1. Re-use of PSI Data Protection Issues Cécile de Terwangne Professor at the Law Faculty, Research Director at CRIDS University of Namur (Belgium) 2 nd LAPSI Public Conference 23 January 2012, Brussels

2. Relations re-use & data protection Art. 1, § 4, PSI directive 2003/98 « This Directive leaves intact and in no way affects the level of protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data under the provisions of Community and national law, and in particular does not alter the obligations and rights set out in Directive 95/46/EC. » respect data prot. rules when re-use of PSI

3. Right to data protection is derived from but not assimilated to right to privacy: - art. 7 and 8 EU Charter Fund. Rights - art. 8 ECHR not to be restricted to confidentiality

4. 4 When does data protection apply? Which data? Personal data = any information related to an identified or identifiable natural person not necessarily confidential data even professional data commercial data published data When data is processed by automatic means or is part of a filing system Personal data sets; isolated personal data

5. 5 Examples possibly concerned by re-use: Commercial registers Vehicles registration Case law data bases Institutional web sites presenting members, agenda, etc. Socio-economic data Land register European Patent Office

6. Data Protection principles Fair processing of personal data Transparency Purpose principle: for which purposes? only data relevant in relation to the purposes Proportionality principle for the data (non excessive) for the processing (6 hypotheses) Data quality: data accurate and, where necessary, kept up to date Limited time of storage

7. Data Protection principles Respect of the data subjects rights: access rectification, erasure right to object Information to data subjects Security measures Notification to authority

8. Data protection legislation is not a prohibition legislation Except for sensitive data: personal data revealing racial or ethnic origin, political opinions, religious or philosophical beliefs, trade-union membership, and the processing of data concerning health or sex life And for judicial data: data relating to offences, criminal convictions or security measures

9. 9 Data Protection Principles Data protection principles having particuliar impact on PSI re-use: Purpose principle Proportionality principle Transparency principle

10. 10 Purpose Principle Data processed for specified, explicit and legitimate purposes… and data not processed in a way incompatible with the purposes of collection (compatible = within data subjects reasonable expectations / foreseen by law)

11. Re-use for a specified purpose From the point of view of the public sector entity From the point of view of the re-user Purpose Principle

12. Re-use for incompatible purposes: Dir. 95/46: strict reading: not allowed (except historical, statistical, scientific research purposes) soft reading: OK with data subjects consent or NSauthority prior authorisation Regulation proposal: OK if consent necessary for a contract legal obligation data subjects vital interest task in the public interest Purpose Principle

13. consent Freely given, informed, specific (art. 2, h, Dir. 95/46) But binary (whereas nuances desirable linked to purposes/contexts) [Retractable? (review dir. 95/46: « The data subject shall have the right to withdraw his or her consent at any time. The withdrawal of consent shall not affect the lawfulness of processing based on consent before its withdrawal » )]

14. To sum up: Re-use allowed if compatible purposes historical, statistical or scientific research purposes data subjects consent NSA prior autorisation [processing is necessary for the performance of a task carried out in the public interest] Or else anonymise. ! Sensitive and judicial data Purpose Principle

15. 15 Only relevant data in relation to the purposes of processing (re-use) Purpose Principle

16. 16 Re-use for legitimate purposes (balancing test) Grounds to legitimate re-use: Data subjects consent (ex.: planning permissions) Re-use provided for by law (balance done in advance) Interest of re-use overriding data subjects rights and interests (ex.: re-use of data from official websites in the newspaper or in the journal of a non- profit-making association) Proportionality Principle

17. Only non excessive data Proportionality Principle

18. Transparency Principle Duty to inform data subjects on: The controller The purposes of re-use The data The recipients The existence of rights of access, to rectify, to object Possible exemptions

19. Thank you for your attention Cécile de Terwangne 19