1. May 12, 2006Spring 2006 Common Solutions Group Archival, Digital Preservation, and Records Management David Millman, Columbia University Ron Thielen, University of Chicago

2. May 12, 2006Spring 2006 Common Solutions Group Agenda Difference between an Archive, Repository, and Records Management The Three Reasons to Archive The State of the Industry, Government, Higher Ed, … Standards Policies and Processes Steps Toward Archival Some Key Issues

3. May 12, 2006Spring 2006 Common Solutions Group Differences between an Archive, Repository, and Records Management Institutional Repository – A system for collecting, preserving, and disseminating scholarly content. Archive – A collection of data that is maintained as a long-term record of a business, application, or information state. Archives are typically kept for auditing, regulatory, analysis or reference purposes rather than for application or data recovery. - SNIA Records Management – The systematic control of records throughout their life cycle. – ARMA

4. May 12, 2006Spring 2006 Common Solutions Group Reasons to Archive Legal and Regulatory Compliance As an Aid to Corporate Memory in Order to Improve Operational Effectiveness To Preserve Material of Potentially Historic and Enduring Value

5. May 12, 2006Spring 2006 Common Solutions Group Legal and Regulatory Issues Some financial records need to be retained for statutory periods varying up to 10 years Medical research needs to be retained beyond the life of the subject Lack of process for retaining records may be at best lack of due diligence and at worst obstruction It is increasingly common that courts are unwilling to accept the argument that discovery would be too difficult or expensive In some cases they are fining companies that are too slow to comply with court orders

6. May 12, 2006Spring 2006 Common Solutions Group Improve Operational Effectiveness Act as an Aid to Institutional Memory Assist Institutional Governance by Capturing the Rationale for Decisions Operational in our Context Extends to Scholarly Effectiveness

7. May 12, 2006Spring 2006 Common Solutions Group Historic and Enduring Value Not always possible to know a priori what will have enduring value Will a researcher in the next century be more interested in the content of a particular web site or how the content was presented and in our browser interface interactions? Both.

8. May 12, 2006Spring 2006 Common Solutions Group State of the IT Industry Used to be all about compliance Increasing awareness that there are other reasons for archival Scan of IT Industry Organizations Scan of IT Vendors Scan of Government Initiatives Scan of Higher Education Initiatives

9. May 12, 2006Spring 2006 Common Solutions Group IT Industry Organizations SNIA (Storage Network Industry Association) Data Management Forum (DMF) LTACSI (Long Term Archive and Compliance Storage Initiative) 100 Year Archive Task Force SDDF (Self Describing Data Format) Task Force ARMA - Association for Records Managers and Administrators (aka RIM Professionals) – Working with the SNIA AIIM – Association for Information and Image Management – Believes that ISO adoption of PDF/A is the way to address preservation

10. May 12, 2006Spring 2006 Common Solutions Group Scan of IT Vendors Niche (generally seem to get it) Archivas, Permabit, Yosemite 800 lb Gorillas (some get it, some don’t) HP, IBM, EMC, Sun (aka StorageTek) “Archival” Vendors (generally don’t seem to get it) Commvault, Zantaz, ZipLip, iLumin, …

11. May 12, 2006Spring 2006 Common Solutions Group Survey of Government Authorities and Initiatives LOC “Library of Congress” NARA “National Archives and Records Administration” NDIIPP “National Digital Information Infrastructure and Preservation Program”

12. May 12, 2006Spring 2006 Common Solutions Group Survey of Higher Education and Library Initiatives DSpace (an institutional repository, not an archive) FEDORA (ditto) Stanford LOCKSS (Lots of Copies Keep Stuff Safe) DAITSS (Dark Archive in the Sunshine State) NEDLIB (Networked European Deposit Library) JORUM (repository service, U.K.) Columbia (DSpace pilots; FEDORA in Socioeconomic Data Center Long-Term Archive) CDAD (Chicago Digital Archive Depository) RLG Digital Repository Certification UCSD / SRB (Storage Resource Broker) JHOVE (Harvard--object validation service)

13. May 12, 2006Spring 2006 Common Solutions Group Standards (formal, ad-hoc, and otherwise) OAIS “Open Archival Information System” PREMIS “Preservation Metadata Standard” METS “Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard” EAD “Encoded Archival Description” MADS “Metadata Authority Description Schema” MODS "Metadata Object Description Schema" DOD 5015.2 “Design Criteria Standard for Electronic Records Management Software Applications” ISO 15489 (Records Management) and on … and on … and …

14. May 12, 2006Spring 2006 Common Solutions Group Standards for Access and Interoperation Institutional Repository service vs Archive Scholarly/Instructional Access issues Discovery Interoperation/reuse Citation stability Digital Library issues Content structure Format migration

15. May 12, 2006Spring 2006 Common Solutions Group

16. May 12, 2006Spring 2006 Common Solutions Group Policy/process Strategies email: nightly incrementals (a backup strategy) digital library: quarterly curator sign-off (an archival strategy) Faculty buy-in minimum metadata? education

17. May 12, 2006Spring 2006 Common Solutions Group Education experiment: Spectrum of Stability Active collaboration Versioning Citable working- paper Publication Multiple users w/“collab space” functions File system metaphor / w/some metadata Institutional repository / metadata Preserved / archived / cataloged Scholarly research activity Library curation

18. May 12, 2006Spring 2006 Common Solutions Group Five Steps to Archival Backup - a backup is not an archive, but backup processes, support personnel, and infrastructure may (or may not) support parts of the archival infrastructure Simple Bitstream Preservation - keep from losing the information; adds fixity checking, digital media asset management to backup Records Management - adds policy based classification and information life-cycle management Intellectual Content Preservation - keep the format current; migrate (or emulate) formats & structures Archival - adds bibliographic and administrative metadata

19. May 12, 2006Spring 2006 Common Solutions Group Sampling of Issues Not Enough Cooperation to Build Standards Based Archival Systems It’s not just about the data Metadata is key – Where does it come from (harvest, contributor, cataloger?) Context is often necessary (e.g. roles, organizational structures both formal and informal, provenance) A Backup is not an Archive IP & DRM Who’s Archive Is It? Digital Media Asset Management (tape is dead, long live tape) Balancing Collection of Everything vs. Determining Suitability of Material for Archival (Selection Criteria) Data Classification (Metadata Driven, Policy Based Selection Processes?) Requirements for Research Preservation and Dissemination Fixity Checking and Repair Disaster Recovery ?