1. Why harmonised reporting? Thera Edwards

2. WHAT IS HARMONISATION? Harmonisation can be considered as any activity that leads to a more integrated process and greater potential for sharing information. Any activity that makes processes easier, more efficient, more effective or easier to implement

3. HISTORY The Environmental Management Group (EMG)*in January 2001 discussed the harmonisation of national reporting and agreed to establish an Issue Management Group (IMG) – Decision 3 UNEP was invited to serve as task manager EMG – chaired by Exec Dir UNEP and includes specialised agencies, funds, programmes of the UN systems and the MEA Secretariats

4. HISTORY con’t Note prepared by the Exec. Dir. of UNEP on “Harmonisation of Information Management and Reporting for Biodiversity-related Treaties” was discussed at subsequent EMG meetings This note had a number of recommended actions

5. HISTORY con’t Several MEAs have provisions for collaboration with other conventions –CBD: Articles 5 & 24(d) –UNFCCC: Articles 7.2(l) & 8.2(e) –UNCCD: Articles 8.1 & 23(d) Framework is set for collaboration

6. HISTORY con’t– COOPERATION BETWEEN BIODIVERSITY MEAs Biodiversity* related MEAs –Joint Programmes of Work –Memoranda of Understanding –Memoranda of Cooperation –Joint scientific activities *Biodiversity MEAs CBD, CITES, CMS, WHS, Ramsar

7. RENEWED COMMITTEMENT TO HARMONISATION 2010 Biodiversity Targets not met Declines in ecosystems, species and genetic diversity Increase in protected areas, protection of threatened species IEG need for synergies between Biodiversity-related MEAs

8. IEG RECOMMENDATIONS Improved coordination among and effectiveness of MEAs –Pilot projects for improved national reporting mechanisms

9. NORDIC SYMPOSIUM 2010 Synergies in the biodiversity cluster Harmonisation of reporting Joint information management and awareness raising Capacity building, compliance, funding and review mechanisms

10. HARMONISED REPORTING INITIATIVES Ghana – Linking National Report to State of Env. process Indonesia – Identification of common modules (approach of CHART) Panama – Regional support mechanisms for national information management Seychelles – Consolidated national report for several MEAs (CHART)

11. RATIONALE FOR HARMONISED REPORTING Number of MEAs has increased, hence number of reports as well other information submissions creating a reporting burden However, reports are critical: –Help to assess progress of implementation –Contain specific information –Can lead to further study for identified issues Concerns however about information sharing/transmission –Information contained in a report to one MEA may prove of benefit to another MEA secretariat

12. REPORTING DOCUMENTS National Reports Annual Reports e.g.CITES Thematic Reports –Protected Areas –Invasive Alien Species –Genetic resources –Global Taxonomy Initiative –Forest and Mountain Ecosystems

13. CHALLENGES TO HARMONISED REPORTING Data scattered Poor Coordination within countries Low Capacity Reporting cycles different for MEAs(1-6 years) Different Terminology Differing signatory/ratification status for countries

14. BENEFITS OF HARMONISED REPORTING Time and resources better utilised Better quality of reports due to more efficient use of resources (human and otherwise) especially in resource challenged SIDS

15. HARMONISED REPORTING Coordination among national focal points Common definitions and terms Core Report with additional convention specific reports Joint reporting on specific themes

16. CONCLUSION A logical progression in the history of cooperation between MEAs Many attendant benefits; not without challenges A platform for further integration towards common goals between Biodiversity-related MEAs

17. Quick Glance at Ratification COUNTRYCBDCITESRamsarSPAW Antigua and Barbuda√√√ The Bahamas√√√ Barbados√√√√ Belize√√√√ Cuba√√√√ Dominica√√X Dominican Republic√√√√ Grenada√X√√ Guyana√√X√ Haiti√√X Jamaica√√√ St Kitts and Nevis√√X St Lucia√√√√ St Vincent and the Grenadines√√X√ Suriname√√√ Trinidad and Tobago√√√√

18. THANK YOU