Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Future Water Supply - for the Ashley Valley D. Gerard Yates Central Utah Water Conservancy District.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Future Water Supply - for the Ashley Valley D. Gerard Yates Central Utah Water Conservancy District."— Presentation transcript:

1 Future Water Supply - for the Ashley Valley D. Gerard Yates Central Utah Water Conservancy District

2 Ashley Valley Water System Overview

3 Red Fleet Reservoir 1982 operation 26,000 Acre Feet

4 Red Fleet Dam

5 Red Fleet Pump Station 1985 operational 5 pumps / 2 - 8cfs (600 hp) 3 – 16cfs (1250 hp) (5/10 mgd)

6 Uintah Water Conservancy District

7 Tyzack Pipeline and Raw Water Bypass Chocolate Rock Pump Station - T2 & T3 1.5 mgd each

8 Ashley Valley Water Treatment Plant (CUWCD)

9 2 Source Waters Ashley Springs / Red Fleet

10 Ashley Valley Water SID Treatment Plant

11 1 Direct Treatment Source 2 Ways to Exchange

12 Treatment Plant Overview Two Water Treatment Plants serve the valley Each plant has been in service for more than 25 years – delivering high quality water Each plant has experienced increased demands and challenging raw water quality Each plant has experienced production limitations during poor water quality events Changes in drinking water regulations present challenges at each plant Peak production at each plant is 6-7 MDG (CUWCD rated capacity was15 MDG – AVWSID plant rated capacity 8 MGD)

13 Ashley Valley Water Treatment Plant Process Improvement Project

14 General Plant Process Limitations QUALITY (Lack the ability to sufficiently address increasing disinfection by-product formation) QUANTITY (Lack the ability to treat degrading quality raw water ( 20 NTU for 3 hours or >30 NTU) EFFICIENCY (Short “unit filter run volumes” result in higher operating costs and solids handling challenges – long hours for plant staff)

15 Process Improvement Evaluation Evaluate if the existing direct filtration process is suitable from a regulatory perspective for both sources Evaluate the reliable plant capacity achievable with direct filtration What new processes would be required to reliably produce at the plant rated capacity? What new processes would be required to reliably meet present and future drinking water regulations

16

17 Zeta Potential Dissolved Air Flotation U.V. Pilot Plant Testing Jar Testing

18 Source Water Differences ?

19 Site Constraints - geology 17 Acres – 20 MGD – ? Expansion to 30 MGD

20 Direct or Conventional ?

21 Filters / Under drains ?

22 Solids Handling ?

23 Finished Water Storage

24 Disinfection By-Products ? Duchesne Valley – Ozone Ashley Valley – Conventional & Blending Utah Valley – Ozone & Conventional

25 Data and Process Evaluation (Decision Making)

26 Ashley Valley Plant Decisions Reliably treat 20 MGD Construct a new initial hydraulic mix and chemical feed system (lead and copper) Construct a new floc / sedimentation process (direct to conventional) Construct new deep-bed filters with full- rate filter to waste, a new underdrain system, and convert from declining rate filters to constant rate constant level

27 Ashley Valley Decisions Continued… Construct new a new “backwash” waste water clarifier Install a chlorine scrubber

28 Flocculation/Sedimentation

29 2 New Plate Settlers

30 6 Constant Level – Deep Bed Filters

31 New Flash Mix

32 New Backwash Clarifier

33 Ne w Chemical Feed System

34 New Chlorine Scrubber

35 Old Plant / New Plant 15 MGD - unreliable 20 MGD - reliable

36 Plant Results to Date The Ashley Valley Plant has been in operation for 9 months (with all Process Improvements Operational) and is meeting all goals and objectives. The plant is rated for 20 MGD One shift per day operation

37 Ashley Valley Total Plant Production Both plants peak daily average is 6.5MGD AVWSID plant = 8 MGD CUWCD plant = 20 MGD 2012 production both plants = 7365 acre feet 10 year average = > 30 percent production increase Present growth rate in 10 years the valley will need an additional 2400 acre feet of treated water.

38 Uintah County Population Growth 2000-2010 = 22.6%

39 Vernal City Water System 27% / 16%

40 Ashley Springs is a limited supply Spring highest production = poor quality

41 Red Fleet Reservoir (Brush Creek Spring) The Future Supply for the Valley 2000 Acre Feet Presently Petitioned 3300 Acre Feet – Presently Available (2400 needed within 10 years) 12,000 Acre Feet – Additional Jensen Unit Water available with addition of the Burns Bench Pump Station.

42 There is More Than One Way to Get a Drink of Water in the Ashley Valley Questions????


Download ppt "Future Water Supply - for the Ashley Valley D. Gerard Yates Central Utah Water Conservancy District."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google