Presentation on theme: "European Quality Assurance in Higher Education after the London ministerial meeting: moving towards 2010 (and beyond) Sofia, 9 November 2007 Emmi."— Presentation transcript:
1European Quality Assurance in Higher Education after the London ministerial meeting: moving towards 2010 (and beyond) Sofia, 9 November Emmi Helle Secretary General ENQA
2ENQAnetwork in 2000; association in 2004umbrella NGO for European QA agencies35 Full members, 10 Candidate membersassociates and affiliates since 2006: 12+2structure: Board, General Assembly, Secretariatfrom Helsinki to Brussels in 2008external reviews of ENQA member agencies by 2010co-operation within E4 (EUA, ESU, EURASHE)
3European standards and guidelines (ESG) drafted by ENQA in consultation with EUA, EURASHE and ESIBapproved by the Bologna ministerial conference in Bergen in 2005consist ofESG for internal QA within HEIs (Part 1)ESG for the external QA of higher education (Part 2)ESG for external QA agencies (Part 3)
4London Communiqué: extracts on QA (1) […ESG] have been a powerful driver of change inrelation to QA. All countries have started toimplement them and some have made substantialprogress. External QA in particular is much betterdeveloped than before […] student involvement atall levels has increased […] Since the mainresponsibility for quality lies with HEIs, theyshould continue to develop their systems of QA. Weacknowledge the progress made with regard tomutual recognition of accreditation and qualityassurance decisions, and encourage continuedinternational cooperation amongst QA agencies.
5London Communiqué: extracts on QA (2) The first European Quality AssuranceForum, jointly organised by EUA, ENQA,EURASHE and ESU/ESIB (the E4 Group) in2006 provided an opportunity to discussEuropean developments in QA. Weencourage the four organisations tocontinue to organise European QA Foraon an annual basis, to facilitate thesharing of good practice and ensure thatquality in the EHEA continues to improve.
6London Communiqué: extracts on QA (3) We thank the E4 Group for responding to our request to furtherdevelop the practicalities of setting up a Register ofEuropean Higher Education Quality Assurance Agencies.The purpose […] is […] open access to objective informationabout trustworthy QA agencies that are working in line withthe ESG. It will therefore enhance confidence in highereducation […] and facilitate the mutual recognition of QAand accreditation decisions. We welcome the establishment of aregister by the E4 group […] The register will be voluntary,self-financing, independent and transparent. Applicationsfor inclusion on the register should be evaluated on the basis ofsubstantial compliance with the ESG, evidenced through anindependent review process endorsed by nationalauthorities […] We ask the E4 group to report progress to usregularly through BFUG, and to ensure that after two years ofoperation, the register is evaluated externally […]
7The Register – progress to date after the ministerial endorsement, a Register working group set up by E4Project Manager appointed, with EC fundingname and acronym: European Quality Assurance Register in Higher Education, EQARwebsite under construction, will be launched in December 2007:will be founded as an association under Belgian Law -> statutes and structure need to conform with that lawfounding GA meeting on 4 March 2008envisaged first applications in June 2008
8EQAR in practise (1) Register Committee 11 members in their individual capacity5 government observersAppeals Committee3 membersApproval based on nominationsElectionGeneral AssemblyFounding Members E4 GroupSocial Partners BE and EIGovernmental Members EHEA Governments, CoE, CEPESExecutive Board: 4 members (elected on proposal of the E4)Secretariat: Director (1 FTE) + Administrative assistant (0.5 FTE)
9EQAR in practise (2): membership non-governmental members:founding members (the E4 organisations)social partner members (EI, BE)governmental membersall parties to the European Cultural Conventionintergovernmental organisations that are consultative members of the BFUG (CoE, UNESCO-CEPES)members not to be confused with the agencies listed in the Registermembers pay annual membership fees, agencies pay fees of application and annual fees (to stay listed)
11EQAR in practise (4)promotes student mobility by providing a basis for the increase of trust among the HEIs;reduces opportunities for “accreditation mills” to gain credibility;provides a basis for governments to authorise HEIs to choose any agency from the Register, if that is compatible with national arrangements;provides a means for the HEIs to choose between different agencies, if that is compatible with national arrangements;serves as an instrument to improve the quality of the quality assurance agencies and to promote mutual trust among them.
12EQAR in practise (5) – how will it look like? will be an easily accessible, publicly available, web-based information tool consisting in a list of QA agencies operating in Europeavailable atcontains basic information, such as:agency’s name and contact informationQA services provided by the agencyENQA membershipcountry where the agency is establishedcountries in which the agency operates
13Relationship between ENQA and EQAR EQAR will be an information tool on trustworthy agencies, a list on the internetwill not organise events, publish reports, share good practise or conduct (research) projectsENQA is an umbrella organisation for QA agencies, a membership organisationorganises events, publishes reports, shares good practise, conducts different (research) projectsrepresents the interests of its members in the EHEA and internationally
14Relationship between ENQA and EQAR ENQA will be a (founding) member of the EQAR associationENQA will nominate two representatives for the Register CommitteeENQA will nominate one of the four members of the Executive Board and thereby be involved in the day-to-day management of the EQAR
15Challenges related with EQAR funding and sustainable financial strategy? Self-financing?putting the ESG in practise?duplication with ENQA membership?different decisions from ENQA?complexity of structure?
16Bologna Process: priorities for 2009 mobilitysocial dimensiondata collectionemployabilityEHEA in a global contextstocktakingdegree system and employability of graduatesrecognition of degrees and study periodsimplementation of all aspects of QA in line with the ESGnational qualifications frameworks, learning outcomes and credits, lifelong learning, and the recognition of prior learning
17Bologna Process: 2010 and beyond will go on in some format: BFUG will report to the Leuven/La Neuve ministerial meeting in 2009 on the possible further development and support structurespossible reformulation of the EHEA vision?an independent assessment in 2010 of the Bologna Process
18Feedback from members at the Oslo GA – ENQA priorities for short term strengthen the internal communication within ENQA;clarify the relationship between ENQA and EQAR;create standards, supplementary to the ESG, on transnational themes such as the quality of e-learning;play a major role in the Bologna Process as an overarching “political” organisation providing frameworks for the evolution of QA agencies;continue to be open to all agencies and, as a learning organisation, enable agencies to develop continuously;develop a lead role in representing the interests of its member agencies at European and international levels.
19European quality assurance agency? European think-thank? ENQA in the futureEuropean quality assurance agency?European think-thank?inclusiveness / exclusiveness?compact association or going back to loose network?the ‘political’ role after the establishment of EQAR?the future of the ESG?wider international role for ENQA?radical rethinking of quality assurance?