We think you have liked this presentation. If you wish to download it, please recommend it to your friends in any social system. Share buttons are a little bit lower. Thank you!
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byAudrey Peterson
Modified over 3 years ago
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS © ETSI 2012. All rights reserved ETSI Seminar 2012
Legal considerations ETSI members should be aware that several legal considerations need to be taken into account while participating in the activities of ETSI. - ETSI as an association and ETSI members are subject to different national and supranational laws. - The bodies of ETSI and the ETSI members are bound by the ETSI Directives. Focus in this Seminar: I. ETSI IPR Policy II. ETSI Guidelines for Antitrust Compliance © ETSI 2012. All rights reserved
I.ETSI IPR POLICY © ETSI 2012. All rights reserved
Where do I find the ETSI IPR Policy ? The ETSI IPR Policy (Annex 6 of the ETSI Rules of Procedure) Rights and obligations of Members, Technical Body Chairmen and the ETSI Secretariat with respect to IPRs Definitions IPR Information Statement and Licensing Declaration Forms http://www.etsi.org/WebSite/document/Legal/ETSI%20IPR%20Policy%20November%202011.pdf The ETSI guide on IPRs Background/ Guidance on the interpretation of the rights and obligations deriving from the IPR Policy Explanation on the duties of Members, Technical Body Chairmen and the ETSI Secretariat with respect to IPRs Where to find information on essential IPRs Other ETSI IPR Policy matters http://www.etsi.org/WebSite/document/Legal/ETSI%20Guide%20on%20IPRs%20November%202011.pdf © ETSI 2012. All rights reserved
Tension Inherent tense relationship between IPRs and Standards: Standards are intended for free, collective use IPRs are destined for private, exclusive use Tension may lead to conflicts whenever the technical content of a standard falls within the scope of an IPR (for instance of a patent as defined by its claims) Essential IPR = implementation of a standard is requiring the use of protected technology © ETSI 2012. All rights reserved
CHALLENGE Solve the tension between IPRs and standards by striking the proper balance between all the different interests involved Interests involved: IPR owner: wishes to exploit its IPR commercially third parties: wish to make and sell standard compliant products under reasonable conditions public use/end-users: seek the widest possible choice among affordable and interoperable products SDO: avoid wasting effort on the elaboration of a Deliverable which could subsequently be blocked by an essential IPR © ETSI 2012. All rights reserved
MAIN CHARACTERISTICS No technical reservation for the inclusion of IPRs in standards Early identification and disclosure of essential IPRs Ensuring the future applicability of standards in full respect of the rights of essential IPR owners by requesting irrevocable FRAND licensing undertaking (FRAND = fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory) No involvement of ETSI in any legal and/or commercial discussion on IPR matters (i.e. terms and conditions of the licenses to be determined by the parties of the agreement only) © ETSI 2012. All rights reserved
DISCLOSURE OF ESSENTIAL IPRs Members Duty to disclose essential IPR in a timely fashion No requirement to conduct IPR searches ETSI Publication of disclosed essential IPR in the ETSI IPR Database Users/Implementers of Standards can access information on essential IPRs at http://webapp.etsi.org/IPR/home.asp http://webapp.etsi.org/IPR/home.asp No checking of essentiality of the disclosed IPR Call for IPR by chairmen of technical bodies © ETSI 2012. All rights reserved
FRAND-Undertaking FRAND = Fair, Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory ETSI requesting essential IPR owner to give irrevocable undertaking to grant irrevocable licences under FRAND terms and conditions IPR owner may give or refuse FRAND licensing undertaking ETSI has a clearly defined procedure in case of non-availability of licenses, e.g. Article 8 of the ETSI IPR Policy Ts&Cs of the licenses to be determined by the parties of the agreement and outside ETSI © ETSI 2012. All rights reserved
Overview © ETSI 2012. All rights reserved Immediate irr. FRAND-undertaking by IPR owner / request by ETSI to give irr. FRAND-undertaking. YesNo Initiate procedure of non-availability (Clause 8 IPR Policy) Information reflected in IPR Database http://webapp.etsi.org/IPR/home.asp Submitting an own technical proposal to ETSI Own IPR which might be essential if proposal adopted Draw ETSIs attention on a bona fide basis
EX ANTE DISCLOSURE OF LICENSING TERMS = mechanism about submitting anticipated licensing terms for a given standard draft before the contribution becomes part of a standard How are ex ante disclosures working in ETSI: Ex ante disclosure is fully voluntary; i.e. no obligation to disclose licensing terms of essential IPRs lack of disclosure is not creating any implications Disclosure of licensing terms is left to the usual free market mechanisms Appropriate safeguards New ETSI Antitrust Guidelines ETSI is not involved to a large extent in the disclosure of licensing terms No discussion/negotiation of specific licensing terms within ETSI ETSI is not responsible for determining whether the licensing terms disclosed ex ante are FRAND © ETSI 2012. All rights reserved
CONCLUSIONS ETSI IPR Policy is fairly balancing all the interests involved ETSI IPR Policy is one of the key elements for the success of ETSIs globally-applicable standards allowing Members to fully reserve their IPRs is beneficial to the drafting of excellent and high-quality standards incentive for high technology companies to participate in the standardization process ETSI will continue to lead the debate on IPRs and Standards © ETSI 2012. All rights reserved
II. ETSI GUIDELINES FOR ANTITRUST COMPLIANCE © ETSI 2012. All rights reserved
Guidelines on Antitrust What is competition law? It is the law ensuring that: barriers to trade are not errected effective competition in a market is preserved efficiency, innovation, [lower] free regulation of prices are encouraged What are the possible implications for ETSI and its Members? Anti-competitive behaviour will be considered unenforceable and the competition authorities can impose significant fines with regards to such behaviour. In addittion, national courts can impose damages against the infringer of competition laws. © ETSI 2012. All rights reserved
Guidelines on Antitrust How to avoid anti-competitive behaviour in ETSI? Read the ETSI Guidelines for Antitrust Compliance and comply with them. http://www.etsi.org/WebSite/document/Legal/ETSI%20Guideli nes%20for%20Antitrust%20Compliance%20January%202011.p df http://www.etsi.org/WebSite/document/Legal/ETSI%20Guideli nes%20for%20Antitrust%20Compliance%20January%202011.p df In case of doubt, the assistance of legal counsel experienced in competition law matters shall be sought before proceeding. © ETSI 2012. All rights reserved
ETSI Legal Advisor Contact Details: Maissa Bahsoun. ETSI Legal Advisor firstname.lastname@example.org +33 4 92 94 42 47 © ETSI 2012. All rights reserved Thank you!
SEM21-02 ETSI Seminar 2010 « Legal Considerations » Erik Jansen, LL.M. ETSI Legal Director Copyright © ETSI All rights reserved. ETSI Seminar Sophia.
Footer text (edit in View : Header and Footer) The interface between Standards and IPRs The ETSI IPR Policy Dr. Michael Fröhlich ETSI Legal Adviser Copyright.
1 S.Tronchon Legal Considerations when drafting a standard.
Halifax, 31 Oct – 3 Nov 2011ICT Accessibility For All Dirk Weiler Chairman of the ETSI IPR Special Committee Document No: GSC16-IPR-02 Source: ETSI Contact:
ITU WORKSHOP ON STANDARDS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS (IPR) ISSUES Session 1: Perspective of SDO Dirk Weiler, Chairman of ETSI General Assembly and.
ITU WORKSHOP ON STANDARDS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS (IPR) ISSUES Session 5: Software copyright issues Dirk Weiler, Chairman of ETSI General Assembly.
1 AIPPI Forum 2011 Hyderabad, India, 15 October AIPPI Forum 2011 Hyderabad, India, 15 October 2011 Standardisation and Software Protection Strategies.
Geneva, October 9, 2012 Latest legal developments within ETSI Maïssa Bahsoun ETSI Legal Advisor Document No: GSC16bis-IPR-03 Source: ETSI Contact: Maïssa.
Fostering worldwide interoperabilityGeneva, July 2009 ETSI IPR Policy Latest Developments DARE Project Software Copyright Guide Erik Jansen, ETSI.
1 FRAND COMMITMENTS AND EU COMPETITION LAW Thomas Kramler European Commission, DG Competition (The views expressed are not necessarily those of the European.
1 WIPO-KIPO-KIPA IP Panorama Business School, October 6 to 10, 2008 IP Strategies in Standards Setting Tomoko Miyamoto Senior Counsellor, Patent Law Section.
Defining and applying mitigating and aggravating circumstances. Relevant changes to the amount of fine. Defining and applying mitigating and aggravating.
Summary of GSC-13 IPR WG Meeting Tom Goode, ATIS IPR WG Chair DOCUMENT #:GSC13-CL-05r1 FOR:Presentation SOURCE:Tom Goode, IPR WG Chair AGENDA ITEM:3.4.
1 May 2007 Instructions for the WG Chair The IEEE-SA strongly recommends that at each WG meeting the chair or a designee: l Show slides #1 through #5 of.
GSC: Standardization Advancing Global Communications Towards a Common ITU/ISO/IEC Patent Policy by Masamichi Niiya Telecommunication Standardization Bureau.
DOCUMENT #:GSC15-IPR-02 FOR:Presentation SOURCE:ETSI AGENDA ITEM:4 CONTACT(S):Erik Jansen, ETSI Legal Director Activities/Developments related to the ETSI.
Standards and competition policy EU-China Workshop on Application of Anti-monopoly Law in Intellectual Property Area Changsha, 11. – 12. March 2010 Peter.
IP Offices and the Implementation of the WIPO Development Agenda: Challenges and Opportunities September 18, 2009 Geneva Irfan Baloch World Intellectual.
Fostering worldwide interoperabilityGeneva, July 2009 General IPR Policy Issues Considerations for Developing or Revising PSO IPR Policies Kent Baker.
25 March 2008 (updated January 2012) The IEEE-SA strongly recommends that at each WG meeting the chair or a designee: l Show slides #1 through #4 of this.
© 2017 SlidePlayer.com Inc. All rights reserved.