Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Exploring the Psychometrics of a Committed Action Measure with an Undergraduate Sample Chelsea VanderWoude, Katherine Cooper, Chad E. Drake, Ph.D., Southern.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Exploring the Psychometrics of a Committed Action Measure with an Undergraduate Sample Chelsea VanderWoude, Katherine Cooper, Chad E. Drake, Ph.D., Southern."— Presentation transcript:

1 Exploring the Psychometrics of a Committed Action Measure with an Undergraduate Sample Chelsea VanderWoude, Katherine Cooper, Chad E. Drake, Ph.D., Southern Illinois University

2 “It's not hard to make decisions when you know what your values are.” ― Roy Disney

3 What are values?  What makes a good life?  Several unique factors to this question  Ideographic  Constantly changing  Never obtained

4

5 Why are values important?  Impact behavior  Roadmap for a meaningful life  Important in a therapy context  A key construct in ACT

6 Current values based assessments  Personal Values Questionnaire  The Survey of Guiding Principles questionnaire and card sort  VLQ - Valued Living Questionnaire  Values Bull's Eye  Values Compass pictures

7 VLQ Domains 1. Family 2. Intimate relationships 3. Parenting 4. Friends/social life 5. Work 6. Education/training 7. Recreation/fun 8. Spirituality/meaning & purpose in life 9. Citizenship/Community life 10. Physical self-care

8 VLQ Example  Part 1 1) Family (other than marriage or parenting) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10  Part 2 1) Family (other than marriage or parenting) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

9 Committed action  Values do not indicate action  We need a tool to measure both values and committed action  What does acting consistently with one’s values mean?

10 Valued Time and Difficulty Questionnaire (VTDQ)  Tool to assess client’s committed action in relation to their values  Developed for use in clinical contexts  Originally created for veterans  Ten domains derived from the VLQ

11 Comparing the VTDQ and VLQ VTDQ  10 domains  Three subscales  Values  Time  Difficulty  0-10 Likert Scale VLQ  10 domains  Two parts  Values  Living consistently  1-10 Likert Scale

12 VTDQ Example 1. a. How important is it to you to do things for or with family (parents, siblings, relatives)? 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1. b. In the last week, how much time have you spent doing things for or with family? 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1. c. In the last week, how difficult was it to do things for or with family because of unpleasant thoughts, feelings, memories, or bodily sensations 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

13 Current Study  177 Undergraduates at Southern Illinois University  43.5% Female, 55.9% Male,.6% Other  Average age 19.55  61% endorsed earning less than 50,000 annually

14 Current Study Continued  Acceptance and Action Questionnaire (AAQ)  General Health Questionnaire (GHQ)  Valued Time and Difficulty Questionnaire (VTDQ)  Social Dominance Orientation Scale (SDO)

15 Descriptives MeanStd. DeviationSkewnessKurtosis Statistic Std. ErrorStatisticStd. Error VTDQimportanceTotal70.711912.92863-.241.183-.076.363 VTDQtimeTotal49.638412.99319.415.183.151.363 VTDQdifficultyTotal17.395517.239011.134.183.709.363 AAQ: high scores are bad16.03957.49194.688.183-.571.363 GHQ: high scores are good36.81925.46279-1.046.1831.272.363 SDO: high scores are bad34.302112.43435.174.246-.990.488 Valid N (listwise)

16 Internal Consistency  Cronbach’s Alpha  Subscale A (Values):.691  Subscale B (Time):.615  Subscale C (Difficulty):.876

17 Significant correlations  VTDQ Importance and time subscales.609  GHQ and VTDQ time subscale.240  AAQ and VTDQ difficultly subscale.540  GHQ and VTDQ difficulty subscale -.429

18 Non-significant correlations  SDO and VTDQ difficulty subscale.113  VTDQ importance and difficulty subscales -.034  VTDQ difficulty and time subscales.089

19

20 Most and Least Common Areas  Most endorsed importance domains: education, physical health, friendship  Least endorsed importance domains: community, religion, intimate relationships  Most endorsed time domains: education, friendship, daily tasks or work  Least endorsed time domains: community, children, religion  Most difficult domains: Intimate relationships, education, daily tasks or work  Least difficult domains: children, community, religion

21 Future Directions  Future values based assessments should also include measures of committed action  Need to clearly define what it means to live consistently with one’s values  Provide more of an open ended portion for values  Hope values based measures will help clinicians in the future track progress in their clients


Download ppt "Exploring the Psychometrics of a Committed Action Measure with an Undergraduate Sample Chelsea VanderWoude, Katherine Cooper, Chad E. Drake, Ph.D., Southern."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google