithmic, heuristic simulations and analytical -Complete enumeration – large sample amounts required -Algorithmic – extremeness' value method -Heuristic - if math would not help -Simulation – external influence? Hard to identify -Analytical – speared parts for the whole process

12 MODELS WE CONSIDERED  Linear regression  Model based on Census, American Community Survey data  Predict crime based on population factors -Saint Louis Police Department Neighborhood Statistics -U.S. Census American Fact Finder Statistics -American Community Survey -Poverty Level -Educational Attainment -Lack of Core Family Stability Single Parent Families – Mothers with no husband present -Income -Race

13 MODELS WE CONSIDERED (CONT)  Linear Regression  Census data  Research only occurs once a decade  Hard to measure trends for predictions  American Community Survey  Broken down at the macro level (entire city)  Can’t measure by neighborhood, district  Conclusion:  Still useful for identifying problem areas inside a city  Best for a one-time “snapshot” to see what correlations exist and attack those problems  Largely outside the scope of what the SLMPD does

14 MODELS WE CONSIDERED (CONT)  Rolling average  Model based on past homicides  Weighs more recent data higher than other data  Pros  Data is easily accessible and accurate  Model is simple and pretty accurate  Cons  Does not predict big, one time events  Model data varies the more homicides are committed

15 MODELS WE CONSIDERED (CONT)  Rolling average  District vs. neighborhood  SLMPD uses districts  Most crime seems to be concentrated in several large areas  Districts it is  Quarters, months, years?  Years – too macro  Months – too micro – data is too wildly distributed  Measuring by quarters provides a nice balance between micro vs. macro and data accuracy

16 DECISION POINT  Rolling average it is  Regression model can’t be trended  Best model based on all available data

17 EXAMPLE MODEL  Rolling average it is  Best model based on all available data  Our model:  Prediction based on last 4 quarters  Last quarter: weighted by 0.4  2 nd last: 0.4  3 rd last: 0.1  4 th last: 0.1

18 MEASURING THE MODEL

19 OUR PREDICTIONS

20 CONCLUSION  Prediction is difficult

21 QUESTIONS?

22 SOURCES FBI 2011 National Gang Threat Assessment – Emerging Trends. http://www.fbi.gov/stats- services/publications/2011-national-gang-threat-assessmenthttp://www.fbi.gov/stats- services/publications/2011-national-gang-threat-assessment Saint Louis Police Department Statistics - http://www.slmpd.org/Crimereports.shtmlhttp://www.slmpd.org/Crimereports.shtml American Fact Finder - http://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/nav/jsf/pages/guided_search.xhtmlhttp://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/nav/jsf/pages/guided_search.xhtml Saint Louis Homicide Map - http://blogs.riverfronttimes.com/dailyrft/2013/01/st_louis_city_homicide_map_nextstl.php


Download ppt "PREDICTING THE 2013 SAINT LOUIS CITY HOMICIDE RATE SPENCER SCHNEIDENBACH SHAILESH LANJEWAR XUN ZHOU BEN HOLTMAN."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google